Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Gettis starting over Jarrett?


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

Magnus pointed out (rightly) that Jarrett's catches generally come when teams are playing prevent. Last week was no exception.

Jarrett has no one to blame but himself.

nah, he just rarely plays. He has played 2 snaps. Wide open on his first one. Jarrett just is better when Carolina is running more pass oriented plays. He isn't good in 2 WR sets where he has to get off the line quickly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've begun to think they're only holding on to him in the hope that they'll be able to trade him for something if some other team loses a receiver to injury.

Granted, he could still show up, but we only have three receivers today, and we're sticking with two receiver and two TE sets. Doesn't look good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think, to a point, it might also just be that against Tampa 2, he'd always see that press. And any receiver that might get a CB to back off, as much as we're running, is a good thing. And he looks eager to block, whereas Jarrett? I dunno.

to hell with it. A lot of people around here champion Jarrett like he is something, or has ever done anything here. Practice, preseason, anything. I'm a fan of this team. I don't care if this particular player is the one getting the chances. Good work rook, earning some time and some targets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've begun to think they're only holding on to him in the hope that they'll be able to trade him for something if some other team loses a receiver to injury.

Granted, he could still show up, but we only have three receivers today, and we're sticking with two receiver and two TE sets. Doesn't look good.

Trade him to Pete Carrel for a broke juggs machine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I see what you did there
    • Yeah the only way current set up is fun is if every year a different tiny school builds a super team and makes a run. You just need 1 rich guy to say you know what would be funny, if I drop 30 million and my school has a shot at a national championship.   They won't ever do it but put some sort of tiered salary cap in place and sign them to 4 year deals. You can only transfer up or down tiers no lateral moves because mean ole coach at texas doesn't play me enough so I'm going to Tennessee. So a player at prairie view can transfer to texas and get paid more or a player from UNC can transfer to UNCG because he isn't getting playing time. If a guy is transferring "up" he can get a salary bump if the team has salary cap space. A guy transferring down has to stay at the same salary as he signed his 4 year deal for so the lower tier team would have to have the cap space to sign him. It would stop the money chasing for lateral moves but allow guys who improve massively at lower schools to make more money as juniors and seniors and hopefully keep more guys in one place because the contract is for 4 years.
    • Bryce youngs first starts for 3 years   51 of 103 49%     153 yards avg 6 ints 2 tds   But this is the year he turns it around
×
×
  • Create New...