Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Goodson as a WR


smash_n_dash

Recommended Posts

I know it was probably talked about alot on here last year but I haven't seen talk of it this season, probably because he has been injured. But he catches pretty much everything thrown his way and he is a speedy/agile guy. Throw him in as the #2 WR next week and see how he does. On a side note though, Jarrett caught three of the 4 passes thrown his way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would like to believe that he would contribute a lot as a receiver, but most of his catches are coming from out of the backfield. Who knows how he would do if he was jammed at the line or covered by a reliable corner. I'm not sure if I could trust this staff in converting a player to a new position. Yea it worked for Davis, but I think that's because his abilities were naturally for a LB not safety. Martin has done good also, but I think it would be harder for a player who is naturally a RB to convert to receiver and be able to routinely run crisp routes, than it is to convert a CB to Safety or a Safety to LB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would like to believe that he would contribute a lot as a receiver, but most of his catches are coming from out of the backfield. Who knows how he would do if he was jammed at the line or covered by a reliable corner. I'm not sure if I could trust this staff in converting a player to a new position. Yea it worked for Davis, but I think that's because his abilities were naturally for a LB not safety. Martin has done good also, but I think it would be harder for a player who is naturally a RB to convert to receiver and be able to routinely run crisp routes, than it is to convert a CB to Safety or a Safety to LB.

Excellent post. A thought out one too... :cool:

I have to agree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While I agree that the transition to WR may be a hard one from any position, I think RB->WR would be the easiest. A RB already knows routes, knows how to catch, and with experience at pass protection a RB shouldn't have much trouble getting off the line. At the very least see if he can be plausible for a WR position. Why load up talent at the RB position (2 superb RBs, and 2 to 3 good RBs) but only have one WR worthy of mention?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know nothing of actually playing football (and little of football anyway :P), but I wouldn't really say RB's know a lot about routes like a WR does. They are used to a very dynamic environment (as in, blocks being made, a hole opening up, etc.) whereas receivers run specific routes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We can use him like Saints did Bush. But he's perfect in the slot. I would like that to be his main position, because pretty soon if we keep bringing up him off the bench for 1 catch passes people will catch onto it

They NEED to start taking a look after what we're witnessing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know it was probably talked about alot on here last year but I haven't seen talk of it this season, probably because he has been injured. But he catches pretty much everything thrown his way and he is a speedy/agile guy. Throw him in as the #2 WR next week and see how he does. On a side note though, Jarrett caught three of the 4 passes thrown his way.

of course he catches screens and little passes but can he run routes, catch in traffic, etc?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Them playing behind a couple more seasoned guys until they get familiar with coverage and pace of play is a good thing though. We really can use them to spell the other guys, and in situational ball especially with Ransom on possible run/blitzing downs.
    • They fuged him over so bad to help cover their bad judgement. About time he got a little something to wrk with. 
    • I think completion percentage is a bit of a overinflated stat for a qb too. People place to much stock into it. So many factors to consider with it : receivers, how many attempts are made deep, the defense etc all play a roll in it. When it’s considerably low 50% or less the QB accuracy can come into question. But I don’t think it’s necessarily one of the better percentages to put so much importance into for that position. General effectiveness is far more indicative of the QB you have. First downs, 3rd and 4th down conversions, points scored and clutch plays IMO is how you grade a QB. Always bothered the poo out of me how people downed Cam for his completion percentage and that’s what they used to disregard him as an all time great. Dude damn near averaged 3tds to 1 turnover a game and was an obvious difference maker for us.
×
×
  • Create New...