Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mike goodson and Everette Brown


Recommended Posts

I think that you may be on to summen. I admitt that I was a little against using our 1st rnd pick last year on a guy that was only used on situational downs but now I think about it he's our 1st rnd pick with a year of experience and tutelage under his belt. I'm liking the move better now. As for Goodson, yeah I agree that he should be used in the slot more or on screens. I just don't know if I trust his ball control yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that you may be on to summen. I admitt that I was a little against using our 1st rnd pick last year on a guy that was only used on situational downs but now I think about it he's our 1st rnd pick with a year of experience and tutelage under his belt. I'm liking the move better now. As for Goodson, yeah I agree that he should be used in the slot more or on screens. I just don't know if I trust his ball control yet.

goodsons a rookie he will get better at ball control over time.. it wouldn't surprise me to see him as our #3 WR next year... no more RB's time to spread the skill around

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sutton > Goodson

Goodson is a more lethal talent though. I don't buy the fumblitis label you guys always give him, every rookie RB get's mild case fumbles and Goodson really wasn't that bad at ball control, one of his fumbles was bullshit anyway. He could be serious weapon just like several other guys on the team, we just have to use him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don’t think people are saying that picking up the option s a call for the pitchforks. We would have had to do things differently a couple of years back to make declining the option a valid move. We didn’t and here we are. People largely accept that. The patter it adheres to, reinforces the nausea we feel when the idea of an extension, and at top of the market no less, comes up.  One that he hasn’t shown he deserves.   Same as he did not deserve to be drafted 1.1. Look at Pavia and what really is the difference? Bryce is a nice guy and Pavia is an asshole lol. They are both no margin for error non day one talents. One went undrafted.  
    • We hate losing. I don't know Bryce to hate him. His play as a QB, I absolutely hate. It's just not good enough. If there were a lottery held to select the order and all 32 starting QBs could be drafted as the starting QB for whatever team selected them, how long do you think it would be before Bryce's name was called? Top 10, top 20, bottom 8? Think about it.  For me, having never seen back to back games with franchise QB level performance in 3 years tells me what I need to know. We still need to be looking for our solution at QB.     
    • Dude, I'm saying the Cardinals have proven they know nothing. Not saying keeping Bryce is the best choice long term, just saying that we've made the right move for this moment in time.  But man, the Cardinals are never a blueprint for success. Haven't been since they were in Chicago.
×
×
  • Create New...