Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is an offseason "big splash" a necessity?


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

No big splashes please. Our two biggest acquisitions last off-season were Landon Johnson and DJ Hackett. Then we went and got Brayton and some rookie out of Iowa and they went and contributed far more in their first four games each than our big signings did all year combined.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No big splashes please. Our two biggest acquisitions last off-season were Landon Johnson and DJ Hackett. Then we went and got Brayton and some rookie out of Iowa and they went and contributed far more in their first four games each than our big signings did all year combined.

Valid point, but we didn't have any big losses last year either.

Does the loss of Peppers necessitate a big name replacement?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, just because he lose a big splash player doesn't mean we need to sign one as well. Hell, who knows, Charles Johnson could become an elite DE next year. Creating big name players you draft is far better than signing them in the offseason.

With that said, some on here have speculated that Balitmore might be a suiter for Peppers. I wonder if a trade involving Suggs and Peppers would be possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Suggs is indeed intriguing. My question is will he be able to retain his performance in a DE position? He played it well in college at Arizona State and he is a speed freak off the end but will his tenure in the 3-4 have affected his vision from the line. My guess would be that it hasn't but its just a guess. Also im almost positive that he was used on the line in Bmore but not absolutely sure.

In short I wouldn't be opposed to a straight up trade but i gotta go check his salary figures

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Suggs is indeed intriguing. My question is will he be able to retain his performance in a DE position? He played it well in college at Arizona State and he is a speed freak off the end but will his tenure in the 3-4 have affected his vision from the line. My guess would be that it hasn't but its just a guess. Also im almost positive that he was used on the line in Bmore but not absolutely sure.

In short I wouldn't be opposed to a straight up trade but i gotta go check his salary figures

Suggs would be a great addition. He's the kind of tough rangy athlete required to cover short distances and tackle the ball carrier for this react/bend but don't break scheme that doesn't put these players in ideal position to make a play.

Hey, at least this time, when Trgovac drops him into coverage, for whatever unknown reason he likes linemen to do it so often, this guy has had experience at it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The era that you played in, and, more importantly, who you played with actually matters. Honestly, that's why these issues will be debated forever, as it's just difficult to say that this person or that person is better when you're discussing the passage of time. As for me, after Rice, Moss and maybe Megatron and T.O., there's probably a dozen or so guys that can be argued about to the cows come home. Personally, I'm not putting Fitz, Harrison, Johnson, Evans, or especially D-Hop, Jefferson, Chase or Hill definitely in front of Smitty (and Colston ain't even in the discussion). Context and all that stuff actually matters. Things like the triple crown matter. 
    • Some of those guys? Yeah honestly you can.  I would 100% take Steve Smith over Larry Fitzgerald, Harrison, even Mike Evans. He is 100% a better player than those guys in his prime. If you look at the numbers Smith is historically under targeted in comparison to his contemporaries. He was only targeted 150 times or more only once in his career. Fitzgerald for example was targeted well above that 9 different seasons. Had Smith played with Peyton, Brady, Greatest Show on Turf, or even with Warner in Arizona he would broken records. His 2008 season was ridiculous accumulating 1400 yards in 13 games on less than 80 receptions. All time he also lost a season due to injury in 04, barely played WR as a rookie. Got robbed of 1k season with Clausen. Thats easily another 1800yds minimum that should have been tacked on to his #s. The only guys I’d say for certain are better than Smith are Rice, Moss, TO, Megatron, Julio Jones, Antonio Brown.
    • I parked in this lot a few times. It would take over and hour to get out of that lot after games. Never again
×
×
  • Create New...