Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Randy Moss.....best ever (besides Rice)

mywinke

By mywinke,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

thefuzz Mentor

thefuzz

Posted
Posted

That is a joke. I guess Jerry Rice wasnt a complete WR because he couldnt go up and come down with a job ball then. I guess Hines Ward isnt a complete WR because he wont beat you deep.

I'll take a guy who puts up HUGE stats that gives his team an advantage by constantly needing double coverage, over your "complete WR".

No you wouldnt. Torry Holt has done nothing the best 3-4 years. Defenses dont prepare for Holt like they do Moss.

Yes, I would.

Check out his first 9 seasons in the NFL. Also check out how many times you have heard teammates call him out.

See how many games/plays he has loafed through his routes and plays.

Is he as talented? NO.

Is he the better player/team player? Certainly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
AceMan Experienced

AceMan

Posted
Posted

No offense to Smitty (My fav. player on the team)...

But the fact is that Moss is a better WR than S.Smith in their respective careers...Smitty might not even get into the HOF and Moss is pretty much a lock at this point.

You might not like the fact that Moss has an attitude and "coasts" from time to time. But, you gotta respect the man and his talent. I don't like the fact Smitty had to play with fringe talent at QB his whole career...oh well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jon Snow
      2026 Mock Drafts

      By Jon Snow · Posted

      I would say that he's pulling things out of his ass to get people to visit his site.
    • strato
      OFFICIAL 2026 Undrafted Free Agent Thread

      By strato · Posted

      Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • outlaw4
      Dan had a great draft

      By outlaw4 · Posted

      If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
×
×
  • Create New...