Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

we're interested in colt mccoy


Fiz

Recommended Posts

balls

NFL.com's Jason La Canfora reports that the Panthers are interested in Texas QB Colt McCoy.

"The team has enough interest to consider moving up into the second round on Friday," La Canfora writes. The Panthers are currently sitting at No. 48 overall, with 15 picks between them and the first selection in round two. McCoy seems unlikely to get by both the Browns and Bills in the top 42. Carolina, though, may have too many position needs to give up later-round picks. We'd say they could dangle a player to move up, but they have hardly any depth.

Source: NFL.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With all of the WR dropping to the 2nd I just don't think it's a good idea. Next year looks like a pretty good year for QBs...

Unless we can somehow pull off a Walker to Minnesota trade like Dallas did back in the day I hope it's just rumors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Panthers are interested in Texas QB Colt McCoy, according to a league source. The team has enough interest to consider moving up in the second-round on Friday.

The Panthers currently have the 16th pick in the second round (48th overall) and it would likely take some maneuvering to get ahead of teams such as the Browns, Raiders and Bills, who are still looking for quarterbacks.

The Panthers parted ways with long-time QB Jake Delhomme earlier this year. Matt Moore is currently at the top of the team’s depth chart.

http://blogs.nfl.com/2010/04/23/panthers-interested-in-texas-qb-mccoy/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're right.

I wonder what people would say if we traded Marshall plus a later pick and keep the 48th but acquire another pick to get McCoy?

Then again, we gave up a first to move up in the 2nd last year, so I think it's really unlikely.

BTW, if anyone saw what Philly gave up to move up for Graham in the 1st... We got robbed the last two years...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're right.

I wonder what people would say if we traded Marshall plus a later pick and keep the 48th but acquire another pick to get McCoy?

Then again, we gave up a first to move up in the 2nd last year, so I think it's really unlikely.

BTW, if anyone saw what Philly gave up to move up for Graham in the 1st... We got robbed the last two years...

First-round pick (No. 24):

» Third-round pick (No. 70):

» Third-round pick (No. 87)

To move up 11 spots in the first round.

Looking at what Denver gave up to grab The Golden Calf of Bristol isn't as bad as I thought.

They swapped fourth rounders moving down from 114 - 119 and gave up a 2nd and 3rd. Basically a 43rd and 70th for the 25th pick. Picked a bad player with the pick though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I thought he had a few really nice flashes.  I can see him showing out this year 
    • I have heard that before--when standing in front of a full body mirror at Old Navy.  I said it, actually. Seriously, Let's go on what we know. There is reason for optimism that exceeds random opinions and negativity: 1. Last year, the offense was the priority and the interior offensive line was the focal point. Morgan addressed it in free agency and the draft. They improved.  2.  Last year, Canales pulled Young after 2 games and replaced him with an established veteran.  Instead of giving up on Young, he developed him, primarily focusing on his footwork and timing.  Continued development in his fundamentals should result in improved play.  (this is significant because some athletes rely on natural ability and do not adapt well.  They resort to old habits. This means that Bryce is "teachable" and is willing to face adversity and fight through it.  That is what you want in a QB.) 3. Morgan drafted a raw talent at WR; and we all knew he was raw.  Huddlers are already calling it a bust, but his productivity numbers were in line with the other WRs drafted around where he was drafted.  So, yes, he was a bit disappointing, but what part of "Raw" is not understood here?  Evil Bryce, then inconsistent Dalton, then good Bryce--all while facing the top defensive backs--and let's not forget about his lingering injuries--and we should understand XL's productivity.  Morgan was looking for a home run based on XL's 1-season productivity and his freakish athleticism, but I always thought we would not know what we have until year 2.  TMac alone will make XL better--a solid #2. 4.  If you blame Morgan for drafting XL, you must give him credit for making Coker a priority free agent.  In my view, he addressed WR in 2024 pretty effectively in the long view.  5.  Let's look at the rest of the draft.  Brooks?  The best RB in the draft in round 2?  Morgan was attempting to build a solid run game behind Bryce.  Wallace was a very solid third round pick at LB. Sanders is a strong TE for a fourth round pick. 6.  Not much is being said about the development of Chau Smith-Wade.  His improvement mirrors Bryce Young's, actually.  In his first 8 games, his PFF rating was 36.5.  In the final 9 games, his PFF rating was 66.7.   7.  With so many needs, Morgan hit the UDFA market with success. In addition to Coker, Demani Richardson got 400+ snaps and had a 60.1 PFF grade, including an interception. 8.  In free agency, Morgan spent big bucks on Guards, a move that made his QB better. He added David Moore, Nijman,  He signed Clowney, Wonnum, Robinson, Jewel, Chaisson, Fuller, Scott, D. Jackson, Dionte Johnson, etc.  A few years of Fitterer left him with more holes that players.  Some did not work out, but he did all this on a budget (after he splurged on Lewis and Hunt).  It is hard to get a free agent to come to a team that loses--so in some cases, Morgan had to overpay or accept questionable players. Morgan's first year as a GM demonstrated an understanding of the game like we have not seen since Polian, before his lost it. Canales, on the other hand, should be rated by the improvement of players.  Zavala, Ekwonu, Mays, Young, Smith-Wade, Coker, Wallace--all improved.  He had to overcome major losses such as D. Brown, Shaq, Dionte Johnson, Corbett--and we saw growth.  Despite all this team went through, after 8 games of disarray, This team finished 4-5 with close losses to both Super Bowl teams.  Frankly, I do not know how he did it. This year was better.  The WR room is solid with depth.  The OL room is solid with depth.  The TE room is as good as it has been in a while.  The RB room has the potential to be as good as it was when we had 28 and 34.  DBs?  Better.  DL?  Better.  Edge?  better.  The bottom of the roster?  Much better. We really don't know what we have yet, and that makes this offseason exciting.      
    • Here you go. 2 yards. Bryce Sneak.mp4
×
×
  • Create New...