Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Schefter: "Cowher Definitely Will Not Be the Dallas Coach"


ZedLeppelin

Recommended Posts

What's this thread doing in the Panther forum? :willy_nilly::willy_nilly::willy_nilly:

we're talking about how he's set to come here!

I'm pointing out how he isn't though. I think he's just as likely to go elsewhere...

Oh, Minnesota... how could I forget.

I don't think CHI/CIN/Denver are going to drop their coaches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

he was named coach of the year last year, but you may be right.

I don't think Denver will, because I expect they'll give him one more year before cutting him off.

At one point I thought CLE would be looking too, but now...

right now I see us, Minnesota, Dallas (Garrett may get a real shot though), Jacksonville, San Diego, San Fran... and maybe one other from the list mentioned bove, so... 5-7 teams looking for new head coaches...

Of those teams, assuming Dallas is taken, I think San Diego would be the most coveted spot, then Minnesota, then it's a crapshoot amongst the rest of us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What's this thread doing in the Panther forum? :willy_nilly::willy_nilly::willy_nilly:

2 possible reasons:

1) joat hasn't moved it yet stating that since it doesn't have anything to do with someone not currently associated with the panthers, it doesn't belong here

or

2) it isn't about jim harbaugh who joat doesn't like and believes has no chance of being our next coach which means it's ok to stay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Dude... you're just all over the place. You're the one who said T-Mac is better right now than Chark was at his best.
    • When I say "average NFL WR", for me, that's comparing him to all WRs in the league during that season/span of time.  He was of course better than those #4-6 WR's that can't even get on the field, but talent/ability wise, he probably wasn't any better than a #3 WR for most NFL teams, he just happened to be on one of the teams in 2019 with even worse WR's so he put up solid stats for the season. Here's more or less how I'm looking at it. Take T-Mac right now and Chark at his best, put them on every NFL team at this very moment, and where would they fall on the depth chart come Week 1 (basically, the teams that don't put the rookies at #1 to "make them earn it in camp" don't count, it's projecting week 1 depth charts). T-Mac would be at worst the #2 WR on the majority of teams this season, (hell, he's likely our #1 at this very moment right now already), peak Chark would not.  Yes, T-Mac still has to prove himself at this level, but his current ability, even as a rookie who hasn't played a snap yet, would have him above Chark on any team's week 1 depth chart. Because again, you can't just fall back on "well Chark had a 1,000 yard season" and use that as the reason for having him above T-Mac.  As he didn't have that 1k yards because he was a beast, it was because he was the only halfway decent receiving option on a bad team that was always losing and passing the ball (the Jags had the 7th worst scoring differential that season).
    • We clearly need to add a veteran stopgap at safety one way or the other.
×
×
  • Create New...