Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

After watching Cardinals game.. I realize our coaches....


Zaximus

Recommended Posts

Are pretty terrible.

The Eagles went to half-time down about the same amount as us. While they ended up losing, by a touchdown, their coaches obviously made needed adjustments in the locker room and came out and made it a ball game.

I don't care what anyone says, our coaches get out-coached all the time, and I wish we could get some guys in here that make adjustments. I agree with some other posters, it's going to be a long year with the same coaches, maybe we'll get lucky and pre-game plans work out throughout all the games, but then again, it may be another 2008 and we fail to make adjustments.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really? What I saw was that the Eagles defense gave up 1 fewer point than the Panthers did and got burned by Fitz just as bad, even though they came in the game telling everybody that they were gonna double him all day, plus the Cardinals didn't have the advantage of the other teams offense turning the ball over 6 times today.

The only reason this game was closer than ours, was that the Eagles offense was able to move the ball and put points on the board.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the difference was the qb. mcnabb got them back in the game after the d blew it in the 1st half. jake stopped us (as did not running it) on O, the cards didnt. thats the biggest difference.

and mc we moved it twice into the redzone only to get picked off, which was a huge difference than mcnabb and co getting it in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the difference was the qb. mcnabb got them back in the game after the d blew it in the 1st half. jake stopped us (as did not running it) on O, the cards didnt. thats the biggest difference.

and mc we moved it twice into the redzone only to get picked off, which was a huge difference than mcnabb and co getting it in.

This is not ALL McNabb. The coaches, again, called plays etc to CAPITALIZE on his skills.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

McNabb had one phenomenal quarter and three iffy ones. You don't win the big games that way.

Most of the day his passes were off. Commentators made mention of it a lot, also of the fact that he's 1-4 in the biggest games of his career (1-5 if you count the Super Bowl).

McNabb is essentially the QB version of Marty Schottenheimer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

McNabb had one phenomenal quarter and three iffy ones. You don't win the big games that way.

Most of the day his passes were off. Commentators made mention of it a lot, also of the fact that he's 1-4 in the biggest games of his career (1-5 if you count the Super Bowl).

McNabb is essentially the QB version of Marty Schottenheimer.

Most of the day his passes were dropped. He brought his team back to take the lead in the 2nd half. On the final drive of the game with 3 minutes left in the game not a single running play was called as Donovan was asked to pass the ball every single play. 375 yards passing and 3 TDs, McNabb was not the problem today. Keep in mind he did all this without an Anquan Boldin & Larry Fitzgerald to throw to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most of the day his passes were dropped. He brought his team back to take the lead in the 2nd half. On the final drive of the game with 3 minutes left in the game not a single running play was called as Donovan was asked to pass the ball every single play. 375 yards passing and 3 TDs, McNabb was not the problem today. Keep in mind he did all this without an Anquan Boldin & Larry Fitzgerald to throw to.

McNabb's never been especially accurate, not like a Manning, Brady or Palmer. He gets good stats because he plays in a West Coast offense based on high percentage short passes. That, plus his ability to run makes him a good QB for a WCO (same factors as Garcia) but take him out of that system and you'd see a difference (again, same as Garcia).

He's great for what they do, but all WCO quarterbacks are overrated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Cards actually scored more points in the second half against the eagles than they did against us. How is that a good second half adjustment? That was minus all the turnover possessions we gave them. We got our butt handed to us not because of the coaches but because Jake had a horrible day and turned it over 6 times.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Cards actually scored more points in the second half against the eagles than they did against us. How is that a good second half adjustment? That was minus all the turnover possessions we gave them. We got our butt handed to us not because of the coaches but because Jake had a horrible day and turned it over 6 times.

Please. the Cards were calling dive plays the whole time after the half, they were running out the clock in the 3rd quarter against us. if they wanted to score another 20 points they could've.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please. the Cards were calling dive plays the whole time after the half, they were running out the clock in the 3rd quarter against us. if they wanted to score another 20 points they could've.

Well they wouldn't have been able to do that had we scored when we had the ball rather than give it right back to them. I just stated a fact. The turnovers cost us that game more than the defense did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Give me Mitchell Evans over T Sanders in this run heavy offense any day of the week. 
    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
    • Really impressed how the bottom six have looked the past couple games
×
×
  • Create New...