Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What did you expect when we hired Fitterer’s BFF?

BIGH2001

By BIGH2001,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

BIGH2001 Grand Master

BIGH2001

Posted
Posted

I mean really. He was either hired because he’s a Tepper yes man or he was the only person who would actually take the job or maybe both. There haven’t been any reports of any dissension from Morgan on any of Fitterer’s terrible decisions. 
 

This past year’s draft was also very Fitterish. We wasted our top two picks on boom or bust luxury guys when we desperately needed help at non-skill positions. And the back end of the draft looks like wasted picks just like fat Fitt. 
 

Do the same dumb poo and get the same results. Regardless of what Tepper says, he’s still running the show behind the scenes

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, BIGH2001 said:

I mean really. He was either hired because he’s a Tepper yes man or he was the only person who would actually take the job or maybe both. There haven’t been any reports of any dissension from Morgan on any of Fitterer’s terrible decisions. 
 

This past year’s draft was also very Fitterish. We wasted our top two picks on boom or bust luxury guys when we desperately needed help at non-skill positions. And the back end of the draft looks like wasted picks just like fat Fitt. 
 

Do the same dumb poo and get the same results. Regardless of what Tepper says, he’s still running the show behind the scenes

Tepper and Caldwell looked all over BOA and hired the best GM they could find there.  

Then Dan stuck with his Seattle boys.  The Seattle fixation has been a key aspect of our demise. 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • ProcessBlue2
      Easier Path

      By ProcessBlue2 · Posted

      I agree here.  Falcons won't lay down. Tampa SHOULD win. However, it is a short week and both teams need this game to be played different ways. Tampa needs to have time to scheme and keep this game fast paced, Atlanta needs this to be a physical heavy run slobberknocker which is more likely to happen with just 3 days. Keep in mind, Raheem should probably be fired tomorrow but won't be because it's a short week, he can save some grace and coach for his job Thursday. I wouldn't be surprised to see him be super aggressive on calls all night.  I worry about the Saints as well. I really hope our week of rest to get healthy and realign focus outweighs the risk of us getting lazy again. Hopefully, the last time we played them was a wake up call and they come in motivated and pissed off to prove a point. However, the Saints are having fun shitting on everyone and I would not be surprised if it was a repeat. Somehow I feel us and the Bucs will both find a way to lose.  
    • mav1234
      Week 14 - Other NFL Games

      By mav1234 · Posted

      Man Mahomes with the pick...  Texans offense needs to wake the fug up
    • mav1234
      Down year for QBs

      By mav1234 · Posted

      1) This article is from the middle of the 2024 season. There was no season that ended with 202.8 YPG. By the end of the season, passing numbers had bounced up to 217. We shared those numbers here a few times. The fact that from Oct to end of season numbers went up by ~14 yards suggests we'll see a bounce up this year too.   2) The article you're referencing is from 2016 onwards... My numbers were not, just last few years. That's the time period we're talking about. 3) There is DEFINITELY a long term trend down. My comment was regarding it is unlikely I see teams changing strategies with regards to QBs because the numbers have been pretty consistent for the last 4 years. 
×
×
  • Create New...