Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Canes vs Rags 7pm


Panthers Fan 69
 Share

Recommended Posts

Also if Tripp said power play or Shane said they will get rewarded one more time I was gonna flip my poo. 
 

Their player was literally laying on the puck and then tried to paw it back tripped Skjei and then held his stick. I think it was fuging Fox. I’m not sure. 

Edited by Harbingers
  • Pie 1
  • Flames 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Day1PanthersFan said:

I think when Guetzal and Kuzenetzov gets used to everyone , they will be major contributors 

Also cheers to Kooch , kept us in inspite of terrible turnovers 

We got to find a way to get past these strong defensive teams, like Vegas who made Bob and upchuck look mediocre 

Jam 2nd we beat the rags in the Garden 6-1 with Shesterkin in net so it can be done. 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Panthers Fan 69 said:

Gonna take some games. Plus, those two played awesome. Those goals will come. 

Well obviously it was tongue in cheek but not from the broadcast. 
 

KK line > Aho > Kuz > Staal for overall offensive play and general play. Fast needs to go back on the Staal line for games like this, he was real Fast today and probably our best forward on the ice overall. 
 

Rod needs to put Gunz and Kuz on different lines for now too. Give them time to adjust. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I personally feel like the Kuznetsov line needs a stronger forechecking presence.

I originally was against a Svechnikov - Kuznetsov - Necas line but I think I might be for it.

Guentzel - Aho - Teravainen

Svechnikov - Kuznetsov - Necas

Martinook - Staal - Jarvis

Noesen - Kotkaniemi - Fast

Drury, Lemiuex

And if you want to give the first line an additional forechecker then swap Teravainen and Jarvis.

  • Pie 3
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, MillionDollarCam said:

I personally feel like the Kuznetsov line needs a stronger forechecking presence.

I originally was against a Svechnikov - Kuznetsov - Necas line but I think I might be for it.

Guentzel - Aho - Teravainen

Svechnikov - Kuznetsov - Necas

Martinook - Staal - Fast

Noesen - Kotkaniemi - Jarvis

Drury, Lemiuex

And if you want to give the first line an additional forechecker then swap Teravainen and Jarvis.

This is exactly how I would have our lines, only one cavit swap Jarvis and Fast, 

Jarvis was actually scoring far more with Noesen-KK-Jarvis (they were our second line for like 2 months) just have the Martinook-Staal-Jarvis line as the cloud

Checkers avaim.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, MillionDollarCam said:

That’s a nice night! How much did you wager on your parlay?

Zero in cash haha they are handing tons of house cash bets right now, I cashed it out like four minutes later in a panic lol pardon 11 leg bet I got 9 right in a row before the thunder sh*t the bed I'm not a basketball guy I based it all off advanced metrics and a bit of gut instict.

 

1532791809_Screenshot_20240312_215223_FanDuelSportsbook.thumb.jpg.c5fdb8e33ca5de79710686d20c074a16.jpg

Edited by CarolinaWillRise
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, MillionDollarCam said:

I personally feel like the Kuznetsov line needs a stronger forechecking presence.

I originally was against a Svechnikov - Kuznetsov - Necas line but I think I might be for it.

Guentzel - Aho - Teravainen

Svechnikov - Kuznetsov - Necas

Martinook - Staal - Jarvis

Noesen - Kotkaniemi - Fast

Drury, Lemiuex

And if you want to give the first line an additional forechecker then swap Teravainen and Jarvis.

I’d go 

Gunz - Aho - TT

Svech - Kuz - Jarvis

Martinook - Staal - Fast

Noesen - Drury/KK - Necas

In a game like this the Staal line needs Fast. I hate to say it, Jarvis did jack poo tonight. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • During parts of the season, you told me that Brian Burns was not the primary pass rusher on the Giants. I told you that that's not what the stats or the actual play were saying. Bucky Brooks was thinking something similar to you pre-season, and I'm pretty sure he wasnt still pontificating about Burns' play during the season, but here is what he's saying now:   "When the Giants traded for Burns two offseasons ago and immediately signed him to a new blockbuster deal (five years for $141 million with $87.5 million guaranteed), I questioned whether his performance would match the compensation. As a speed-rushing specialist with just one double-digit-sack season (12.5 in 2022) prior to his arrival in New York, Burns had not consistently dominated off the edge. However, the 27-year-old shut me up in 2025 with a spectacular season that featured 16.5 sacks, 22 tackles for loss, 31 quarterback hits, seven passes defensed and three forced fumbles. Wreaking such havoc on a four-win football team only underscored his individual dominance. Considering his numbers and impact as a playmaker in his third Pro Bowl season, Burns served me a slice of humble pie that I couldn't refuse."   Now, you can go to the old, stale take that he can't lead the D-line, but I will say that most everyone needs help. Burns is not generational like Julius Peppers, but he obviously has the skills and the motivation (after his payday, mind you) to be a force unto himself, if not a force multiplier. And, with John Harbaugh coming in, Burns will probably only get better as he will likely get put in a better situation to succeed, or at least sustain his success.   Speaking of being put into a better situation to succeed, I recall our buddy @Basbear mentioning this guy during preseason: Devin Lloyd "Last offseason, Jacksonville chose to decline the former first-round pick’s fifth-year option due to inconsistent production. Lloyd responded admirably, showing the football world that he’s a baller with elite playmaking skills. The impending free agent finished the season with six takeaways -- five interceptions (including a 99-yard pick-six of Patrick Mahomes) and a fumble recovery -- while also displaying outstanding range as a sideline-to-sideline defender. A resilient player who enjoyed the best season of his career following a sticky contract situation and training camp battle, Lloyd silenced the skeptics who questioned his big-play potential and overall game."   Now of course, our friend was talking in terms of possibly trading Jalen Coker for Lloyd. Many would still balk at that after Coker's big time breakout against the Rams, but the fact is is that it was a discussion worth having. Lloyd is a big time defender, though several of you tried to tell us that he was nothing special, notwithstanding solid stats even during the 2024 season. Lloyd looks to be a very nice 'backer for years to come, and he's likely gonna be paid highly. We probably can't afford him now, with all our needs and possible extensions (Coker being one, but a cheaper one), but fate apparently never had Lloyd in our cards to begin with.  https://www.nfl.com/news/caleb-williams-george-pickens-and-tyler-shough-among-10-nfl-players-who-proved-me-wrong  
    • He's 34 and doesn't fit the Canes for anything more than 2 seasons. His production is at his lowest level in 8 seasons and he's near the end of his career. I'll take a 29-year old Tuch. 
×
×
  • Create New...