Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

BOBCATS Should Go After DWADE


Recommended Posts

This Lineup Would be Sweet(and yes I change some of the starters around I think its a better line up) I think we could contend for a title with wade here in charlotte.

pg: DJ

sg: wade

sf: Jackson

pf: Thomas

c: Chandler

bench: felton wallace diaw hughes nazy

Completely plausible.... and you neg repped me for claiming that 10 mil a year is too much for a MLB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

not going to happen anytime soon, i think alot of people don't understand the salary cap and the way things work in the nba, to sign wade we would need to clear somewhere between 16 and 20 million dollars in cap space(hard to do since mostl nba contracts are 100% guaranteed) so we can't just clear cap space the way the nfl does, and wade would have to want to be here(love charlotte but miami is on whole different level esp. if you have a little $$)and either way the only team to win a championship with a big time free agent in the last 15 or so years were the lakers(shaq)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

MJ said yesterday on the radio that he plans to make a couple of moves this offseason to get better and go deeper in the playoffs next season.

And when he said.. "go deeper in the playoffs" that kinda made me a little excited that maybe.. he's aiming to make a big splash. But with the cap, I don't see what much he can do really.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...