Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

DONOVAN EZEIRUAKU at 8?


1989
 Share

Recommended Posts

Why is no one talking about this DE from BC?

16.5 sacks last year. Looks smart and fast on tape. Hits hard and throws tackles around. I’d be happy with him at 8. 
 

 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

I'd rather take this guy than some workout warrior who barely never 2 sacks in an entire season let alone a game.

We shouldn't be taking any of them near or in the top 10 (save for Abdul Carter who isn't going to drop).

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Please God hurry the draft up

Just remember, after the draft we have a couple of weeks to bicker about the picks we did and didn't make any then basically nothing for months. Well, hopefully nothing. Pretty much any football related news between May and July is gonna be bad news.

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, 1989 said:

What does that mean? This is a football forum where you discuss football lol

You are A)asking a completely moronic question and B)you were already discussing this in another thread

 

Simply googling his name and reading about him would give you a legit answer

  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

I am operating under the "blind squirrel/nut" philosophy this year.  Dan can't completely blow it again can he?

Well, we don't know. But we'll know all we need to know on the 24th, including whether he and Davie boy will be here in two years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Just remember, after the draft we have a couple of weeks to bicker about the picks we did and didn't make any then basically nothing for months. Well, hopefully nothing. Pretty much any football related news between May and July is gonna be bad news.

I think the consensus last year was it was a weak draft class for us sans Sanders in the 4rth.  Everything else was kindof like "wtf, why?"

 

We did have a few stragglers who feel in love with xls accent and people who were not concerned about brooks.  "Beast" is the term they used to descripe him.

 

I didnt think we could do worse then fitt in the draft but morgan said hold my beer

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

I am operating under the "blind squirrel/nut" philosophy this year.  Dan can't completely blow it again can he?

Ooof...don't jinx the man like that.  We already have black cat as our mascot.  Take it back.

Knock Knock Good Luck GIF by Achievement Hunter

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

You are A)asking a completely moronic question and B)you were already discussing this in another thread

 

Simply googling his name and reading about him would give you a legit answer

You’re always such a dick

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
  • The D 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...