Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How can anyone justify Moore over Clausen at this point?


Carl Spackler

Recommended Posts

You've backed it up with relevant stat. I applaud you on that no doubt. You made a valid point. But what I'm trying to get you to see is that even with Moore's turnovers we are still a better offense, hence the more ppg. But if you want to base it on only a page of the book and not the whole chapter then be my guest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Right, 6 out of the 59 passes Moore has attempted this year have resulted in an interception :eek:

3 out of the 91 passes Clausen (the rookie) has attempted this year have resulted in an interception.

2 out of the 59 passes Moore has attempted this year have resulted in a TD.

1 out of the 91 passes Clausen has attempted this year have resulted in a TD.

Let's also consider that 22 of the 91 total passing attempts by Clausen came from the Bears game, with no Steve Smith on the field while both of the TD's Matt More has thrown this year have been to Steve Smith.

Oh, and Moore's average yards-per-throw is 5.8 while Clausen's is 5.0. Moore's completion percentage is 43% while Clausen's is 47%

Questions?

Total Interceptions are way over blown, 4 out of his 6 interception were in the fourth quarter when we were well behind and he was trying to make something happen. When the game was in question which was the first half Moore had 1 Int and Clausen has 2.

Lets look at more relevant stats. Passing yards per game- Clausen 90, Moore 116.

First downs as a percentage of third down throws- Clausen 7 of 29 (24%)

Moore 10 of 22- 45%

How about third and medium or longer (3rd and 6 or more)-

Moore- 5 out of 11- 45%, Clausen 2 of 19- 10%

TDs in the first half- Moore 2, Clausen 1

Yards per attempt- Moore - 5.8 yards an attempt, Clausen 4.9 yards an attempt

If you look beyond the interceptions which were largely in junk time and focus on much more important stats like first downs, moving the chains, TDs when the game is close, you find that Moore is doing much better than Clausen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You've backed it up with relevant stat. I applaud you on that no doubt. You made a valid point. But what I'm trying to get you to see is that even with Moore's turnovers we are still a better offense, hence the more ppg. But if you want to base it on only a page of the book and not the whole chapter then be my guest.

Again so if Matt start are we going too make the playoffs?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've figured out what Matt's real problem is... that goofy looking "japanimation" helmet he's wearing this year.

Did you notice Carson Palmer switched out of that helmet after his performance against us?

Tom Brady was wearing that same kind of helmet in the preseason and switched out of it to his old helmet design before the regular season started.... hmmmm

Next time I'm at practice, I'm going to suggest Matt go back to his old helmet... LOL

I noticed Moore put the sweatband back on his right forearm after the Giants game in an attempt to move back towards his 2009 look... I wonder if he's even considered the helmet, I'll ask.

Matt's a baseball guy, those guys are superstitious as hell. Just remember to credit me if Matt switches back to his 2009 helmet and returns to 2009 form.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Passer Rating Differential = Offensive Passer Rating  - Defensive Passer Rating    Offensive Passer Rating = how efficient your team’s QBs are. Defensive Passer Rating Allowed = how efficient opposing QBs are against your defense. The larger the positive differential, the more dominant your team’s passing game is relative to opponents’ passing success. Conversely, a negative differential means your defense is getting carved up or your offense isn’t efficient enough. Almost every Super Bowl champion from the 1970s to the present day finished near the top of the league in DPRD (Defensive Passer Rating Differential). https://coldhardfootballfacts.com/stats/passer-ratings-differential Look at where we are #16 and we have a Negative DPRD (-0.36). Every team above us has a a positive DPRD, is .500 or better, and still in running for a playoff spot.  Look at the chart. The best teams in the NFL have the highest DPRD. Only 2 teams below us with a negative DPRD are still in contention or the playoffs: #19 San Francisco (-4.44) and # 21 Tampa Bay(-6.62). And, Tampa has no shot if they fail to beat us down the stretch at least once. The teams with the highest negative DPRD always seem to be at the bottom of the standings. I didn't learn about this stat until 15 years ago. It's amazing how it always seems to accurately predict who will be in playoff contention year end and year out. 1 = Los Angeles Rams 111.76 85.23 26.53 2 3 Philadelphia Eagles 100.00 75.57 24.43 3 1 Seattle Seahawks 100.30 77.42 22.88 4 1 Buffalo Bills 104.20 82.66 21.54 5 1 Los Angeles Chargers 91.46 71.19 20.27 6 1 Houston Texans 90.70 72.40 18.30 7 1 Detroit Lions 110.41 94.40 16.01 8 1 New England Patriots 109.10 96.75 12.35 9 3 Green Bay Packers 102.95 92.09 10.86 10 1 Denver Broncos 89.21 78.78 10.43 11 1 Indianapolis Colts 95.12 85.91 9.21 12 = Pittsburgh Steelers 97.42 89.90 7.52 13 = Baltimore Ravens 93.87 86.91 6.96 14 2 Jacksonville Jaguars 88.07 81.23 6.84 15 4 Chicago Bears 89.48 88.70 0.78 16 2 Carolina Panthers 88.77 89.13 -0.36 17 2 Arizona Cardinals 93.49 95.79 -2.30 18 1 Kansas City Chiefs 88.85 92.46 -3.61 19 1 San Francisco 49ers 96.87 101.31 -4.44 20 1 Atlanta Falcons 87.50 92.50 -5.00 21 3 Tampa Bay Buccaneers 89.77 96.39 -6.62 22 = Dallas Cowboys 98.69 108.92 -10.23 23 = New York Giants 87.74 98.84 -11.10 24 1 New Orleans Saints 84.97 96.17 -11.20 25 1 Miami Dolphins 88.33 102.37 -14.04 26 3 Minnesota Vikings 75.03 90.31 -15.28 27 3 Las Vegas Raiders 83.50 99.14 -15.64 28 = Cincinnati Bengals 84.51 104.46 -19.95 29 2 Washington Commanders 87.24 107.74 -20.50 30 3 Cleveland Browns 70.46 91.41 -20.95 31 1 New York Jets 77.75 104.86 -27.11 32 = Tennessee Titans 76.27 106.03 -29.76  
    • Yeah and truthfully I’ll be ok with that as long as the talent and culture is building. 
    • We have been on the right side of one score games.  But like minny a few years ago and KC, we know that isnt sustainable and we probably will revert back to the nfl mean.  Which could mean a poo season incoming if this offense doesnt figure poo out
×
×
  • Create New...