Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Everette Brown, Hardy, Goodson...


SnarkAttack

Recommended Posts

FINALLY Everett Brown had an impact on this game. A few tackles, a sack and some pressures. That draft day trade still looks bad, but it looked far worse earlier in the season. Hardy played well - I think he will be an impact player in the near future. Finally, Goodson is obviously playing lights out - racking up 100 yd games with the dame o line and defensive scheming that stymied Stewart/DeAngelo. I'm predicting we won't go into next season with the same group of RB's. I saw sign Williams and trade Stewart if we can get a 2nd for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

our core of talent is going to be solid as hell next year. this awful year may turn out to have a few disguised blessings... lots of reps for future starters who otherwise wouldn't have gotten a chance to contribute.

all three of those players could be future pro-bowlers if they reach their potential.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hands to the face.

:cool:

pressure leads to incompletions, turnovers, and sacks. don't judge the quality of a DE by his sack statistics.

Yes, Brown had an impact. He forced Flacco out of the pocket and into quick throws more than once. He had a couple of nice plays against runs where he didn't let the T set the edge, forcing the RB back inside.

Good game all around, unless you're just looking for reasons to hate.

He had an average game to me. I guess that's great compared to the rest of the defense/team :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:cool:

He had an average game to me. I guess that's great compared to the rest of the defense/team :(

Perhaps you, like a lot of fans, have unrealistic expectations.

There's are a lot more factor to performance that the glory stats. Sacks are vastly overrated, not enough credit is given to the rest of the demands of the position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perhaps you, like a lot of fans, have unrealistic expectations.

I am sorry, what? Dude cost us a 1st AND 2nd round pick. Unrealistic Expectations? C'mon man. As far as I am concerned he should be right there with Charles Johnson on this defensive line. One sack, missed tackles...a bunch of spin moves that led to him being out of position. No thank you.

He isn't worth what this franchise wasted on him. He should've been picked in the 3rd round maybe the 4th.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You may be interested to know that the average depth of separation is dependent upon the type of route run. Though go-routes are the most type of route run, they also produce the least amount of separation (and, of course, completions).   "The average pass catcher runs a go route on nearly a quarter of all routes (22.3%), the highest percentage of any route type in our data. However, those routes are targeted roughly 1 out of 10 times (10.8 percent), the lowest target rate of any route. The WR screen is the least-run route (3.4%), and it's the only route where the average target is behind the line of scrimmage. But it's also targeted at the highest rate (40.7%) and early in the play (1.6 seconds average time to throw). The most targeted routes outside of the WR Screen? The out (27.8%) and slant (25.2%) routes are the next most popular across the league."     "The most valuable routes by expected points added per target were the post (+0.48) and corner (+0.43) routes. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. One possible reason for this: It's harder to separate on go routes, which put the player on a straight path, than on posts or corners, which ask the player to make a cut. Targeted pass catchers on posts and corners average 2.4 yards and 2.3 yards of separation from the nearest defender, respectively, while pass catchers targeted on go routes average just 1.8 yards of separation."   https://www.nfl.com/news/next-gen-stats-intro-to-new-route-recognition-model#:~:text=Targeted pass catchers on posts,) and slant (+0.26).   I would expect that Thielen would have an easier time catching the ball based that he runs the routes where it's easier to get open. Tet? Yet to be seen, but we may be better served getting him on some slants and crossers also.  In general, receivers are going to average a lower completion percentage and yards of separation on certain types of routes than others, that's why we shouldn't necessarily be taking stats, even advanced ones, at face value, as there are dynamics that most aren't even thinking about.  In terms of Tet, he's bigger and somewhat slower than a smaller dude, so you'd expect him not to have as much separation on go-routes, but his catch radius is massive and his hands are awesome. Hitting him in stride will probably be killer, but of course QBs are less accurate on go-routes according to the stats. Depending upon Tet's route versatility and how he is used, we could have a unicorn though. He's relatively fast, has great hands and gets YAC (and on an off note, if X can hold on to the ball, he's dangerous as well because he already has shown some separation ability).    
    • Most elite WRs aren't necessarily burners. Not a lot of elite WRs in the modern era were 4.3 guys. If anything, sometimes it seems like the super fast guys use their speed as a crutch and it hampers their development in the intricacies of route running.
×
×
  • Create New...