Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Strange observation


charlotte49er

Recommended Posts

Okay, so Sunday night I have on ESPN just for background while I am reading.

They have Jacksonville St vs Georgia Tech in college woman's softball. Then I change the channel to Fox Sports and they have on the WNBA. After a few minutes (which as about all I can stand of the WNBA,) I switch back to women's softball.

This is when it hits me. Every young lady on the softball teams, both sides, are wearing make up! I'm talking eye liner, mascara, lip gloss, the whole nine yards. They look more like they are going on a date than they do to play softball.

Then I turn back to the WNBA. Not one of them is wearing a hint of make up. (Some of the WNBA players it would really help!) I watch the young ladies for about 5 more minutes to confirm my theory.

Turn back to college women's softball, and sure enough, one side brings in a relief picture and she's wearing make up!

I'm not sure it's whether the make up is because the young ladies are on TV or it's an ESPN thing. Every time a young lady comes to bat, they show her picture along with her stats.

Another observation, the stands look packed. Turn back to the WNBA, no makeup and about 250-300 people in the stands!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've notice that too about softball. Also, most softball chick are hot. You have your usual fat lesbians too. But most of them are really kind of hot.

The pitcher that Georgia Tech brought in to put the game away, Hope Rush, is a BIG girl. But did she ever have a chest on her! I was amazed that she could pitch with breasts so big!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm really not stressing about upgrading from Bryce. I'm frustrated with our inability (or refusal) to recognize overall bad QB performance and failure to seriously address the issue. QB is the most impactful position on the field, and we're not only settling for what we've been given to this point, but we've rewarded it with a fully guaranteed 5th year extension for a player that's never played 2 NFL franchise QB quality games back to back in 3 seasons. I can't understand how that's ok from a coach's or GM's viewpoint. Successful franchises don't do things like this. It just doesn't make sense.  We do not have a top half of the league QB right now. Since we don't have that player, we should be looking for him. Pickett isn't it. Grier isn't it. Bryce hasn't proven he is yet. Until you have that sure fire franchise QB, you keep looking. You're not consistently making the playoffs, a deep run, or a SB appearance without one.  What's the worst that could happen? We end up with 2 potential number 1 QBs? How horrible. 
    • Easy to understand Pickett, if this is anywhere close to on point. Canales wants to get as close to Bryce as he can- get the pace and timing in the throws as close a he can to Bryce. So the other players don’t have to adjust so much, to a new guy.       If Cam was the 1, he would look for a rocket arm.  But Bryce is the 1. Look for limited in the same way.  Low velocity, plenty of air under it, feels just like home when Picket comes in. And you have the guys on the second team not having such a radical adjustment (if they have to play) like with Dalton to Bryce.    Enter Grier. I guess we will collect those types.   
    • Best part is if we draft him, we can also use him as our fourth and one QB sneaker
×
×
  • Create New...