Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

We threw 41 times. The John Fox irony: "Too agressive?".


PantherFanForLife

Recommended Posts

Irony #1: I know I'm not alone when I say I got sick and tired of John Fox's conservative coaching style years ago. In the last year of his contract, there have been spurts where he finally starts coaching like most of us have been asking him to for years.

Irony #2: Don't get your hopes up for a repeat. Even though it worked, according to his press-conference, John Fox believes Sunday's play-calling was "too risky" and thus too aggressive! WHAT THE f**k?

I thought that call on 4th down was the correct call but in his press conference he said he wishes he didn't have to do that. And do what Fox? You would have kicked a field goal and still needed a touchdown. That was the correct call and it could have very well been a touchdown.

So knowing that he believes last Sunday was "too aggressive" what are the chances we will continue this? Will we go back to conservative Fox ball where we pass 15-20 times a game max? What are the chances we are going to see another game where we pass 41 times this season?

Do you believe that going back to passing 15-20 times per game is a mistake and a regression in our passing game?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Irony #1 I thought that call on 4th down was the correct call but in his press conference he said he wishes he didn't have to do that. And do what Fox? You would have kicked a field goal and still needed a touchdown. That was the correct call and it could have very well been a touchdown.

He meant that he would rather not be put in fourth down situations, as in get the TD before then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That wasn't the only thing he was referring to though when he said we took too many risks.

And I don't consider that a risk at all in that situation.

It was obviously the right call and even he is saying that. What he would like is to have scored the TD on 3rd down and not have to go for it on 4th.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That wasn't the only thing he was referring to though when he said we took too many risks.

And I don't consider that a risk at all in that situation.

And how do you know what he meant beyond the obvious meaning?

I wish I could see straight into a coach's mind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

he threw 41 and completed 68% of them I do think it has alot to do with confidence in the QB. You won't win without consistent play in that department. One reason we threw so many times is because we can't run. but we kept trying it which was the key to keeping the D honest. i think i just went on a tangent. nevermind :leaving:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

he threw 41 and completed 68% of them I do think it has alot to do with confidence in the QB. You won't win without consistent play in that department. One reason we threw so many times is because we can't run. but we kept trying it which was the key to keeping the D honest. i think i just went on a tangent. nevermind :leaving:

Yeah, I agree, but we shouldn't stop doing that even when our run game starts working. That's been the biggest problem with this coach and this team. We need to figure out how to do BOTH!

I mean if we can do this when our run game is NOT working, when other teams are putting this much pressure on our passing game...NO reason why we shouldn't do that when we have both going full speed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Giants and Steelers both won Superbowls with conservative offenses. And both of them, along with the Jets and Kansas City are doing pretty well this year with conservative offenses.

Conservative offenses work great, if they are combined with solid defense and they have the ability to pass when needed.

I guess "conservative" is all perception.

O wait...it's you. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think the qualification has changed over time though. A deep ball play used to take 4 to 6 seconds for the receiver to get to that spot on the field. Now a receiver can be there in 2.5. That's less time than most QBs have to set and throw. In my mind a deep route takes time to develop. A crossing route and a deep route can't take the same amount of time at full speed. You can have 4 deep balls on the same drive,  almost 5 if you do 5 20 yard throws goal line to goal line. That doesn't even make sense when you say it out loud. 
    • The sad part is it looks manicured enough that he's aware it's running away from him.  Also, I just wanted to give you some fun loving grief on King Haynes today having a chance to throw a game winning TD, and was wildly errant, and ultimately picked off to end the game.  So happy I won't have to hear anything else about The Golden Calf of Bristol lite ever again watching college football.
    • I just think Panthers believe in Bryce far more than the fans do and he is most likely going to be the QB at least the next two seasons. the real shot of us moving from Bryce is not getting an extension, till then they are going to give him every chance to succeed and I just want to win. 
×
×
  • Create New...