Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ww3?


Ja  Rhule

Recommended Posts

It's a U.S. op so we could get our carriers into Chinese waters as the next step in the dick-measuring contest (aka: Cold war) we've been involved in with China since the 90's.

It wouldn't be WW3. There are two likely scenerios in which WW3 could happen in the next 30 years. One is the formation of a middle eastern coalition. The other is a war with China. One other scenario would be an the discovery of massive oil/mineral reserves in Antarctica leading to a landgrab scenerio.

I don't think WW3 with China is likely, since both countries are so economically dependent on each other. An economic war and a series of proxy wars are much more likely.

So if the U.S. does pursue military action against NK, mark it down in the history books as the first of those proxy wars.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a U.S. op so we could get our carriers into Chinese waters as the next step in the dick-measuring contest (aka: Cold war) we've been involved in with China since the 90's.

It wouldn't be WW3. There are two likely scenarios in which WW3 could happen in the next 30 years. One is the formation of a middle eastern coalition. The other is a war with China. One other scenario would be an the discovery of massive oil/mineral reserves in Antarctica leading to a land grab scenario.

I don't think WW3 with China is likely, since both countries are so economically dependent on each other. An economic war and a series of proxy wars are much more likely.

So if the U.S. does pursue military action against NK, mark it down in the history books as the first of those proxy wars.

Old Henry Ford had it right over 75 years ago. He said, "Peace through trade."

You have to wonder 3 things:

1) What would have happened if the US hadn't cut off oil and scrap metal to Japan prior to WWII? Would Japan still have entered the war on the side of the Nazi's or stay neutral?

2) If Truman hadn't order the atomic bombs to be dropped when he did, Russia was posturing to come into the War with Japan. Presumably to possibly grab the island for itself. (A portion of which they took over and never gave back.) Would the US and Russia have joined forces?

3) What if the Yankees would have signed Fidel Castro to a baseball contract back in the 50's? Would Cuba have been out 51st state?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No one way to do it, it does appear that with the bigger draft picks of the last 5 years…..majority haven’t steered clear of young QBs on the roster being their hopeful guy. Especially past their rookie seasons but even some the biggest ones have had it early.   As far as Andy Dalton, the two young guys he has “mentored”…..have had very rough NFL starts.  Which really ask the why the heck is Dalton here.   He doesn’t really check any box.  No young potential.  Can’t step in and win.  And his mentor track record with Fields and now Bryce is bad 
    • I had thought the Panthers might let him play out his contract this year and hope he stays healthy. If not draft a left tackle and move Ekwonu to right tackle. 
    • Frankly, if most teams in the NFL lose their starting QB for a significant amount of time, they're screwed. The fantasy is that one has a future Tony Romo or a Nick Foles that can carry a stacked team. The reality is that you might get roughly 3~5 games out of your backup before it all falls apart. Remember all of Peyton Manning's backups? Utterly terrible. Speaking of backup QB's, Raiders may need one. https://www.nfl.com/news/raiders-qb-aidan-o-connell-suffered-fractured-wrist-in-preseason-finale-expected-to-be-out-6-8-weeks
×
×
  • Create New...