Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

No such thing as 'Throwing the Season'


Urrymonster

Recommended Posts

I have seen this term thrown around a lot, which is ridiculous.

In professional sports you literally can not afford to throw seasons, because it's against the rules of the game and you stand to lose more than you could ever possibly hope to gain.

If people cottoned on that you were releasing big contracts and intentionally playing for a lockout, who in their right mind would sign with you, who would want to re-sign with you and why on Earth would you pump millions into the team merely the season before?

Face it, regardless of who is on the roster come September, and there are some damn good players on ours, we will be playing to win it all. We will also believe we can do it. Fact.

We are not putting Fox in a 'lame duck season' because he is fighting for a job, along with every single player on the roster. To give up, is to lose everything and there is simply too much on the line for Richardson to allow that to happen.

All he has done is release some non impact players, who all had either age, injury or contract question marks. None were going to be extended beyond their current deal and all had a guy who had starting experience behind them. These moves though are made for the long term success of the team, however that does not mean we can't win now.

So, please just think before posting that Richardson is intentionally scratching out this season. That simply does not happen. Even if we lose 8 straight you can bet everyone in the organisation will be trying to get 8 wins in a row to finish as best they can. The cuts are also not him simply cutting costs, it's a long term plan that still includes all our impact players frm last year bar Pep. How is losing one impact player playing for 2011?!

I appreciate the concept is not to actually throw the season and that people see no way we can win with the moves we have made. I would just ask those to be patient and actually wait for some football first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eh, the Panthers aren't putting together a team built to win in 2010. That happens.

I would say the Panthers are "throwing the season". They are simply looknig at building a team for 2012......and in order to do that it pretty much makes certain they will not win in 2010. Guys will play at 100% and coaches will coach 100%......but the Panthers are actually throwing the 2010 season away to improve in the long haul.

I think people are in denial. There are years in the sport where you don't expect to win b/c of your own actions looking long term. This is it for Carolina.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No one uses the term throwing the season. Instead they talk about rebuilding, going on a youth movement, etc.

While it doesn't happen as often in football it is pretty comon in other sports particularly baseball because there isn't a cap. I remember Florida winning the World Series and then dumping everyone the following year. They did contend eventually but haven't returned to the Series since.

Now this year is uncapped which is the only time that has happened in recent memory and we suddenly go on an unprecedented purge of veterans. Suddenly we go on a youth movement and a rebuilding process.

Nah there can't be any connection...........

We aren't dumping salaries and replacing them with cheap young guys...............

You aren't exactly dumping the season and you hope to contend, it just usually works out that way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh, the high expectations after a draft. Keep your expectations low, people. Darin Gantt's latest "Ask The Old Guy" gives life to one of those lessons about pro football reality as a fan: "Rasheed Walker was a three-year starter at left tackle for the Packers, so Freeling is going to have to work. Hunter's got another big 'un in front of him in Bobby Brown III and a different kind of defensive tackle in Tershawn Wharton. Chris Brazzell II's got a lot of traffic at his position. Zakee Wheatley has to be better than the chronically underappreciated Nick Scott, and Sam Hecht is a fifth-round rookie at the hardest position on the line to play, who probably doesn't have immediate positional flexibility, and a solid free agent addition in Luke Fortner in front of him. "Fans generally love their draft class as soon as it arrives, because there is no evidence to the contrary yet. Once guys get on the field, the reality begins to creep in, and the seasoned among you remember that if you get three or four good players out of a draft, that was an amazing draft." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-things-looking-up-after-the-draft-monroe-freeling-luke-kuechly-bryce-young-derrick-brown Don't get crazy. Winning the draft (or the offseason BTW) on paper always leads to good feelings and great expectations, especially when you seemingly succeeded the season before, but let's remember that the Panthers are very much a work in progress. Team building takes time. If we get a couple of starters out of the draft, it's a good draft, but three or four would be an amazing draft, and anything more than that is actually sensational--even if entails a few multiple high end rotational players along with three starters. Moreover, kind of within that same vein, the coaches have to let the kids off the chain. Remember the coach-speak of past coaches about competition that is anything but because coaches have their notions about veteran experience? Not saying that they're necessarily wrong, but sometimes I think their reluctance to put the young guys out there is based somewhat in dogma or possibly fear because big stakes are on the line (e.g., their jobs). It can be frustrating to say the least, but the coaches are supposed to know best. Again, I say all of this so that we can remember to temper expectations and keep them within the realm of reality. It's like telling your mind to think of it as something akin to under-promising and over-delivering. Leave room to be pleasantly surprised for the best case scenario, but be cognizant that that rarely happens. I would think at this point, most of us should be able to recognize growth when we see it, and sometimes that growth doesn't manifest itself in the form of immediate supremacy, but a setting of the stage for long term dominance for years to come. It seems like we're on track for an emergence by 2028 or 2029. We still have huge questions, but by 2029, hopefully we will take our seat at the table of the perennial contenders in the NFL.  
    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
×
×
  • Create New...