Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Please tell me it's just a rumor........


TheRoadToGlory

Recommended Posts

First and foremost, i just want to say that I am in no way, shape, or form a fan, and I am very much against the idea of Michael Vick being a panther. With that being said, i have heard from multiple people that live in Waxhaw that he has been spotted there withing the past few days. I have been told by the spouse of a dispatcher that he was stopped during a routine license check. I have also heard from a real estate agents spouse that he is indeed looking for a house in the Waxhaw - Marvin area. I don't post on here very often, and i know the Micheal Vick threads are getting old, so i don't mean to beat a dead horse. Just curious to know if any of you have heard the same rumors or anything of the sort. Again, I hope this is just a rumor... bash me if you must for bringing it up, but that is what i have heard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So than what is the possibility that the FO has made a deal for him and are waiting for the draft to announce it? And no, I didn't just join, I have been a member for a while now, I just hardly ever post anything ( usually just read new news). I have seen all the previous posts on the topic, so I knew I would get bashed a bit for starting this thread. Anyways... I hope you are right about he will never be a panther, just stating what I have been hearing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So than what is the possibility that the FO has made a deal for him and are waiting for the draft to announce it? And no, I didn't just join, I have been a member for a while now, I just hardly ever post anything ( usually just read new news). I have seen all the previous posts on the topic, so I knew I would get bashed a bit for starting this thread. Anyways... I hope you are right about he will never be a panther, just stating what I have been hearing.

Hey yo! Are you really this dumb chico?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So than what is the possibility that the FO has made a deal for him and are waiting for the draft to announce it? And no, I didn't just join, I have been a member for a while now, I just hardly ever post anything ( usually just read new news). I have seen all the previous posts on the topic, so I knew I would get bashed a bit for starting this thread. Anyways... I hope you are right about he will never be a panther, just stating what I have been hearing.

O trust. That wasn't bashing. look further back on the board, and will see bashing. i have no problems w/ you, or your post. just telling you what I think. :cool:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was watching a YouTube and it was said that scout and GM insider types were saying the NIL had killed rounds 4-7. I don’t know that I buy it, seems like it might for a year or maybe two but then those guys have to move on.  NCAA is apparently about to give 5 years of eligibility. It is gonna skew those entrants older maybe.   
    • Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...