Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Game 19: New Jersey Nets (6-13) @ Bobcats (6-12)


C-A-T-S

Recommended Posts

Where's Devin Harris, isn't he the starting PG?

Also I'm sure Humphries didn't start last time either. I heard recently the guard from Louisville was sent to the Dleague because of personal conduct. Can't remember his name but the one the Bobcats wanted instead of Henderson.

Edit: Terrence Williams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Amazingly, we lose a lead AGAIN and now going to OT. Coaching once again fails for us. I swear.

We really can't throw a pass in correctly in 2 tries? Give me a break. This team will not a keep a lead, I don't even care if the lead is 20. Once 4 minutes hits the clock in the 4th we'll give up enough points to put the other team in the game, EVERY time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So does Wallace need to write a letter apologizing to the fans for effing up at the end. Make your FTs!

Seriously. At least ONE of the FT's. You're our star, you're Mr. Bobcat, you have to at least make one of those.

His shot this year has been ugly. It's like a line-drive shot, no arc period.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

TT gettin it done.

I was about to throw my drink through the TV if that indeed ended up a foul lol.

I love TT's blocks, so much energy, he's getting better and better. His jumper is getting better too but sometimes he needs to drive instead of shoot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Ideally Bryce and the other starters should get at least a full quarter and an argument could be made for 2 full quarters given how they've played early in the season the last few years.
    • A rookie that has never played a snap and a proven 1000K NFL WR are not going to be viewed the same in these type rankings.  And calling draft picks, lotto picks, isn't some new quip I just invented.  take the big 3 Hubbard, AT, insert whatever 3rd Panther you want vs Kamara, Hill, Olave.  Most football folks outside of Carolina are picking the Saints there IMO.    
    • You didn’t really address the point, just like you ignored the point about the RBs initially, and saying “they are all lotto picks” is just a really silly reduction because you could say that about literally any player rookie or vet every snap, every game, every year. It is well known that different positions have different hit rates, and I would argue different types of prospects within position groups as well, and that hit rates change the further down in the draft you go. Everybody knows QB is different and that, for example, first round OL have a really high success rate. Using your lotto ticket analogy…again…you are saying a lotto ticket with a 1 in 100 chance of hitting is the exact same thing as a lotto ticket with a 1 in 2 chance of hitting (this is an example, don’t take these odds literally). The point was he is no more of a lotto ticket than the 31yr old receiver coming off a major knee injury, and in my opinion he is better odds with a higher potential “jackpot”. Saying one player is an “lotto ticket” while another isn’t is just not sound logic. You have no idea who will break out, regress, get injured, etc. There are safer bets than others, that’s all. I don’t think Diggs is a safe bet and even if he was, weighing him over all of the Panthers WRs plus 2 1k rushers is just dumb. You can disagree if you want. The list is stupid.
×
×
  • Create New...