Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is it coincidental?


TylerDurden

Recommended Posts

The 3-4 is liked by many because it can create more confusion which can hide weaknesses and create matchup problems.

.

I would rather hide my weaknesses, than just let someone exploit it all game long.(hey didn't we just see that happen?)

Plus, shouldn't you be trying to get match ups that are in YOUR favor?

I mean, why would you line up in and know your in trouble?

Our defensive philosophy(or ineptitude) is pretty much opposite of what you just posted.

We line up in the same poo no matter what, and never adjust to ANYTHING.

We can't do a 3-4 even if we want to, because our coaches are too stupid, and aren't good enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually the trend has been to go away from the 3-4 in the past 6 or 7 years since it hard to find the right personnel ( a 4-3 is what most colleges play so it is much easier to judge actual performance rather than potential which is what you have to do with a 3-4 since most guys haven't played it. Plus new players take time to learn it.

A 4-3 is a fine defense. But a good coordinator uses different looks, sometimes rushes 3 or 4 or 5, changes the scheme etcetera. Until we have a coach that can or will do that, we will never be good. It is no secret, teams and other players have said for years that our scheme is vanilla but due to personnel we were hard to beat. As our talent pool has changed we are still easy to figure out but now we are not so loaded with individual talent that we can't be easily beat as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No defence is better than the other. Both can be very good or very bad.

Just look at the top ten defences this year : Six of them are 4-3 and 4 of them are 3-4. Pretty even to me.

http://www.nfl.com/stats/categorystats?tabSeq=2&defensiveStatisticCategory=GAME_STATS&conference=ALL&role=OPP&season=2008&seasonType=REG&d-447263-s=TOTAL_YARDS_GAME_AVG&d-447263-o=1&d-447263-n=1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would rather hide my weaknesses, than just let someone exploit it all game long.(hey didn't we just see that happen?)

Plus, shouldn't you be trying to get match ups that are in YOUR favor?

I mean, why would you line up in and know your in trouble?

Our defensive philosophy(or ineptitude) is pretty much opposite of what you just posted.

We line up in the same sh*t no matter what, and never adjust to ANYTHING.

We can't do a 3-4 even if we want to, because our coaches are too stupid, and aren't good enough.

A 3-4 team looks for matchups in terms of pass rushing. No defense just lines up and doesn't look for mismatches.

The 3-4 is often envied by those whose team doesn't run it. For whatever reason there is a misconception that the 3-4 is always succesful, however the 49ers weren't, they switched to 4-3 and had so much more success. The Jets were bad last year, the Browns aren't good, the Cardinals ran it last year and weren't impressive, they've switched back to 4-3 now.

Both require the right players, and right now we don't have the front four you need to have in order to be dominant against the pass and run. The Titans had NINE defensive lineman with at least one sack, of their 44 total sacks, four of them came from non defensive lineman. Getting 44 sacks when you send four guys that much is a huge advantage, and a reason why they had 20 interceptions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That the two top defenses (Steelers and Ravens) in the league run a 3-4 defense? I've never been big on the 3-4, I've always liked the 4-3 a little better myself (maybe b/c I understood it better)... But, the more I think about it, it may be time for change. The Steelers, Ravens, and Patriots always have great defenses and they have ran the 3-4 for as long as I can remember.

Que Bill Cowher threads on 3.....2.....1...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, I remember Capers ran a 3-4 when he was here IIRC (I was only 10-12 years old). I don't think it would be that hard to convert if we wanted, it would just take the right COORDINATOR, who presently isn't on the staff.

Brayton, Kemo, and Lewis could play the 3 down lineman. Davis, Beason, Diggs/Connor, Peppers could play the linebackers. I don't think it would be that hard. I think that Pep actually longs to play in a 3-4 like Joey Porter or Demarcus Ware.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, I remember Capers ran a 3-4 when he was here IIRC (I was only 10-12 years old). I don't think it would be that hard to convert if we wanted, it would just take the right COORDINATOR, who presently isn't on the staff.

Brayton, Kemo, and Lewis could play the 3 down lineman. Davis, Beason, Diggs/Connor, Peppers could play the linebackers. I don't think it would be that hard. I think that Pep actually longs to play in a 3-4 like Joey Porter or Demarcus Ware.

It would be like learning German when you speak English. Yea you can do it but its gonna take a while. The Jets did ok there first season but they didnt do so swell the next one. Dallas had problem for a while and SF and CLE are horrible running it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Apparently the defense Panthers have runned last few seasons is taking a while ,ands still a work in progress .

And Apparently Panthers don't have the players to run that defense.

So why not try 3-4 with differnt D coaches ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

JMO.....I think the shortage is in the coaching of a 3-4. At least that's what I've heard. I have to agree to some degree with Skull....run what ever ya want, just run it a whole lot better than you have been. With the offense we have I just think an attacking defense would serve us better.

disclamier....for any of these thoughts or wishes to come true John Fox has too go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, I remember Capers ran a 3-4 when he was here IIRC (I was only 10-12 years old). I don't think it would be that hard to convert if we wanted, it would just take the right COORDINATOR, who presently isn't on the staff.

Brayton, Kemo, and Lewis could play the 3 down lineman. Davis, Beason, Diggs/Connor, Peppers could play the linebackers. I don't think it would be that hard. I think that Pep actually longs to play in a 3-4 like Joey Porter or Demarcus Ware.

Okay, go look at the weight and size of all the Steeler's linebackers and the Raven's line backers.

Also, look at the height of all the 3-4 OLBs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lamaar Woodley 6'2 265 Julius Peppers 6'7 283

James Farrior 6'2 243 John Beason 6'0 239

Larry Foote 6'1 239 Adam Seward 6'3 250* Need help here

James Harrison 6'0 242 Thomas Davis 6'2 240

Aaron Smith 6'5 298 Tyler Brayton 6'6 280

Casey Hampton 6'1 325 Kemo 6'5 350

Brett Keisel 6'5 285 Damione Lewis 6'2 300 *Need help here as well

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Really? You don't see why a team can't draft a QB in the 1st round while then starting their former #1 overall pick over them while on the last year of their deal? It puts the team in a TERRIBLE place no matter how the season goes.  If Bryce sucks, you have to answer questions as to why he was still on the team to begin with, let alone starting over the rookie.  If he's good, then you run into the situation the Vikings were in last offseason with sticking with the rookie contract or the the guy who just performed instead of said young QB. It's one thing when teams keep a vet around as a bridge QB, it's something entirely different when that QB is still only in their mid 20's and was taken #1 overall by that team.   That just doesn't happen and not sure it ever has in NFL history before.
    • What is the alternative? - BY, will not play for less then his perceived contract (just like Cam Newton did). So you pay him top of market as befitting a 1st round, Heisman winning, playing birthing QB would get. Or you cut him. - Then we are forced to either sign a stop gap QB / previously failed QB and try to fix him or you spend a 1st round pick and draft a guy, basically resetting the team.  The reality is that we all want a top 5 QB. The problem is there are only 5 of those guys in the world and drafting, even #1 overall doesn't guarantee that.  The other problem is the NFL market. Young QB get paid. Even an average, young QB gets top of market deals. I know a lot of people here think we could sign him to an 'average QB contract' but thats not reality. Didnt happen with Cam wont happen with BY.  So we could let this season flush out and he is again a middling QB. But then we cut and restart or accept it is what it is (including compensation) and build a team around what we have.  My money is on the latter. 
×
×
  • Create New...