Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Strange observation


charlotte49er

Recommended Posts

Okay, so Sunday night I have on ESPN just for background while I am reading.

They have Jacksonville St vs Georgia Tech in college woman's softball. Then I change the channel to Fox Sports and they have on the WNBA. After a few minutes (which as about all I can stand of the WNBA,) I switch back to women's softball.

This is when it hits me. Every young lady on the softball teams, both sides, are wearing make up! I'm talking eye liner, mascara, lip gloss, the whole nine yards. They look more like they are going on a date than they do to play softball.

Then I turn back to the WNBA. Not one of them is wearing a hint of make up. (Some of the WNBA players it would really help!) I watch the young ladies for about 5 more minutes to confirm my theory.

Turn back to college women's softball, and sure enough, one side brings in a relief picture and she's wearing make up!

I'm not sure it's whether the make up is because the young ladies are on TV or it's an ESPN thing. Every time a young lady comes to bat, they show her picture along with her stats.

Another observation, the stands look packed. Turn back to the WNBA, no makeup and about 250-300 people in the stands!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've notice that too about softball. Also, most softball chick are hot. You have your usual fat lesbians too. But most of them are really kind of hot.

The pitcher that Georgia Tech brought in to put the game away, Hope Rush, is a BIG girl. But did she ever have a chest on her! I was amazed that she could pitch with breasts so big!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Checking in on Jacob Rodriguez’ following list.. what do we notice? https://x.com/bthatespanthers/status/2046663230819356980?s=46&t=xeIgh_-Vr2aKxBkBJdfnKA
    • Im not angry. Im disappointed. I want to win. Anyone who has watched Bryce play the last 3 years and thinks that this team has in any way seriously addressed the glaring deficiencies in our QB room is deluding themselves. It's been explained ad nauseum how our FO has protected Bryce from feeling even slightly challenged or pressured. A GM without an interfering owner would have brought in another QB to at least give the team a better chance at winning. We just gave an extension to a QB that only got 3k yards on the last play of his 16th game of the year. Indy admitted AR wasn't good enough by bringing in Jones to compete for the starting role. Tennessee drafted Ward to replace Levis. Stroud hasn't repeated his 1st year and Mills' performance was decent when he filled in after Stroud's injury and some were calling for him to remain starter. His future there is still in question even with a 5th year. We should have done the same, especially given that Bryce was benched.  Bringing in Grier is just another glaring billboard pronouncing the obvious. Dave Tepper still has his hands in the daily operations of this team. He controls the QB room because Bryce was his pick. Until Tepper finally admits that Bryce has barely lived up to the standards of a NFL Qb, we're going to spend our days reminiscing of when we were mediocre and finished 9-7.  It's just discouraging. We'll address every position on the field except the one with a glaringly obvious shortcoming. I had hoped Tepper really had backed off. Bryce's 5th year, Dalton's 2 year contract then trade, Kenny Pickett, Will Grier, Jack Plummer, and  Hendon Hooker say otherwise. It already feels like it's going to be a hard year of Panthers football to watch.     
×
×
  • Create New...