Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

why DT?


invisible38833

Recommended Posts

Okay I know this is not an area of major strength, but we have the following players here today:

Leonard, Tyler, Johnson, Irvin, Hayden and some other guy. Not fantastic players, but they are all young and I think have potential. We traded our 5th for one of these guys and another late rounder for the other. I don't see adding another DT to this mix unless Irvin or Johnson are not sticking around. The only way I could see it making sense is if there was just a huge DT there and we didn't stretch to pick him. I just feel we need DE and WR much more then DT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Fair point, honestly didn't even realize he was listed as questionable as well, could still be for both of them in case either isn't able to go tomorrow. That Canales said something like "we'll check him out tomorrow to make sure he's able to go" still makes me think they were still expecting him to play, as that would be a weird way to phrase it if they felt he was more likely to not be playing. Still just hoping it would be like when a player feels something in a game, gets checked out, but goes back in.  And since it was just practice, once he felt anything, they just shut him down for the day to be safe.
    • The Golden Calf of Bristol was Mr Clutch time.  It’s the Skip Bayless argument.  Someone how being trash all game doesn’t matter….if you can cherry pick one random play late 
    • I remember all those names now that I see them. I remember Graham missing the kick in GB too. Swiss cheese memory. 
×
×
  • Create New...