Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Guys, do you agree with this?


Matt Foley

Recommended Posts

Since i'll probably never meet any women on the huddle I feel safe saying this.

If I see her from the front the first thing I analyze are the tits, then the face, then the ass.

If I see her from the back first, the first thing I notice is her ass,then i come around to see the tits and face.

and if their overweight and don't carry it well then i dont notice anything unless i'm drunk and lonely..at this point i will analyze the lips

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i look at her left ring finger....
Honestly, only if I'm past vaguely interested. Usually it goes: Eyes, boobs, cheekbones, rear, smile, hands (ring glance here, once I've seen if they have man-hands or not), that spot on her neck right above the collarbone (whatever the hell that's called...), legs, eyes again.

Not a fan of red lipstick unless it's worn at night and done in a classy way. Some women can get away with it, but quite a few others can't. It depends on how much else is worn with it, but for me, the less makeup on a woman, the better. Personally, I think all of it is garbage for the most part, but every now and then, I like my woman to get "dressy" like I'd wear a nice suit to a function.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly, only if I'm past vaguely interested. Usually it goes: Eyes, boobs, cheekbones, rear, smile, hands (ring glance here, once I've seen if they have man-hands or not), that spot on her neck right above the collarbone (whatever the hell that's called...), legs, eyes again.

Not a fan of red lipstick unless it's worn at night and done in a classy way. Some women can get away with it, but quite a few others can't. It depends on how much else is worn with it, but for me, the less makeup on a woman, the better. Personally, I think all of it is garbage for the most part, but every now and then, I like my woman to get "dressy" like I'd wear a nice suit to a function.

i look at her ring finger to see if the rock is nice....if so, ill attempt to steal it.....

why? what do you look at the ring finger for? :confused:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You're assuming just as well.   Morgan and Canales were hired 3 days apart.  I believe it was partially due to their connections in Seattle.  i believe Tepper wanted some familiarity with his GM and HC.  It is so easy to sit back and arm-chair QB over draft picks.  You don't know what the philosophy was going into the 2024 draft.  I believe Canales and Morgan were drafting for the future.  XL and Brooks point to that philosophy. Name me one GM that is 100% on draft picks.  Just one.  You're not going to find one.    I think year one picks weren't for what can you do for me now but Potential.   XL hasn't lived up to the hype of a 1st rounder.  I think we all can agree on that. However, there still is hope he comes around.  What I believe they saw in him was his speed after the catch.  He needs to get more consistent but when he gets the ball you kind of hold your breath just a second because if he gets free, he's gone.  The Brooks pick was a signing for the future, and no one could have guessed he would re-injure the same ACL.  This makes the pick look bad but Dallas was ready to draft him later that same round.  IMO we'll have to see what happens next season before we can call this a bust. Wallace has improved each season and for a third rounder has done well.  Sanders has shown flashes and considering the pick in the 4th round it wasn't a bad pick.  His sophomore season IMO was a little bit more productive.  Smith-Wade has been a good addition and has played well.  For a 5th round pick to get as much playing time as he has.  Most picks below round 3 should take a couple of years to get up to speed.  He's been a decent player.  Crumedy, no comment We turned Barrett into Jackson.  This was an amazing move and basically got a starting CB for a 7th round pick.  Pretty shrewd if you ask me. Coker, maybe the best Free Agent signing of the 2024 draft class. So, in short, you can't say that the draft was a bust.  It isn't a home run but all but one are still on the team and outside of Brooks have made contributions to wins.  2025 draft class has been much better with almost every pick making contributions this season.  Now take Fitterer's two years and compare them to Morgan and tell me that they have the same philosophy. 
    • He hasn’t led crap, he’s on loaded teams and a piece of the puzzle. And he’s he has improved drastically but it took the ultimate QB whispers in Shanahan and KOC. You put him on this Panther team and he’s back to normal Darnold 
    • Slavin and Jarvis week to week. Florida cheap shots took out our two best players.  I’d start KK so he can beat the brakes off someone.  
×
×
  • Create New...