Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers Stock Watch

Laetitia

By Laetitia,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Brooklyn Bully Newbie

Brooklyn Bully

Posted
Posted

Its been evident since day 1 that Darin gnatt never wanted Matt Moore to be our QB. He probably still think Delhomme give the Panthers the best chance to win

Soooo, you think his stock went up or is holding steady then. Wait...I see your user title. Question answered.

Matthew Erickson Moore

Do you get mad when the other team tackles the pretty boy too hard? Do you fuss? God forbid a "journalist" have an opinion about a Panther that isn't positive! Oh n0es! Bad, "journalist", bad! ::hits Gantt with rolled up newspaper::

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Carolina Mike Experienced

Carolina Mike

Posted
Posted

Its been evident since day 1 that Darin gnatt never wanted Matt Moore to be our QB. He probably still think Delhomme give the Panthers the best chance to win

During week 12 I think Delhomme does give us the best chance to win. It will be great to see him throwing INT's for TD's that benefit the Panthers this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Panther59 Newbie

Panther59

Posted
Posted

Quarterback Matt Moore: We get it. He misses Smith, they aren’t game-planning, blah blah blah. At some point, he’s going to have to do something. Jimmy Clausen was no better.

I can agree with the first two sentences but the third sentence is pretty much bullshit. IMO clausen has looked pretty capable in his limited time and has displayed a ton of potential thus far. Has he made a couple of mistakes? Yes, but that's pretty much it he's made 2 crucial drive killing mistakes via interceptions but otherwise has done exceedingly well for a rookie QB in this league, no matter the circumstance. Will he start this year? Probably not, this is Matt Moores team. But....

Just imagine Clausen(I'm talkin' 2011-2012 in this scenario) behind a capable OLine still able to lean on our solid running game to keep the defense honest throwing to Smitty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Dpantherman Newbie

Dpantherman

Posted
Posted

Soooo, you think his stock went up or is holding steady then. Wait...I see your user title. Question answered.

Do you get mad when the other team tackles the pretty boy too hard? Do you fuss? God forbid a "journalist" have an opinion about a Panther that isn't positive! Oh n0es! Bad, "journalist", bad! ::hits Gantt with rolled up newspaper::

God forbid I have an opinion you don't like...and while I'm on it, he admitted the pass protection was horrid and had nothing positive for the receivers, so how is Matt Moore supposed to look good? His stock isn't down, its where it was before the preseason began. And no matter what any thinks, he'll be the starter week 1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted

God forbid I have an opinion you don't like...and while I'm on it, he admitted the pass protection was horrid and had nothing positive for the receivers, so how is Matt Moore supposed to look good? His stock isn't down, its where it was before the preseason began. And no matter what any thinks, he'll be the starter week 1.

Gantt and some of the other guys were always real quick to knock Moore ever so slightly last year before Carolina really turned it on...

Gantt also was already playing the should of kept Jake card on Twitter. You would be foolish to think the preseason game 1-2 Delhomme/Moore is what you will see when actual football is played. No gameplanning is going on and Carolina's one man recieving corp hasn't even played.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Brooklyn Bully Newbie

Brooklyn Bully

Posted
Posted

God forbid I have an opinion you don't like...and while I'm on it, he admitted the pass protection was horrid and had nothing positive for the receivers, so how is Matt Moore supposed to look good? His stock isn't down, its where it was before the preseason began. And no matter what any thinks, he'll be the starter week 1.

Of course he'll be the starter. But it's obvious you can't be objective at all concerning Matt. Why even have this lame stocks article to begin with? It's pre-season, everyone is getting used to gearing up again, no one plans for blitzes, and crappy players are out there, right? Why does Matt (in your eyes) get a pass on a stock list while others should be put on it? Both our QBs have looked like crap. There are reasons for it, sure. So technically their stock has dropped. Can't get any more simple than that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Sloth Apprentice

Sloth

Posted
Posted

Gantt and some of the other guys were always real quick to knock Moore ever so slightly last year before Carolina really turned it on...

Gantt also was already playing the should of kept Jake card on Twitter. You would be foolish to think the preseason game 1-2 Delhomme/Moore is what you will see when actual football is played. No gameplanning is going on and Carolina's one man recieving corp hasn't even played.

Gantt has a point. Moore has yet to look like a starting NFL QB through 2 preseason games. He just looks like another guy out there.

As for Gantt disliking Moore.. last season, absolutely. He's actually been way more critical of Clausen this off-season and been pretty supportive of our starting QB. He makes fun of anyone suggesting Clausen might challenge Moore and has been pretty positive regarding Moore's camp. He's just (rightfully) been unimpressed with Moore's showing as a starting QB against other teams.

Also, it's hardly like he's slurping Clausen. He flat out says in the same paragraph that Clausen has been no better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Diehardpanth02
      Week 3 PFF Grades

      By Diehardpanth02 · Posted

      Them playing behind a couple more seasoned guys until they get familiar with coverage and pace of play is a good thing though. We really can use them to spell the other guys, and in situational ball especially with Ransom on possible run/blitzing downs.
    • strato
      Defense is turning around?

      By strato · Posted

      They fuged him over so bad to help cover their bad judgement. About time he got a little something to wrk with. 
    • Diehardpanth02
      panthers offense 30 of 32 in yards per play

      By Diehardpanth02 · Posted

      I think completion percentage is a bit of a overinflated stat for a qb too. People place to much stock into it. So many factors to consider with it : receivers, how many attempts are made deep, the defense etc all play a roll in it. When it’s considerably low 50% or less the QB accuracy can come into question. But I don’t think it’s necessarily one of the better percentages to put so much importance into for that position. General effectiveness is far more indicative of the QB you have. First downs, 3rd and 4th down conversions, points scored and clutch plays IMO is how you grade a QB. Always bothered the poo out of me how people downed Cam for his completion percentage and that’s what they used to disregard him as an all time great. Dude damn near averaged 3tds to 1 turnover a game and was an obvious difference maker for us.
×
×
  • Create New...