Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Progression of David Gettis


Carl Spackler

Recommended Posts

Question for anyone who has the game on DVR...was Gettis just not targeted like he should be against STL, or was he covered well and unable to get open most of the game? I'd like to see film of him last week to find out whether he was getting overlooked or Spagnuolo watched his tendencies against SF and he was found out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it has to do more with LaFell being a better blocker and Fox liking that attribute in a #2 receiver since we are a "run first" team. I was appalled at his lack of snaps/targets considering his previous performance but after Fox said the SF game was "too aggressive" it shouldn't surprise me at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The better question is...why can Matt Moore see the field better, and spread the ball around better in one game....and not the next?

Was the rams pass rush that much better that moore was as comfortable making his reads?

He didn't show that tendancy in his games prior to this season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The better question is...why can Matt Moore see the field better, and spread the ball around better in one game....and not the next?

Was the rams pass rush that much better that moore was as comfortable making his reads?

He didn't show that tendancy in his games prior to this season.

Because fans don't know what they are watching.

When he completes a pass to the left to his first read and after the defender leaves the other receiver the other receiver jumps up and down. Uninformed fan goes "Aw we coulda had a TD"

Also when he does read the field, established #1 receiver along with other receivers give up on routes and leave QB hanging out to dry. Now QB only tries to hit first read.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because fans don't know what they are watching.

When he completes a pass to the left to his first read and after the defender leaves the other receiver the other receiver jumps up and down. Uninformed fan goes "Aw we coulda had a TD"

Also when he does read the field, established #1 receiver along with other receivers give up on routes and leave QB hanging out to dry. Now QB only tries to hit first read.

I think that Moore doesn't know what he is seeing, or he just can't compute what is happening fast enough.

For example, the first play from scrimmage, the "flea-flicker".

Yes, the safety did not commit to the run. However, he had not committed to cover deep either, he was frozen. Lafell had his man beat and the safety was last man standing. The safety was still turned to the LOS and with a full head of steam Lafell would have burned by him easily. Moore should have realized this and gone deep to Lafell, but he can not visualize how a play is going to form he only sees what the play is at the moment.

Instead of seeing that the safety was going to have to turn and get to speed to catch Lafell who was already at full speed, Moore flips out and throws a falling down pass to Smith who was the crossing under route and an INT.

Horrible play. What should have at the least been an incompletion and a sign to the Rams that we were going to stretch the field instead turns into a disaster because of his incompetence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that Moore doesn't know what he is seeing, or he just can't compute what is happening fast enough.

For example, the first play from scrimmage, the "flea-flicker".

Yes, the safety did not commit to the run. However, he had not committed to cover deep either, he was frozen. Lafell had his man beat and the safety was last man standing. The safety was still turned to the LOS and with a full head of steam Lafell would have burned by him easily. Moore should have realized this and gone deep to Lafell, but he can not visualize how a play is going to form he only sees what the play is at the moment.

Instead of seeing that the safety was going to have to turn and get to speed to catch Lafell who was already at full speed, Moore flips out and throws a falling down pass to Smith who was the crossing under route and an INT.

Horrible play. What should have at the least been an incompletion and a sign to the Rams that we were going to stretch the field instead turns into a disaster because of his incompetence.

While you show his "incompetence" in one play I can show a play where he has been competent.

The redemption TD pass to Gettis against SF. It was 3rd down and 2 and Smitty is dragging underneath at about 5 yards and is fairly wide open. Gettis in no way has his man beat by that much but Moore "visualized" how the play would turn out and threw it to Gettis for the TD. If he isn't confident in the way that play turns out then he leaves himself and the team in a 4th and 2.

Tell me what other bad decisions he made in the STL game because honestly there weren't many. It's been said many times on here, and alluded to by Smith, and by Fox that the last pick was Smith's fault. The second pick was not a decision problem but rather his arm got hit as he threw.

I just want to see some of his "incompetence" on display.

Edit:

Please note a "Moore homer" did not turn this thread into a Matt Moore thread but rather someone else did. It was a perfectly good topic to discuss from LPF and it got ruined.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that Moore doesn't know what he is seeing, or he just can't compute what is happening fast enough.

For example, the first play from scrimmage, the "flea-flicker".

Yes, the safety did not commit to the run. However, he had not committed to cover deep either, he was frozen. Lafell had his man beat and the safety was last man standing. The safety was still turned to the LOS and with a full head of steam Lafell would have burned by him easily. Moore should have realized this and gone deep to Lafell, but he can not visualize how a play is going to form he only sees what the play is at the moment.

Instead of seeing that the safety was going to have to turn and get to speed to catch Lafell who was already at full speed, Moore flips out and throws a falling down pass to Smith who was the crossing under route and an INT.

Horrible play. What should have at the least been an incompletion and a sign to the Rams that we were going to stretch the field instead turns into a disaster because of his incompetence.

It is much simpler than that. Moore throws to the guys he can see have separation or are open rather than throwing to a spot where he knows the receiver is supposed to be because he has no confidence in the receiver being there. There is no chemistry at all. Guys aren't picking up hot reads, receivers are breaking off routes, even Smitty didn't even turn around on that ball to him for the interception.

Moore has been burned enough by receivers not being where they are supposed to be that he is gun shy to throw it unless he can see he is open. Problem is though, that by the time the ball gets there the safety or help over the top has arrived as well.

I wouldn't disagree that Moore sometimes doesn't see the field or locks on one guy, but I also think that the receivers have given him little help in building the chemistry needed for a quarterback to fire the ball before a receiver breaks knowing he is going to be there when the ball arrives.

It is hard to say at this point whose fault it is without knowing what was called in the huddle. But the end result is poor play and lack of a passing game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
×
×
  • Create New...