Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Updated 2025 draft order


Champagnepapi704
 Share

Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, CarolinaLivin said:

You already know the answer to this. There isn’t one. There’s nothing you can tell coaches or players to talk them into this. Unless you can somehow promise every player on the team that this season stats don’t count, the film on this year will be deleted, and all players will get signed to player-friendly (not team-friendly basically) long term deals. Then you go up to tepper and promise 3 super bowls after the jay-z 7 years are up.
 

players are playing for the money left on contracts and the contract coming. Coaches are more or less doing the same. And this isn’t even adding in pride and/or egos. 
 

i get you’re just trying to make the other guy look dumb. But let’s end this lol the idea is dumb and isn’t happening. Only fans believe in tanking… and that’s okay. Root away for the tank. Whatever makes you happy. 

i'm not trying to make anyone look dumb. 

they seem sure. i'm sure they are seeing something that i'm missing out on. 

let this be the definitive tanking thread where the whole thing is explained. how to successfully pull off a tank.

give me the deets, folks. (that means details)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Moonraker said:

What's actually insane is that we are so far away from competing for anything real, and there are 9 teams worse than us LOL.

Eh.....that's still TBD. It is a HELL of a race for these top 10 picks though.

Lots of these teams play each other over the last part of the season, so we will see some sorting of the order.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Champagnepapi704 said:

What's crazy is i never said tank i said I don't see the point in winning against dumpster teams in the last 8 games to feel good about a qb who can't lead a game winning drive or win a playoff game 

lol

"so i didn't actually use the word 'tank'....i just don't think we should be trying to win."

this is awesome.

  • Flames 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, rayzor said:

i'm not trying to make anyone look dumb. 

they seem sure. i'm sure they are seeing something that i'm missing out on. 

let this be the definitive tanking thread where the whole thing is explained. how to successfully pull off a tank.

give me the deets, folks. (that means details)

Lol alright, you have fun with that.

 

Though I am also intrigued as to how you pull that off and don’t end up fired haha so I can’t be mad. I’ll be waiting for an answer even if i don’t expect a good one. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Moonraker said:

What's actually insane is that we are so far away from competing for anything real, and there are 9 teams worse than us LOL.

be careful. you might get laughed at saying that we aren't the absolute worst team in the history of all pro sports....which just happen to be the ones that are mad we won a couple and are trying to win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CarolinaLivin said:

Lol alright, you have fun with that.

 

Though I am also intrigued as to how you pull that off and don’t end up fired haha so I can’t be mad. I’ll be waiting for an answer even if i don’t expect a good one. 

oh yeah...i'm having fun with it. 

not to mention that it's kind of illegal and we could get serious fines and end up actually LOSING those pics we tanked for. 

  • Flames 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, rayzor said:

I understand all that, but thats not the issue. The issue is people are getting mad that this team isn't lying down. My question is how do you get your team to lie down.

What do you do to get your team to quit trying do you don't win "pointless" games?

You have to do it from a coaching perspective. Honestly, it looked like the Giants were doing it this past Sunday. That did not look like a team trying to give itself the best opportunity to win. I mean, you're running the ball at will and you still let your terrible QB throw it 37 times? That doesn't make any logical sense if you're actually trying to win. We were in the same situation on the other side but we only let threw it 25 times. 

I don't think NFL teams go out there and deliberately throw games. But you can make decisions throughout the course of the game to tip the scales toward your desired outcome without being blatantly obvious about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

You have to do it from a coaching perspective. Honestly, it looked like the Giants were doing it this past Sunday. That did not look like a team trying to give itself the best opportunity to win. I mean, you're running the ball at will and you still let your terrible QB throw it 37 times? That doesn't make any logical sense if you're actually trying to win. We were in the same situation on the other side but we only let threw it 25 times. 

I don't think NFL teams go out there and deliberately throw games. But you can make decisions throughout the course of the game to tip the scales toward your desired outcome without being blatantly obvious about it.

Daboll could get fired. It could be that they really are just that inept. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Champagnepapi704 said:

Last consecutive winning seasons? Look at the late season wins and what that lead to the next season...

