Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Thoughts on Boobs...


Zod

Recommended Posts

I think its a safe bet that I have seen more boobs of everyday women (not strippers) in person than anyone else on this site.

Here is a new theory I am working on.

The size of the boobs is not as important as the ratio of the size of hips/waist to boobs. That is, a girl that is a size 2 in jeans can have a small B cup and look much better than a girl that is a size 8 with a C cup. Yes, her boobs are bigger but the ratio of waist to boobs is not as appealing.

It is for this reason that no one is interested in seeing big boobs on obese women. Even though the boobs are very large, the belly is also very large thus the appeal is just not there.

I am submitting this postulate to a few peer reviewed publications for further analysis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My aunt told me last night that my tits looked bigger. I told her if I lost a little weight, they probably would go down a little bit. She told me the first place where women gain weight is in their boobs. I told her I should just gain more weight then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would prefer the size 8 woman with the C cup. I don't really care fore women that look like they just went to a Holocaust Summer camp for vacation.

lol size 8 is a little past the holocaust.

your thinking more size 0.

some people are just small though and cant help they have to wear small clothes, but that doesn't mean they are deathly skinny!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Checking in on Jacob Rodriguez’ following list.. what do we notice? https://x.com/bthatespanthers/status/2046663230819356980?s=46&t=xeIgh_-Vr2aKxBkBJdfnKA
    • Im not angry. Im disappointed. I want to win. Anyone who has watched Bryce play the last 3 years and thinks that this team has in any way seriously addressed the glaring deficiencies in our QB room is deluding themselves. It's been explained ad nauseum how our FO has protected Bryce from feeling even slightly challenged or pressured. A GM without an interfering owner would have brought in another QB to at least give the team a better chance at winning. We just gave an extension to a QB that only got 3k yards on the last play of his 16th game of the year. Indy admitted AR wasn't good enough by bringing in Jones to compete for the starting role. Tennessee drafted Ward to replace Levis. Stroud hasn't repeated his 1st year and Mills' performance was decent when he filled in after Stroud's injury and some were calling for him to remain starter. His future there is still in question even with a 5th year. We should have done the same, especially given that Bryce was benched.  Bringing in Grier is just another glaring billboard pronouncing the obvious. Dave Tepper still has his hands in the daily operations of this team. He controls the QB room because Bryce was his pick. Until Tepper finally admits that Bryce has barely lived up to the standards of a NFL Qb, we're going to spend our days reminiscing of when we were mediocre and finished 9-7.  It's just discouraging. We'll address every position on the field except the one with a glaringly obvious shortcoming. I had hoped Tepper really had backed off. Bryce's 5th year, Dalton's 2 year contract then trade, Kenny Pickett, Will Grier, Jack Plummer, and  Hendon Hooker say otherwise. It already feels like it's going to be a hard year of Panthers football to watch.     
×
×
  • Create New...