Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If Luck does not declare...


Ricky Spanish

Recommended Posts

I would be all for trading down if we could. Pick up some more picks, but that just depends on someone falling in love with a top prospect and with a rookie cap I don't think teams will mind picking a corner or defensive tackle number one overall.

By the way, did anyone watch the Stanford game last night? I only got to watch the first half but that was more than enough to fully understand the hype for this kid. He made a throw to the outside that im not sure many starting QB's in the NFL right now could make. If nothing else he is a much better prospect, in every sense of the word, than mark Sanchez, Sam Bradford, or Matthew stafford...and those guys have been pretty successful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would be all for trading down if we could. Pick up some more picks, but that just depends on someone falling in love with a top prospect and with a rookie cap I don't think teams will mind picking a corner or defensive tackle number one overall.

By the way, did anyone watch the Stanford game last night? I only got to watch the first half but that was more than enough to fully understand the hype for this kid. He made a throw to the outside that im not sure many starting QB's in the NFL right now could make. If nothing else he is a much better prospect, in every sense of the word, than mark Sanchez, Sam Bradford, or Matthew stafford...and those guys have been pretty successful.

Trading down will not be a possibility if Luck is not there. Let's face it, we are stuck with the #1 pick no matter what. Green/Peterson would be our pick at that point. I highly doubt we take Mallett that high.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

fug no. The only way we take a QB is if Luck is on the board. Jake Locker is a fuging bum. I think we'd take the BPA which would either be Green or Peterson.

I agree with you, but when was the last time a draft came around and the top QB in the class (which would probably be Locker) wasn't at least being considered for the top pick?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trading down will not be a possibility if Luck is not there. Let's face it, we are stuck with the #1 pick no matter what. Green/Peterson would be our pick at that point. I highly doubt we take Mallett that high.

Mallett is considered a top 10 draft pick. It'd be a tough choice but if Mallett blows you away at the combine and the interviews then you have to take him. He has had a really really good season for Arkansas this year and has all the tools to be really good in the NFL.

That said the only two things that I see keeping Luck at Stanford are:

1 - Lockout

2 - Harbaugh not taking an NFL job

I think Harbaugh is as good as gone and if there is a lockout then we get the #1 pick two years in a row. Take AJ Green this year and take Luck the next year. Couldn't get much better than that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Harbaugh is as good as gone and if there is a lockout then we get the #1 pick two years in a row. Take AJ Green this year and take Luck the next year. Couldn't get much better than that.

If only we could be so lucky. I am sure the NFL would figure out a lottery system for the draft picks in 2012 should a lockout kill the regular season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If only we could be so lucky. I am sure the NFL would figure out a lottery system for the draft picks in 2012 should a lockout kill the regular season.

I read somewhere that if there is a lockout then they will do it by record and it will snake which means we'd have the #1 overall pick and then 64th pick as our second rounder.

If Luck comes out though there is no chance the new coaching staff passes on him. Even if it isn't Jim Harbaugh, Andrew Luck will be our QB if he comes out and here are the reasons.

1. BPA and it just happens to be at the most important position in football. Oh yeah...its also the weakest link on our team. If that isn't enough here are a few more

2. The Panthers have had the worst QB situation in the league for the last 3 years. It is time to get a legitimate franchise QB in here to make us contenders year in and year out. In the past 8 years alone here are the teams that have BANKED on first round QBs

Jets - Sanchez

Falcons - Ryan

Ravens - Flacco

Broncos/Bears - Cutler

Packers - Rodgers

Giants - Manning

Chargers - Rivers

Steelers - Roethlisberger

What is the common factor amongst all of those QBs?? Every one of those teams will probably make the playoffs.

3. There are 3 positions in the NFL that you take with a #1 pick and they are QB, OT, DE. We are set at LT with Gross for at least another 3-4 years and there isn't a DE worthy of the #1 pick.

4. QB prospects that have failed are either immature, weak-armed, or both. Andrew Luck is neither of those things.

5. Jimmy Clausen is not ready and IMO doesn't have the leadership ability to get a bunch of veteran guys to buy into him. Trade him and start over with a better prospect. A lot of teams make picks like us and then don't get a chance to fix it just one year later. Not to mention he is making a 2nd round salary that wouldn't be hard to trade at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I read somewhere that if there is a lockout then they will do it by record and it will snake which means we'd have the #1 overall pick and then 64th pick as our second rounder.

If Luck comes out though there is no chance the new coaching staff passes on him. Even if it isn't Jim Harbaugh, Andrew Luck will be our QB if he comes out and here are the reasons.

1. BPA and it just happens to be at the most important position in football. Oh yeah...its also the weakest link on our team. If that isn't enough here are a few more

2. The Panthers have had the worst QB situation in the league for the last 3 years. It is time to get a legitimate franchise QB in here to make us contenders year in and year out. In the past 8 years alone here are the teams that have BANKED on first round QBs

Jets - Sanchez

Falcons - Ryan

Ravens - Flacco

Broncos/Bears - Cutler

Packers - Rodgers

Giants - Manning

Chargers - Rivers

Steelers - Roethlisberger

What is the common factor amongst all of those QBs?? Every one of those teams will probably make the playoffs.

3. There are 3 positions in the NFL that you take with a #1 pick and they are QB, OT, DE. We are set at LT with Gross for at least another 3-4 years and there isn't a DE worthy of the #1 pick.

4. QB prospects that have failed are either immature, weak-armed, or both. Andrew Luck is neither of those things.

5. Jimmy Clausen is not ready and IMO doesn't have the leadership ability to get a bunch of veteran guys to buy into him. Trade him and start over with a better prospect. A lot of teams make picks like us and then don't get a chance to fix it just one year later. Not to mention he is making a 2nd round salary that wouldn't be hard to trade at all.

New head coach will want his own guy. Period.

I also agree with everything you said. Clausen isn't showing us anything super promising. The progress is minimal. With the other first round QB's you listed, those teams saw the potential, capability, and progress that Clausen is not showing. I wanted Clausen to work out, but he simply is not going to be a franchise Qb. Take Luck, and we are set for the next 15 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...