Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Another Jake thread (optimistic, give it a chance)


Proudiddy

Recommended Posts

After much thought, and believe me, I mean MUCH thought. I decided to try and look at the bright side of what may be in 2009. During the game and after the game, I was leading the pack in the "Bench/Release Delhomme" front... But, after having time to take it all in and look at the entire game and the bigger picture, plus the majority of the player's reactions... I thought about something in regards to Jake.

I was watching the PIT/SD game and I was amazed as usual with Big Ben's performance. I started thinking about how the Steelers have been so good for so long and how Mr. Richardson has said that they are who we aim to model ourselves after as a franchise...

Well, that brought me back to the performances of the QB's they've had compared to ours. And I remembered a NOT-SO-HOT year that Big Ben had. That year? 2006. What was significant about that year and why he performed so poorly? Well, that summer was when he had gotten into the motorcycle accident that could've ended his life and/or career. Reports at the time said his injuries were non-life threatening and non-career threatening. Yet, later Ben contradicted this and said he was minutes from dying had paramedics not stopped his bleeding at the accident. He rushed back from surgery and was back in time to play the preseason and throughout the regular season.

I remember watching the games that year, and he just looked OFF. REAL OFF. I particularly remember a horrible game he had against Oakland that year being played repeatedly on highlights for the multiple INTs he threw. I just remember thinking he didn't look the same and hope he bounced back. Pittsburgh finished well below their own standards that year at 8-8.

Well, I say all this because that year, Ben had the worst year of his career to thus point statistically. It was the only year in his career that he threw more INTs than TDs and it was his lowest QB rating of his career at 75.

I'm not saying Jake is Ben Roethlisberger. But I am saying that historically, they are winners. I've presented all this because throughout some of the first game, and then most definitely after the first game, Jake just didn't look the same. There was some flashes of his old play that led us to a Superbowl and an NFCCG. But, ultimately, he looked OFF. He's always had issues with inaccuracy bouts throughout his career, and has always been a bit of a gunslinger and took chances. But, he NEVER took "chances" like he did Saturday night. What I'm saying is... Jake was faced with a possible career ending injury with his elbow. He missed everything but 3 games last year, and hurried back with rehab to come back and play quicker than anyone anticipated.

So... My question is, could it be there is a link between bad play and a QB coming off a career threatening ordeal/injury? Sure, they say they were fully recovered, but Ben and Jake are both guys that aren't gong to come out of a game unless they're taken out on a stretcher. Maybe it's psychological, maybe they're pressing... I don't know. But, I think there is a significant link between a player, specifically a QB, who recently faced the prospect of not playing again (or perhaps that they aren't invincible), and coming back too quickly. Because I had thought all year, we could not truly trust Jake if we were turned into a purely passing team. I had never felt like that any other year he was the starter. He looked confused, out of rhythm, antsy, and nervous in the pocket all year. He made EXTRA bad reads compared to previous years...

I'm not defending anything he's done, but I'm saying that being that Foxy has already said he is the starter next year, Smitty still trusts him, etc., there is a bright side. Ben bounced back big time. Hopefully, Jake will do the same. Thank you for reading my novel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You do make some good points, and obviously most players will have their up and down years.

I think the frustration arises from two things:

1. We don't ask a lot of Jake. We have great running backs and receivers. When we ask Jake to make what would be just a handful of passes to most quarterbacks, he should be able to.

2. As you've said, Jake has always had accuracy issues, though some seasons more than others. What concerns Carolina fans is if this is just going to keep rearing its ugly head and costing us the game.

If we could get our defense back to 2003 form, I'd feel a lot better about keeping Jake. After defending Jake for so long, I can't help but think we might have better options--both short and long term--in McCown or Moore.

That being said, with each day after this loss I feel a little less angry about Jake and am slowly starting to realize that he may be our best option right now and for next season.

Live by the sword, die by the sword.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Optimism! yeah

My only problem is that Delhomme actually looked good until the first Tampa Bay game. So, in my view, he faded through the year. His injury did not necessarily happen in a "wreck" type situation. He just flat out looked bad this year and not just "off". If you look pre-injury, his normal self was nothing more spectacular than what we saw this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Optimism! yeah

My only problem is that Delhomme actually looked good until the first Tampa Bay game. So, in my view, he faded through the year. His injury did not necessarily happen in a "wreck" type situation. He just flat out looked bad this year and not just "off". If you look pre-injury, his normal self was nothing more spectacular than what we saw this year.

Delhomme was awful the first 2 games, until the 4th quarter each time-respectively.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was thinking about this today. Maybe something WAS still wrong with Jake. Maybe he will be back to his old self by September. However, we can't rest our hopes on that. We have a VERY tough schedule next season. We need to have another viable option if Jake can't cut it. At the very minimum we are in need of an upgrade at backup QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Congratulations do they know who the father is?
    • In my opinion Fitterer was probably right about not paying McCaffrey. Now not wanting to "pay RBs" in my opinion isn't something you want to set in stone, to me it all comes down to the individual.
    • Maybe I'm just not understanding, but everywhere that I have read says that signing bonuses go against the cap prorated by as much as five years. The following example uses Andrew Luck's rookie contract as an example. "Take Andrew Luck, the first overall pick in the 2012 NFL draft. Luck signed a four-year contract with the Colts worth $22.1 million and included a $14.5 million signing bonus. Rather than a $14.5 million cap hit in 2012, the Colts spread out his signing bonus over the life of his contract. The hit against the cap would be $3.625 million per year over four years instead of a direct cap hit of $14.5 million directly in 2012. This gave the Colts more leverage and cap flexibility in signing other players." https://www.the33rdteam.com/nfl-signing-bonuses-explained/ I don't know why some of you think that signing bonuses aren't counted against the cap over the length of the contract, but whatever.   "The bonus with a signing is usually the most garish aspect of a rookie contract. Bonus is the immediate cash players receive when they ink a deal. It factors into the cap, but only for the whole contract duration, in terms of salary cap calculations. In the case of Bryce Young’s $24.6 million signing bonus, that’s prorated to approximately $6.15 million per season over a four-year deal. This format allows teams to handle the cap and provides rookies with some short-term fiscal stability, which is important given the high injury risk in this league." https://collegefootballnetwork.com/how-rookie-contracts-work-in-the-nfl/ I understand how signing bonuses can be a useful tool in order to manage the cap, and as one of the article suggests, signing bonuses may become important if you have a tight cap, but the bill is always going to come due. I'm not necessarily referring to you Tuka, but it seems to me that others simply don't want to understand that fact which is why they're reacting to what I'm saying negatively. How odd. In any event, I have a better general understanding of why signing bonuses are used now, and it's generally to fit salaries under the cap. Surely players, whether they be rookies or not, love a signing bonus because they get a good portion of their money up front. This in turn gives them more security and probably amounts to tax benefits as well. I also understand why teams would not want to use signing bonuses, particularly for players or draftees who have a higher probability of being gone before a contract even ends.
×
×
  • Create New...