Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Steve Smith Chat Wrap From ESPN


solorca

Recommended Posts

This happened a few days ago, but I didn't see it posted. Maybe it was and I just missed it. If so, feel free to act like a nerd and point it out to me!

Some interesting notes..

Steiny (NYC): Would you call DeAngelo Williams a major Pro Bowl snub?

Steve Smith: No, not yet. A lot of the guys that got picked over him did the same thing that he did for a few years. We have a lot of Pro Bowl RBs in the league and you can't take all of them...it takes a year or two to get your chance to get in.

J: Where would you draft yourself next year in a fantasy draft?

Steve Smith: I would draft myself in either the second or third round.

Geoff (NY): Steve, do you think there is anyone in the NFL that can cover you one-on-one?

Steve Smith: I think there may be a few guys. But this league is not really about one on one coverage like it used to be.

Steiny (NYC): What are you guys going to have to do to beat the Arizona Cardinals?

Steve Smith: Well the D needs to stop the passing game and if they can do that, the offense needs to capitalize on those opportunities they give us.

http://proxy.espn.go.com/chat/chatESPN?event_id=24484

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i like smitty's harsh honesty on the d-will question, but have to disagree with him. the pro-bowl is a year to year award not a career award or culmination of 2 or 3 year award. d-will > portis.

That's just his style. I think he would say the same thing about himself (even though he made the Pro-Bowl in his rookie season).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i like smitty's harsh honesty on the d-will question, but have to disagree with him. the pro-bowl is a year to year award not a career award or culmination of 2 or 3 year award. d-will > portis.

No, it's about gaining recognition and sustaining it. Right now the fans know DeAngelo's name, next year if he's among the league leaders he'll be a shoe-in. Had they known his name last year, he would have been in this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i like smitty's harsh honesty on the d-will question, but have to disagree with him. the pro-bowl is a year to year award not a career award or culmination of 2 or 3 year award. d-will > portis.

everybody knows the probowl is popularity contest. its like running for class president in middle school. geez!! if DeAngelo continues his level of performance for a string of years, he'll be in the probowl for at least one more year after that performance comes to an end IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I mean, but there is ample evidence that exists currently in the NFL and historically that if you have a talented or moderately talented team then one of the biggest upgrades you can make is at QB. It yields the biggest returns. I don't think even Prime Greg Olsen is going to make Bryce suddenly look like a stud QB. We have invested immense amounts of money on the OL and tremendous amounts of draft resources on WR's. And have added an additional extremely capable RB. At some point, the main problem is Bryce. We are at that point.  That being said, we don't need to go "Full Bryce" again and sell the farm to upgrade at QB. Be intelligent and patient. Try to get better by whatever means become available WHILE continuing to make the roster better. At the bare minimum, you slowly build an upper half of the NFL talented roster that is at least a potential draw for some free agent QB's. IMO, Bryce is clearly not the answer. I don't think anyone in our organization thinks that way but if they do, it's not the end of the world. Throw as many reasonable darts as you can through free agency and the draft until either you get a bullseye or a top 10-15 option becomes available in free agency.
    • I think the best way to make Bryce better is to make everyone around him better.  This is why I advocate for a stud (top 5, eventually) TE.  I mean, when we have been a good franchise, we have had a stud TE (Walls, Olsen) and ILB (Beason, Mills, Morgan, Luke, etc) so it is in our DNA.  Expect us to address these areas this year.  (An Olsen or Walls would help Bryce a lot).  In terms of productivity, I think we are going to work with XL for one more season and ride the TMac / Coker momentum.  Where else could we find a position to improve productivity?  TE.  A position that caters to Bryce's style and shortcomings, a stud TE gives him another weapon he has not had. The Panthers run a lot of 2-TE sets (I have seen 3) and they have a blocker (Tremble) who is great in the run game, a balanced TE (Evans), and Sanders is supposed to be the pass-catching TE. He had 340 yards last season and he has about 170 this year.  If we are going to play around with XL for another season, it only makes up to add to Bryce's weapons in a way that does not put XL on the bench, basically ending his development. It makes sense to bring in a pass-catching dawg.  The way the offense is designed, I see carrying 4, but its not ideal. Having said that, I mentioned Oregon's Sadiq in another thread, but I am starting to warm up to Vanderbilt's Stowers and, in the Olsen/Walls mold, I kinda like Endries from Texas.  Of course, Stowers is probably going in round 2 and Endries in 3 or later. I still say, 5 months before the draft, that I would not be surprised if we take a TE very early.
×
×
  • Create New...