Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Andrew Luck News & Updates


Jbro

Recommended Posts

You skipped the important part:

It is quite a difference from the 1-15 team, which lost 15 consecutive games, that Hurney inherited after the 2001 season.

Again, he got the benefit of having a first round draft pick from the 1-15 season. He was hired to build a championship team.

He failed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you don't want to read about Andrew Luck, you may want to stay out of this forum for a while.

If he doesn't declare, come back after about January 20th (it'll take a few days for the forum to calm down).

If he does, and we don't draft him, you'll probably want to wait till June (same reason).

If he declares, and we draft him, and you don't want to hear people talk about him, then I'd say don't come back at all.

wisdom

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You skipped the important part:

Again, he got the benefit of having a first round draft pick from the 1-15 season. He was hired to build a championship team.

He failed.

Didn't they go to the Superbowl in 2003 (in his second year as GM)?? was he supposed to coach the team as well?? or should have have played? How exactly did HE fail?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't agree with any of that.

Discrediting Hurney be saying he is lucky is illogical. He's done very well in the 1st and 3rd rounds, horrible in the 2nd. And 2005 was a disaster. Otherwise he's pretty good.

I don't know how many teams have consistently hit on their 1st rounders like we have.

Otherwise he's drafted very well, you can call it luck if you want but that makes no sense at all. It's totally baseless. That's like an excuse you give when you lose a pool game.

Also we've had 2 10+ loss seasons in 10 years which isn't all that bad. We're not nearly close to floundering like Detroit or the Raiders.

I would add that he has drafted well in the fifth thru seventh rounds.

He drafts good players, but not necessarily for needs. He has never drafted a good QB, DT, or WR. Those are huge holes in his arsonal.

Nobody here ever said one player can fix everything. Luck will help turn the worst offense I have ever seen into a good one with a good RG and some healing. A couple DTs and a CB will make the Defense top 10.

Name a great team in the NFL right now, and they have a QB better than any we have ever had. It is time we got a franchise QB. Luck is the best to come out in years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think this team has plenty of the pieces in place already, especially if we can get Otah and Wharton back healthy. I thought LaFell and Gettis showed a lot of promise as rookies and should be much better next year.

Ironically, it's the defense that really needs rebuilding, but one stud DT would go a long ways towards accomplishing that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is the only year you know that Jerry hasn't spent money. So where is your statment coming from? He paid JP 100 million last year and Jake 12 million who is on another team. So either you find it hard because you haven't been a fan past the last 2 years or you don't know what the hell your talking about.

The year is not over... yet. The main reason he hasn't spent is due to the CBA, so he goes out and contradicts himself by laying a load of cash on a 1st pick. The owners want a rookie cap, JR could make a statement to everyone by trading out of the top spot. JP made a $100 million last season?:confused:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just because all draft picks are a gamble doesn't mean you don't have a better chance at hitting on a better player the higher you're drafting. It would literally be like someone saying, I'll give you 1 or 2 free spins on a slot machine, and you say you'll take the 1 because you're not likely to win anything anyways with 1 or 2, so why bother? The Cowboys desperately wanted T-Mac, but because they were 4 picks behind us, they weren't able to get him.  If you told Cowboys fans that had they lost 2 more games last year in a lost season, that it would get them the player they wanted so badly, would they in retrospect go back and lose those games to get their guy? 95% of them would take that trade off in a heartbeat, and the others who wouldn't are the fans who would rather enjoy an extra win or two in a poo season to then set themselves up to be better for the next decade. I also think the fans who argue against this thinking, get too caught up in the "well that means you're going to be rooting against us late in the season even if we still have a shot at the playoffs." Which isn't true, it's saying if you're telling me right now we'd make the playoffs but lose in the first round, that I'd rather end up 8-9 or 9-8 and just miss the playoffs because in our opinion, the benefits that come along with that outweigh the benefit of the players getting 1 game of playoff experience.
    • In relation to tanking. I think you can count on one hand the number of people here who actually want us to lose football games. When accounting for it across the fanbase it amounts to maybe 2% of the entire Panthers fanbase. But you engage with some internet trolls and think haters are coming out of the woodwork and hey look at that it's all a conspiracy that leads to Bryce Young haters. Do you hear yourself sir? If it sounds ridiculous that's because it is. I mean at this point do you see Bryce haters in your dreams? As far as the culture of this franchise goes we seem to be doing better in that department via what we are building right now and with the people we have in place. But we also shouldn't just make assumptions just yet either. The rubber still needs to meet the road. And going back to previous seasons I think we can acknowledge although tanking obviously isn't a thing there were some times where we thought our culture was improving but really it wasn't. Yes I'm looking directly at some of those wins under Wilks. If the culture had truly changed we would not have lost to the Steelers who have been mediocre for years at home the way we did and they were starting Mitch Trubisky ffs. We did not change our culture for the better and we won games that ultimately meant nothing. It was just a brief mirage. We've done this for years now. The harsh truth of the matter is the Panthers have not had a winning season or been to the playoffs in going on 8 years but in those years they've been trying to convince themselves they aren't poo but in the process all they've done throughout most of that time period is squander better draft position and we were still the worst team in the league for our troubles. At the end of the day we should be able to just be adults and reconcile with that. And no that isn't being "pro tank" or any other boogeyman term it's simply recognizing reality.
    • He's an asset in a game manager role. But as soon as you have to ask him to go out there and try to make plays and not just take what the defense is giving him... well, Darnolding happens.
×
×
  • Create New...