Oh Gantt...You Tool

[weyco2000]

I'm confused? Who runs the "Mountaineer" package...Jarrett? :smilielol5:

I would imagine, by showing it, they intend to use it, right? So if he is inactive, whats the purpose of wasting our practice time, it's supposed to give the opponent something else to prepare for. :confused:

[MaineManPanther]

Thats why you have a pure ST guy at a different position. Say..Witherspoon. Who showed a whole lot more than Martin, who showed nothing. Doesn't make since you're gonna bench 2/3 of the WRs you picked over someone that can only play ST.

They would be regulated to the last string WR, who, especially in this offence, would get hardly any playing time. So if thats the case, why have them active over a guy who can contribute every game by playing ST?

[KillerKat]

They could use 4 WRs, rotate the last 2 guys in the slot. Martin would be the 5th and just contribute on ST. Or if they had Spoon, all the DPs could be rotated. If you want to develop your talent and help your 5 year dry streak of not finding a #2 and 7 year dry streak of not developing one, you get them playing time. Not sit them on the bench.

[woody]

why would we not put armanti or at least gettis in tho....martin did nothing this preaseason..

Because as a wide reciever you need to be able to tackle

[MaineManPanther]

They could use 4 WRs, rotate the last 2 guys in the slot. Martin would be the 5th and just contribute on ST. Or if they had Spoon, all the DPs could be rotated. If you want to develop your talent and help your 5 year dry streak of not finding a #2 and 7 year dry streak of not developing one, you get them playing time. Not sit them on the bench.

Thats a different argument. Im simply arguing, that given that only 4 Wr's will be active, it makes more since to have a good ST player active, then WR's who would be in the game for a handful of plays a game , if that.

[Woodcookedbbq]

Why don't we just rotate them in and out. Keep 'em guessing.

[weyco2000]

Thats a different argument. Im simply arguing, that given that only 4 Wr's will be active, it makes more since to have a good ST player active, then WR's who would be in the game for a handful of plays a game , if that.

Last time I looked, both Gettis and AE played on ST also. (AE and Gettis also led the team in receptions in the preseason.) BTW this is a "guess" by a idiot named Gantt! I agree with KillerKat, the time is now to develop a #2 and #3, not a guy who caught 1 pass and had 3 solo tackles on ST (Martin). How about we just put DJ on the inactive list, because thats what he is on the field!

:cheers2:

[DickolausJ]

Martin would have played during preseason more if he didn't have a cast on his hand. Everything will be fine. Unbunch your panties all.

[weyco2000]

Well the question would be is Martin still in a cast?

8 Players will be inactive, Pike will be 1 and the other 7?

1) Pike

2) Duckworth

3) Neblett

4) Norwood or another LB or both

5) Sutton (Is he still injured?)

6) A Safety (Puts you down to 7 deep in the DB)

7) WR (Please God, be #80)

8) ?

This is going to be interesting!

[woody]

What if Todd Carter is inactive and we let Jason Baker try kickoffs. If he sucks at it than bring in Todd next game. Emphasize the "What if"

[CatMan72]

Martin was having excellent mini-camp and OTA practices before he broke his hand in TC, the work he was doing was even praised by Smitty.

The answer to this is simple, Martin can run down punt/kick returns - something we're incredibly bad at.

[beastson]

So we only activating 3 wr ???

Get ready to run all game, I can see the gameplan now since NYG linebacking core is weak

[beastson]

Oh I forgot about Jarrett

[Delhommey]

What exactly am I supposed to be angry about?