Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

European Travels


neverlosethefeeling

Recommended Posts

Basically, my semester in England on Dec. 10th and I come home Dec 20th.

I want to do as much travelling in that time period as I can, so I've put together this mock itinerary:

Dec 11th-12 in Amsterdam. Flight arrives in amsterdam at 8:30am so I'll really have 2 whole days there. Fly out of Amsterdam to Berlin on the morning of the 13th and stay til the 15th. Then flying from Berlin to Venice for pretty much a day and a half, then my final 3 days in Rome before returning to London on the 19th for my flight home on the 20th.

Do you think this is too ambitious?

I have been to London many times already, and am going to Paris next weekend, so those two cities don't need to be included.

I know there are people here with more experience in these cities than I've got so I'm wondering if there's one city I should spend more/less time in than I've allocated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

looks doable!

bring your nose plug to Paris

Especially on the Metro.

Paris is a wonderful city, though. So many things to do and see. I spent 2 weeks visiting there, and only took a day trip away out to Versailles--which is a great place to see, if you have the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

spent 12 days there in 2000 for the World Firefighter Games...was a great time, but couldn't get past the smell of urine everywhere! Had our opening cermeonies at Louis 14th's castle in Versaille which was amazing. Wish I had spent more time outside of Paris though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You may want to avoid France. We have offices there and the strikes have really slowed things down there as far as travel. At least check what's going on before you actually make the trip into France, might through off your plans if you get stuck there longer than planned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please get as high as possible in Amsterdam and send me pictures of what I am missing outon. k thanks.

i have a feeling there isnt much you are missing out on...lol.

Anyway, I cant put your time constraints perfectly together in my head, but..

You could skip Berlin, fly to Munich instead. Spend time in Munich then take the train to Salzburg, only an hour or two if that much. You can then take the train from Salzburg to Venice. its a much longer trip, but you could do it overnight. Ive done this itinerary is why i mention it.

Do see Venice though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You may want to avoid France. We have offices there and the strikes have really slowed things down there as far as travel. At least check what's going on before you actually make the trip into France, might through off your plans if you get stuck there longer than planned.

hhaha...the Frogs are always on strike. Now they are pissed because they are raising retirement from 60 to 62....poor frogs. fug if you add up all the vacation time they get, it would effectively put there retirement age at 45. :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Basically, my semester in England on Dec. 10th and I come home Dec 20th.

I want to do as much travelling in that time period as I can, so I've put together this mock itinerary:

Dec 11th-12 in Amsterdam. Flight arrives in amsterdam at 8:30am so I'll really have 2 whole days there.Fly out of Amsterdam to Berlin on the morning of the 13th and stay til the 15th. Then flying from Berlin to Venice for pretty much a day and a half, then my final 3 days in Rome before returning to London on the 19th for my flight home on the 20th.

Do you think this is too ambitious?

I have been to London many times already, and am going to Paris next weekend, so those two cities don't need to be included.

I know there are people here with more experience in these cities than I've got so I'm wondering if there's one city I should spend more/less time in than I've allocated.

Dude that trip is going to make you go through moolah like you won't believe. I take it you're already in London? You already know the ridiculous markup on, well, everything in London. Amsterdam is the same way.

As far as Rome, learn the bus system, as there are only 2 subway lines. Be careful where you eat in Italy. I hoped to get some authentic ravioli last time I was there. Instead I paid like 12 euro for a can of Chef Boyardee. I stayed at Jesolo Beach when I went to Venice - the hotel was like 1/5th the price of the ones in Venice.

The trip is very doable. Unless you get laid repeatedly in Rome, I think you'll regret that leg.

And London is much dirtier than Paris. I was surprised. Paris also smelled better. The worst smelling European city by far is Brussels. At the Eiffel Tower, you'll be mobbed by Bosnians refugees. Give as you wish, but just be cognizant that you'll be swarmed by them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The only thing I said was he was part of the staff that made part of the decisions, and that I am judging the decisions made by that group as a whole. As assistant GM, you can pretty much guarantee his input held more sway than an intern or the guy that takes coffee requests. Fitterer didn't operate in a vacuum. Neither does Morgan now. While Fitterer did have the ultimate decision, to say that Dan had no input in ranking boards, evaluating FAs, trade offers or anything else would be asinine. We all know he did. Otherwise what the hell was his job as assistant GM? He wouldn't have been kept for 3 years if he was arguing every decision Scott ever made.    And the actual quote was "Morgan has done a bang up job in the draft and FA. Compared to what the last guy did, he is kicking ass and taking names." So is XL kicking ass and Brooks taking names from last years draft or did I get it backwards? We took Wallace over Payton Wilson because he was an injury risk after trading up for a RB with a torn ACL? Which one of the kicking ass and taking names was that?  Maybe we should review the thousands of gameday posts calling for XL to get off the field because he's a bust and can't catch a cold. We could review the posts about Brooks but... And Wilson. He's at 118 tackles this season vs 36 for Wallace.  I gave credit to Dan for a good draft this year. But I'm also not ignoring last year's draft either since he did that one after the last guy too.  That's not a strawman. 
    • And then, in week 18, we can take Mayfield out of the game and whoop Bridgewater's @$$ for good measure! Let the former QB revenge train roll on!!
    • If we keep our guards in tact ($$$) and go with Mays at C, some OT depth would be nice. I think we should be happy about CB with Thornton's development (pre injury) and Smith Wade. I think Ransom is developing nicely, but I would like to see a FS type for situations. We suck at ILB and Edge (as a whole). We should be OK at RB.  I hope we sign Dowdle to a short contract. QB?  There are signs of hope and development.  (I don't like our backup QB) TE?  Good draft for TE, but I think we are developing with Evans, Sanders, and Tremble. WR?  A #2 with Coker and Horn in the slot.  XL?  What is that? We should be good in 2026. Morgan does more than draft.  Free agency has been strong too.  (Just emptying my brain on your comment--sorry)
×
×
  • Create New...