Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Guys, do you agree with this?


Matt Foley

Recommended Posts

Since i'll probably never meet any women on the huddle I feel safe saying this.

If I see her from the front the first thing I analyze are the tits, then the face, then the ass.

If I see her from the back first, the first thing I notice is her ass,then i come around to see the tits and face.

and if their overweight and don't carry it well then i dont notice anything unless i'm drunk and lonely..at this point i will analyze the lips

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i look at her left ring finger....
Honestly, only if I'm past vaguely interested. Usually it goes: Eyes, boobs, cheekbones, rear, smile, hands (ring glance here, once I've seen if they have man-hands or not), that spot on her neck right above the collarbone (whatever the hell that's called...), legs, eyes again.

Not a fan of red lipstick unless it's worn at night and done in a classy way. Some women can get away with it, but quite a few others can't. It depends on how much else is worn with it, but for me, the less makeup on a woman, the better. Personally, I think all of it is garbage for the most part, but every now and then, I like my woman to get "dressy" like I'd wear a nice suit to a function.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly, only if I'm past vaguely interested. Usually it goes: Eyes, boobs, cheekbones, rear, smile, hands (ring glance here, once I've seen if they have man-hands or not), that spot on her neck right above the collarbone (whatever the hell that's called...), legs, eyes again.

Not a fan of red lipstick unless it's worn at night and done in a classy way. Some women can get away with it, but quite a few others can't. It depends on how much else is worn with it, but for me, the less makeup on a woman, the better. Personally, I think all of it is garbage for the most part, but every now and then, I like my woman to get "dressy" like I'd wear a nice suit to a function.

i look at her ring finger to see if the rock is nice....if so, ill attempt to steal it.....

why? what do you look at the ring finger for? :confused:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Saw this show up in my new feed. Nice to see a couple of our rookies making it into the top 5 so far, even if it is a pff measure... From https://www.pff.com/news/nfl-top-15-rookies-week-9-2025 ... 4. TE Mitchell Evans, Carolina Panthers (78.7) Evans struggled in the Panthers’ tight win over the Packers, finishing with a 41.8 PFF overall grade — third worst among tight ends this week. He was not targeted in the game and played only one snap in pass protection. He did log 15 run-blocking snaps, and although he earned a 68.9 PFF run-blocking grade in zone looks (seven snaps), his 39.0 mark in gap schemes (second worst for the week) dragged him down to a 46.6 PFF run-blocking grade overall — sixth worst for the week. Despite seeing zero targets over his past two games, Evans still leads the Carolina tight end group with a 74.3 PFF receiving grade. He has caught all nine of his targets for 90 yards, six first downs and two touchdowns. Evans also leads the Panthers’ tight end group in PFF run-blocking grade (72.2). He has recorded a 20.5% positive play rate across 175 snaps.  5. WR Tetairoa McMillan, Carolina Panthers (78.6) McMillan had a better day against the Packers, recording four catches for 46 yards. Most of that production came in the first quarter via two 16-yard catches — one of which he snatched from Carrington Valentine’s hands, who was in perfect position to break up the pass. McMillan accounted for three first downs on the day, although Green Bay was able to limit his impact after the catch, holding him to 0.8 yards after the catch per reception. McMillan now has 41 catches for 558 yards — a top-15 mark. He is also tied for second with 19 explosive gains of 15-plus yards. Three of McMillan’s catches against the Packers came between the numbers, bringing him to 22 for 318 yards and 19 first downs (tied for second most) this season. He owns a 26.1% threat rate and a 76.6 PFF receiving grade between the numbers. He also ranks in the top 10 in explosive gains (10) and yards after the catch per reception (5.5) within that area of the field. 
    • At least we don't need to hear overreacting about towels ...
    • Actually there is, try being a Charlotte Hornets fan. I mean the team fuging moved at its peak and hasn't recovered since and that was 25 years ago
×
×
  • Create New...