Would you put Vaughn on the PS so far???

[Zod]

Only his second year in the league, I believe this makes him eligible, no?

[Wither]

Only his second year in the league, I believe this makes him eligible, no?

Looked good last night, but against what, 3rd and 4th string?

[CharlotteBeer.com]

I think based on his talent, it would behoove us to put him on the practice squad, but I'd have to see what other players we were thinking about stashing away on there to justify taking the place of another player.

[theedaddy]

collecting talented RBs, no one does it better. skipper must have influence. i thought have the panthers have the best RBs, as a group. goodsen and sutton could be #2, looking through my panthers shades. im starting to think, this maybe the best group in nfl history :eek::eek:

yes for me.

in the little ive seen, vaughn deserves a PS check. i love to see how he feels today, dealing with pain is #1 my RB handbook.

[Brooklyn Bully]

No.

[Mr. Scot]

Practice Squad? Sure, but I don't think he'll last there.

Have to admit I worry that he'll be this year's Jamal Robertson, though.

[Mutant_Enemy]

I'd say yes, as he looked decent last night. With the amount of running plays we call, I think we have to maintain a healthy pipeline of ball carriers.

Would it be to much to carry 4 RBs and possibly 2 FBs on the 53 man roster to start the regular season, with Vaughn on the PS for good measure? Ideally we could instead stash Jackson on the 5 man ps, but I doubt he would clear waivers.

(and Fiametta's strong performance was also nice to see; more plays called for the FB spot might help keep double trouble fresh later in the season)

[Darth Biscuit]

I guess that's the good thing about being stacked at RB... too bad we don't have any WR's we can talk about like this...

[CharlotteBeer.com]

I'd say yes, as he looked decent last night. With the amount of running plays we call, I think we have to maintain a healthy pipeline of ball carriers.

Would it be to much to carry 4 RBs and possibly 2 FBs on the 53 man roster to start the regular season, with Vaughn on the PS for good measure? Ideally we could instead stash Jackson on the 5 man ps, but I doubt he would clear waivers.

(and Fiametta's strong performance was also nice to see; more plays called for the FB spot might help keep double trouble fresh later in the season)

I don't think we'd keep Vaughan over Goodson if we were to keep four backs.

Personally, even though I like Jackson, I feel we should keep four backs and then Fiammetta. Sutton has shown he can fill in at fullback occasionally (as has Dante Rosario).

[gmonet]

Only his second year in the league, I believe this makes him eligible, no?

I have been touting this guy here, since we met his family and watched him at Woffard...it was very subjective not objective...but he looked good. Then we watched him last night, and I agree with you - he's certainly PS material, and might get some back up possibilities. He wants on this team, and told me so!

All that said, he got us some good first downs and played some ST's too I think...gotta re-watch the game tonight!

VOTE VAUGHN!

[CharlotteBeer.com]

Come on, guys: if you're going to campaign for the guy, at least spell his name correctly.

It's "Vaughan."