Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Would you trade...


Matt Foley

Recommended Posts

You see, the thing is Stewart is much younger than Williams, but then again, there's the health problem.

In my opinion Williams is the more rounded back, and he has plenty of tread left to go. He is worth a 5+ year contract. We can still keep Stew for a while until his contract is up then maybe trade because he will warrant a big contract as well.

Keep the two RB for as long as possible, when your run game is your only game why screw with it?

If anything they need to get the lazy o-line to get off there ass and block.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hidden

Anyone saying Bryant or Jackson aren't worth it are crazy..

on top of that, anyone really like "They already have RBs".. well no poo, you motherf**kers should 1st realize this is hypothetical and quit being so damn close minded..

has any reports came out about Dallas trying to trade Dez or Philly to trade Jackson?

you know why? cause it aint happening! y'all kill me with your close minded remarks some times.. like, you can't even talk hypothetical cause you're so ready to bash any and all topics..

how about you catch up to the conversation and just answer the question.. "nah man, they got like 50 RBs, that aint happening".. lol.. for reals? it aint happening? you mean the lack of reports gave that away? or the fact that they are their star receiver and they would never make that trade anyway?

Way to put words in my mouth. I don't think Jackson or Bryant would be more valuable to the team than he is. I do however think an elite qb would.

that's insane.. DWill can't run because we NEED more receivers.. There is NO way DWill would be more important than a star receiver.. plus both are young and will hold the #1 WR spot for years..

and elite qb? come on man... lol.. we NEED receivers... Clausen is going to be just fine.. if he gets some weapons...

Dez Bryant = T.O. 2.0

They are the Mariah Carey and Madonna's of the NFL. Fun to drool over but way too much diva to stick with (eventually you get sick of their sh*t) I think I made a pretty good analogy there.

this is the type of poo that is hilarious.. Dez Bryant has shown just as much drama in the NFL as Clausen has.. and both have had a lot of "rumors" flying around that aint poo. and carrying pads is hardly an argument since hte guy just wants to play... so leave that poo to the drama queens to argue over.. (not the Dez Bryants)

Link to comment

Anyone saying Bryant or Jackson aren't worth it are crazy..

on top of that, anyone really like "They already have RBs".. well no poo, you motherf**kers should 1st realize this is hypothetical and quit being so damn close minded..

has any reports came out about Dallas trying to trade Dez or Philly to trade Jackson?

how about you catch up to the conversation and just answer the question.. "nah man, they got like 50 RBs, that aint happening".. lol.. for reals? it aint happening? you mean the lack of reports gave that away? or the fact that's their star receiver and they would never make that trade anyway?

Way to put words in my mouth. I don't think Jackson or Bryant would be more valuable to the team than he is. I do however think an elite qb would.

that's insane.. DWill can't run because we NEED more receivers.. There is NO way DWill would be more important than a star receiver.. plus both are young and will hold the #1 WR spot for years..

Stewart and Goodson will be just fine, and the addition of Jackson/Bryant will open the field up- to, ya know, RUN the ball efficiently..

Dez Bryant = T.O. 2.0

They are the Mariah Carey and Madonna's of the NFL. Fun to drool over but way too much diva to stick with (eventually you get sick of their sh*t) I think I made a pretty good analogy there.

this is the type of poo that is hilarious.. Dez Bryant has shown just as much drama in the NFL as Clausen has.. and both have had a lot of "rumors" flying around that aint poo. and carrying pads is hardly an argument since hte guy just wants to play... so leave that poo to the drama queens to argue over.. (not the Dez Bryants)

and who drools over Madonna and Mariah Carey.. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In my opinion Williams is the more rounded back, and he has plenty of tread left to go. He is worth a 5+ year contract. We can still keep Stew for a while until his contract is up then maybe trade because he will warrant a big contract as well.

Keep the two RB for as long as possible, when your run game is your only game why screw with it?

If anything they need to get the lazy o-line to get off there ass and block.

Hypothetically speaking i would rather keep the harder runner. You guys say Stewart has injury problems, so do williams. Last year Stewart ran better than Williams. But i rather keep both. Just teach them that puttin their heads down and push the line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

and who drools over Madonna and Mariah Carey..

haha precisely. Madonna is too old for anyone to drool over(T.O.) Bryant has some maturity issues which I don't think is a huge problem for a rookie to overcome but I'm not sure Dallas is where he will overcome them. Besides, Steve Smith would have broken his nose if he refused to carry his pads haha

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Desean Jackson wants a new deal....not happening in Carolina. Dez Bryant- Jerry Jones won't even ship out that POS Roy Williams, why would he trade Dez who he drafted in the 1st round?

A new contract to Jackson wouldn't happen this year in Carolina.. but it very well could happen next year..

then again, I agree with you.. any way to upgrade our team seems to pass us by in the WR realm...

and yeah, this thread is hypothetical.. so you pointing out that Dez would never get traded is right on point.. who would do that with a star receiver you picked up on a rookie contract? ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just because all draft picks are a gamble doesn't mean you don't have a better chance at hitting on a better player the higher you're drafting. It would literally be like someone saying, I'll give you 1 or 2 free spins on a slot machine, and you say you'll take the 1 because you're not likely to win anything anyways with 1 or 2, so why bother? The Cowboys desperately wanted T-Mac, but because they were 4 picks behind us, they weren't able to get him.  If you told Cowboys fans that had they lost 2 more games last year in a lost season, that it would get them the player they wanted so badly, would they in retrospect go back and lose those games to get their guy? 95% of them would take that trade off in a heartbeat, and the others who wouldn't are the fans who would rather enjoy an extra win or two in a poo season to then set themselves up to be better for the next decade. I also think the fans who argue against this thinking, get too caught up in the "well that means you're going to be rooting against us late in the season even if we still have a shot at the playoffs." Which isn't true, it's saying if you're telling me right now we'd make the playoffs but lose in the first round, that I'd rather end up 8-9 or 9-8 and just miss the playoffs because in our opinion, the benefits that come along with that outweigh the benefit of the players getting 1 game of playoff experience.
    • In relation to tanking. I think you can count on one hand the number of people here who actually want us to lose football games. When accounting for it across the fanbase it amounts to maybe 2% of the entire Panthers fanbase. But you engage with some internet trolls and think haters are coming out of the woodwork and hey look at that it's all a conspiracy that leads to Bryce Young haters. Do you hear yourself sir? If it sounds ridiculous that's because it is. I mean at this point do you see Bryce haters in your dreams? As far as the culture of this franchise goes we seem to be doing better in that department via what we are building right now and with the people we have in place. But we also shouldn't just make assumptions just yet either. The rubber still needs to meet the road. And going back to previous seasons I think we can acknowledge although tanking obviously isn't a thing there were some times where we thought our culture was improving but really it wasn't. Yes I'm looking directly at some of those wins under Wilks. If the culture had truly changed we would not have lost to the Steelers who have been mediocre for years at home the way we did and they were starting Mitch Trubisky ffs. We did not change our culture for the better and we won games that ultimately meant nothing. It was just a brief mirage. We've done this for years now. The harsh truth of the matter is the Panthers have not had a winning season or been to the playoffs in going on 8 years but in those years they've been trying to convince themselves they aren't poo but in the process all they've done throughout most of that time period is squander better draft position and we were still the worst team in the league for our troubles. At the end of the day we should be able to just be adults and reconcile with that. And no that isn't being "pro tank" or any other boogeyman term it's simply recognizing reality.
    • He's an asset in a game manager role. But as soon as you have to ask him to go out there and try to make plays and not just take what the defense is giving him... well, Darnolding happens.
×
×
  • Create New...