Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Troy Smith, Vet QB for Next Season


Proudiddy

Recommended Posts

I've been a fan of Troy Smith since watching him at OSU... Many here have said they would've loved to bring him in as well while he was with the Ravens. He was supposedly the starter going into Joe Flacco's rookie year, but became sick, lost a lot of weight IIRC, and missed a lot of time early on... Opening up the door for Flacco, and the rest is history.

He's now tearing it up for the Niners and when many here realized he was named their starter after Charles Johnson injured Alex Smith, he was again discussed, as to 'why didn't we sign him?'

Well, I looked it up and as I suspected, he is playing on a 1-year deal... I've proposed that we sign McNabb as the transitional vet to play while we develop our QB of the future behind him (whether it be Clausen, Pike, or whoever we draft). But, Troy is still relatively young.

I think signing him as our vet could be IDEAL. Being that he is still young, he could not only serve as the 'steady hand'-ed mentor, but quite possibly could come in and own the starting job from day one and become our QB of the future, not only the present.

I think a signing like Troy Smith could be a much better deal than we got when we signed Jake years back, and could turn things around in a hurry. He'd probably be signed for a similarly cheap deal like Jake got, and he's obviously much more naturally talented.

If we sign him, I believe we could concentrate on another position than QB with the first pick and continue to build at other skill positions, confident we have a legitimate winner at the QB position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Call me bias, but Troy can play. He is pretty accurate and very mobile. Usually makes good decisions and is a good leader.

But Carolina hasn't really made a good decision in the past 2 years. Peppers gone, no veteran WR signed, we give up a 2nd rounder for a 3rd rounder, etc...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like Troy Smith and I wish him luck. if he plays well in SF, he's probably going to end up staying there.

Plus, he's not exactly a veteran presence. I don't think it would be a good idea to bring him in as a mentor. He's going to be looking for a starting job assuming he keeps playing like he has been. With that in mind, he would have to be a long term answer like you say, and I just don't think this team will go for a long term answer from FA, but through the draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm saying that if he continues to have the year he's having, he may opt to test the market before locking in with SF for the future, so I think we would realistically have a chance.

And as far as comparing him to Matt Moore. I don't think it's a fair comparison at all. While MM had more starts last year as a sample of work, we also saw him start a few years before that and most everyone felt he was "okay" but not spectacular or ready to be a starter. After last year, many of us felt he made enough progress to be a starter but there were still questions as to why he never earned the job over Jake before that.

I don't see these questions with Troy Smith. He was supposed to be the starter in B-More, but because of the illness, he never got a shot at it. Additionally, he's always looked relatively good in pre-season games, which MM didn't, AND I've heard reports that the Ravens players loved Smith as a player and leader... So, I think he can step in and be a leader.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's only one game.

If he plays well enough to look like a potential full time starter the 49ers will keep him.

If he doesn't then it doesn't make any sense to bring him in.

It's a bit of a no for either situation.

I'd rather fully commit to Clausen and bring in a mentor type. Or go all out and sign McNabb and just give Clausen the chance to compete.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i would rather have a vet QB with actual game time experience...not just a few games like moore or troy smith (assuming smith can get the start for a couple games).

i want a vet with years of playing experience in here. i don't necessarily want him as the starter, i'd rather have clausen (if he improves the rest of the season) or some rookie with the old vet on the sidelines giving pointers.

not at all on they troy smith bandwagon. never have been. i'm thinking calling him a vet is a bit of a stretch and i don't really want him to come here and play. i just don't see him making the team any better. it's just wishful thinking on several people's part.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Derrick Brown was one player I never called or even suggested was a bust . Dude was young and hadn't even hit his stride. It takes time to learn the position. The thing I appreciated about him is that he kept improving season after season. He got paid and keeps on going like the Energizer Bunny.
    • How many teams coddle their QB the way Bryce has been coddled? I have never seen any other team in the NFL EVER baby a QB the way that Bryce has been.  Bryce was named day 1 starter his first year. It was obvious he didnt deserve it. He wasnt ready as evidenced by the worst rookie year in NFL history.  So let's move to year 2. He's named starter again with no competition in TC and is benched 2 games later. We have the ghost of a backup in Dalton who is so bad he can only beat Vegas and let's remember, the only reason he lost his starting job was a car accident, not because Bryce actually beat him out in practice.  And year 3. We sign Dalton again, who already proved he couldn't be depended on to put an even remotely passable performance on the field, and bring back Jack Plummer, who was even worse than last year. It was obvious he was nothing more than a pretend body in an attempt to create an illusion of some type of attempt to find a backup.  Then we start again with garbage play again and Bryce gets benched with a phantom injury, and the ghost of the ghost of Dalton breaks his thumb on the first drive and craps the field all over again. If we had actually made an attempt to find a legitimate QB2, it's possible Bryce doesn't step on the field again. Bryce is not agood QB and if we had any other mediocre QB, our record would be the same or better.  Bryce is not entrenched. He's been placed, protected and sheltered from ever having to face a  real QB competition in TC. Richardson and Levis both were ass and both were benched and eventually replaced.  Do I expect Baker to face competition in camp? Sure. I expect Tampa to find the best QB2 they can at price that fits their cap and resources and system and get him up to speed. If he's better than Baker, and if he's better by a significant margin, that's best for the team. The ultimate goal is a Super Bowl. Bellichek was constantly getting QB2s with the GOAT as his starter. He knew the value and that was realized when Cassell led them to an 11-5 record as a backup.  You and I may think differently than the people that matter but I will say it again. If you're afraid to bring in a capable backup, especially after the debacle of last year. The starting role wasn't earned, it was given, and that's loser mentality.
    • I would have done the same thing.  LSU is a much better job than Ole Miss.  Plus the enormous contract and every advantage a college team can offer in terms of recruiting and facilities and tradition etc 
×
×
  • Create New...