Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2 minute offense during the game.


panthers55
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, panthers55 said:

Maybe it is just me but Bryce seems to flourish in the 2 min hurry up offense. What if we ran a hurry up offense more often. I know Canales likes the run heavy possession offense and there is nothing wrong with that but is it the best use of Bryce?

Every QB does and it's honestly because defenses are generally playing soft coverage in those situations.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, panthers55 said:

Maybe it is just me but Bryce seems to flourish in the 2 min hurry up offense. What if we ran a hurry up offense more often. I know Canales likes the run heavy possession offense and there is nothing wrong with that but is it the best use of Bryce?

Hard to run that offense the entire game with our lack of WR weapons and you don’t want to move away from the ground and pound which is our strength, but I do agree it wouldn’t be the worst idea to incorporate a bit more hurry up and see how Bryce does just letting it loose 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Every QB does and it's honestly because defenses are generally playing soft coverage in those situations.

to add, you get more static personel because there are far fewer subs, so if you can exploit say, an undersized CB on a receiver, its harder for the defense to snap change of plan to defend a group or play.  There is a downside, and its a big one that was exposed when chip kelly tried doing just that in the NFL...you're defense WILL get gassed, regardless of talent or personel.  We have a....serviceable...defense when they have time on the sideline.  Especially with how talent deficient our defensive unit is, if we put them out there more today, the eagles easily could have scored 35 points or more.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

Just because you're running a two minute offense doesn't mean it's a two minute situation. Defenses play soft in those situations because they're using the clock as a 12th man. 

Look at the Eagles they were blitzing a lot but it makes you play zone behind it which plays to Bryces strengths.  As I said the advantages are the defense will have difficulty dialing up exotic blitzes or stunts. So even if they bring pressure it will be manageable. Second, they can't substitute defenders situational and you can catch them off guard. Now the qb has to be somewhat elusive and receivers have to be good at the scramble drill. But as long as you don't go constantly 3 and out which gives the defense no rest, it can be a good change of pace to ride momentum. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, jb2288 said:

Hard to run that offense the entire game with our lack of WR weapons and you don’t want to move away from the ground and pound which is our strength, but I do agree it wouldn’t be the worst idea to incorporate a bit more hurry up and see how Bryce does just letting it loose 

With Legette dropping everything he was a big drive killer. And remember that running from the hurry up can break plays as they expect you to pass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Actually I have always felt that using a qb to sneak was a huge mistake even for big guys. Do you remember when Cam sneaked the ball and got a helmet spear to the head and it wasn't even called. It is unnecessary and potentially dangerous. Everyone knows what you are going to do. Why not have a big guy or backup run the ball who is disposable? Yeah they know what is coming if you bring in a big guy. Like they don't if you keep the QB in...... Actually there are many more reasons not to sneak the ball with the qb versus using something else like New Orleans did who could still run or pass.
    • you want me to provide evidence of his jump balls? Or bailing the pocket?  I don't think either of those claims requires me to show you evidence.  What do you want evidence of exactly?  never did I mention downfield throws.  I said, he gets blind to play at the lines because of his size (the quick stuff).  There are literally plays I don't have time to search for but have been highlighted on QB school where there is just no way he can see the options on certain plays even if wide open (talking behind and around the line of scrimmage).   Line too close paired with the receiving  option too close.  And the stat I referenced (which you can find on next gen stats) was he is below average at and behind the line of scrimmage....which I'm sure his size/vision plays a role in the why. I have an agenda? Cool.  Then so do you.  and again, Bryce's cherry picked best play (which isn't how anything works).....still leaves him on the low end of production.  I'm not overly bashing Bryce.  I just acknowledge, most signs point to him having a low ceiling.  And in the big picture, that's not the direction you want to go.  He is our QB for now.  I hope he improves.  Which in turn would allow our O and others to develop.   But to me, there isn't much of an argument that Bryce Young is anything but short term solution.   
    • Again where is the evidence. You keep saying it but honestly you have shown no evidence. Unless you know what he was supposed to do and then what he did do, you don't know anything about his intentions and or forced changes due to height. His completion percentage for passes from 1 to 10 yards was only slightly lower than his best percentage which was 10 to 20 yards passing.  Not enough of a difference to be significantly different.  Truth is you have an agenda that you try to justify despite any evidence to the contrary. Many of us felt the same way but have allowed his actual play to inform our opinion. I still would have picked Stroud over Bryce but I am willing to keep an open mind and see what is there instead of filtering everything through my biases and already polarized opinions.
×
×
  • Create New...