Explain "winning culture"

 

Screenshot_20241113_131955_Chrome.jpg

Screenshot_20241113_132006_Chrome.jpg

Screenshot_20241113_132051_Chrome.jpg

Screenshot_20241113_132112_Chrome.jpg

lol i'll explain that once you actually give me the strategy for tanking...sorry, not "tanking" ...getting your team to just not try...or whatever it is you are thinking is such a brilliant tactic to lose games instead of trying to win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

You have to do it from a coaching perspective. Honestly, it looked like the Giants were doing it this past Sunday. That did not look like a team trying to give itself the best opportunity to win. I mean, you're running the ball at will and you still let your terrible QB throw it 37 times? That doesn't make any logical sense if you're actually trying to win. We were in the same situation on the other side but we only let threw it 25 times. 

I don't think NFL teams go out there and deliberately throw games. But you can make decisions throughout the course of the game to tip the scales toward your desired outcome without being blatantly obvious about it.

They were not trying to lie down. If you want to see what that looks like, see the Philly mutiny that led to Doug Pederson's firing. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, rayzor said:

 

Daboll could get fired. It could be that they really are just that inept. 

 

Very possible. I think he's basically already fired and he probably knows it. I mean, there's no salary cap on coaches. Who's to say a team can't go to a coach and say, "Listen, we're going a different direction after this year. We can fire you now or how about $5M to out your thumb on the scale in a non-obvious way and get us better draft position? And yeah, there will be an iron clad NDA you're going to sign."

I'm not saying that it happens but I'm honestly not aware of anything that would prevent it from happening. And honestly in an industry with only 32 tightly linked potential employers in a very small community of professionals it's not like people are going to super eager to burn bridges giving up the dirt anyway. NFL blacklisting is real. Not in a coordinated way but just in the fact that all 32 employees are very similarly motivated type of way. You don't have to have coordination for all 32 teams to arrive at the same conclusion on potential employees.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

They were not trying to lie down. If you want to see what that looks like, see the Philly mutiny that led to Doug Pederson's firing. 

The players weren't but from a play calling perspective what they were doing just made no damn sense at all. Could the staff just be that dumb? Yeah, absolutely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

The players weren't but from a play calling perspective what they were doing just made no damn sense at all. Could the staff just be that dumb? Yeah, absolutely.

Yes. It literally happens all the time. Our own coaching staff has done this in multiple games this year. It's called incompetence.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm not sure 19 is too high for Rodriguez anymore.  He looks to be moving up boards, but it could be smokescreens.  
    • I see XL this way---great athlete.  Good person.  When we drafted him, we knew he was raw.  One year of WR in college (starting) and in HS, he was a QB, I believe. We knew we would need patience with him.  I think year 3 will be make or break.  He is older, and I think that people with his athletic ability have always been better than those with less---but those with less can become more successful.  Why is that?  in my view, it is mental. XL can learn the mechanics and nuances of playing WR if he becomes focused on it and works at it.  I had the opportunity to talk to Armanti Edwards one day after OTAs (great guy) and he discussed how overwhelming it was.  He seemed shocked.  At that time, I knew that Fox hated the pick (I heard him mock Armanti to another coach when he saw Edwards drop a punt from a jugs machine--then I saw Armanti look back at Fox as if to suggest that he was feeling the pressure to please the coach. We forget that these are kids in their early 20s.  At the time, Fox was a lame duck.  Remember when he had Clausen as the #3 QB and was forced to move him up the ladder?  I liked Fox, but I think the climate and culture was influenced by the politics.  Currently, I see another Wr from SC who is struggling, but he is ina  very nurturing, positive culture. Let's see what happens with XL.  I am frustrated too---but XL was a second round talent who was raw and we traded up to get him.  He had 500 yards as a rookie--lets call 2025 a sophomore slump and see if we can't get at least 50 yards per game out of him.  If not, cut bait.
    • Sadiq feels like a lazy comp.  Sure he would be a big improvement over what we have but at a position we don't and maybe can't (midget qb) utilize.  I hope the staff puts together a list of players you automatically take at 19 (Freeling, Lemon, Downs, Faulk) and if none are there, trade back to look at (Thieneman, McNeil-Warren, Proctor, Lomu, Allen, Iheanachor, Banks, Woods).  I get the people that think an OT would be a waste because we temporarily patched that hole, and ILB and safety are a waste because that is high to take those particular positions, but by trading back we get extra picks to fill every need.  A draft that has an OT, S, ILB, slot WR, and C would really put us in a good position moving forward if we get an extra first three rounds additional pick.   
×
×
  • Create New...