Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Offseason upgrades.


pantherj

Recommended Posts

I'd say it's extremely likely that we'll continue to be a power running, zone defense team under the new coaching staff. Changing to a pass oriented offense wouldn't make any sense with the play action pass QBs we have on the roster. Even if we draft Luck, it would be unwise to ask him to carry the offense. Not to mention Hurney's recent comment on 'Panther Talk' about remaining a physical team focused on the run. And a switch to a 3-4 would be extemely difficult with our current roster. To play a 3-4, we would need an elite mountain of a NT to achor the line. That type of NT, like Ted Washington, is expensive and hard to aquire. So I'll assume we're sticking with our current offensive and defensive philosophies.

On offense, Luck will be our new QB, assuming we have a chance to draft him.

Our attention then needs to turn to the offensive line. Any mammoth starting offensive lineman on the roster needs to have a good quality backup in case of injury. O-lineman like Otah and Robinson are more likely to have leg/foot/back injuries due to their massive size. That means you need to spend more money/draft currency on backups than other teams with average sized linemen. Our current backups who have been thrust into the starting lineup are well below what we need to be compititive. They make me sick actually, and Stewart can't stand them.

All other offensive upgrades are secondary to Luck, and above average backups for Otah and Robinson.

On defense, we have Safeties who make a lot of mistakes, and zone CBs who will look as good as our pass rush will make them look. We're set at LB. The primary problem is that we don't have a good pass rusher at every position on the defensive line. The pass rush coming from the DE positions have been good for most of the season. DE Charles Johnson has actually managed to bull rush OTs who were trying to give him the speed rush and stop the bull rush. That takes a lot of power. DE Everet Brown has shown some improvement because he's stronger than he was last year, but he's still not capable of a good bull rush. That's ok, but what's not ok is that our DTs aren't generating any kind of pass rush. Opposing QBs can simply stepup into the pocket and avoid our DEs. We need two very good pass rushing DTs added to our team. With a good pass rush, our Tampa-2 defense can go on the attack. The goal is to force the opposing QB to throw mostly short passes throughout the game. This allows our seondary to absolutely blast recievers after the catch. This will certainly generate turnovers, and cause the opposing recievers to quit on routes, or face injury. There's no other way to play Tampa-2 and expect to win. The pass rush from the front-4 forces short passes, and the secondary inflicts violence on the recievers. If you don't see that happening, then you're watching the Carolina Panthers.

Any other defensive upgrade is secondary to aquiring two proven pass rushing DTs.

If we spend our first pick on Luck, then what position do we address with our 3rd and 4th picks? I would be inclinded to draft two strong run blocking offensive linemen as backups for Otah and Robinson. Then go into FA and buy two proven pass rushing DTs. If Luck is gone, then trade down, or pick the BPA. If it happens to be a DT, then you only need to buy one FA DT, and you can go out and try and buy a FA QB like Vick.

We're not doomed unless Jerry is planning to go cheap on us again. If we don't enter FA and spend a lot of $$$$$$, then we're stuck with what we have plus the draft. Not good enough, especially with no second round pick. Adding a few talented but unproven rookies to this team won't cut it. Sure we'll improve some, but we're currently the laughing stock of the NFL. It's up to you Jerry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that's a pretty good take on the situation. I think lack of depth on the offensive and defensive lines hurt us a great deal this season. Are there any defensive tackles you had in mind for us to target? It's so hard to draft a defensive tackle that will contribute right away. Therefore, I think we will have to go and get two in free agency to shore up the position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i think you hit it right on the head, as far as a DT goes, I like the idea of a 3-4 and maybe we go after richard seymour or maybe shaun ellis, though I highly doubt JR would bring either of them in, OL depth deffinitly was a huge issue this year Im certain that will be a focus of the draft and the offseason as a whole, Id also like to see a vet qb on the roster next year, maybe chad pennington or matt hasselbeck or even billy volek just someone to mentor the young guys, and there are a ton of FA WRs next year we can pick from the lot

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we go 3-4, many changes will have to made. Many new faces. However, since cutting a bunch of defensive players last season and not replacing them, there is a suggestion that we are going 3-4 --or want that option open. We signed a bunch of 1-year contracts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that's a pretty good take on the situation. I think lack of depth on the offensive and defensive lines hurt us a great deal this season. Are there any defensive tackles you had in mind for us to target? It's so hard to draft a defensive tackle that will contribute right away. Therefore, I think we will have to go and get two in free agency to shore up the position.

Well DaCityKats gave me this list of FA DTs: Spears, Ngata, Jenkins, Bowen, Cesire, Jolly, Mebane, and Cofield. I'm interested in Haloti Ngata of the Ravens, and I hope were in the mix to try and get him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Let's say we have a LT for 2026, because we do.  After that, let's say we Ickey could be back and we would have the option of extending Walker.   Don't get me wrong--I LOVE drafting OL.  Teams obviously get desperate for OTs and if they enter the draft without 2 solid tackles, they are almost obligated to reach for a first round OT.  This year, I see 1 OT who is probably worth first-round consideration, and I am not putting him in the top 10 players in the draft.  Lomu, Freeling, Miller, and Proctor, for example, probably and arguably have second-round value.  So why would you reach for an OT in round 1 when you already have starters at both T positions but you have other needs? We do need depth, however, and I think there is decent OT depth that needs development on day 3. They are no slouches, by the way.   Drew Shelton (could drop to round 4): Surrendered 1 sack as Penn State's LT in 2025. 33 3/8" arms.  Pass pro improved every year (4 years--experienced).  "For a team running a zone-heavy scheme that values lateral movement and reach-blocking ability over phone-booth mauling, Shelton has real appeal. He is not a plug-and-play starter, but the athletic tools and the clear year-over-year improvement suggest a player who can develop into a capable starter if a coaching staff invests in his strength base and cleans up his technique. The ceiling depends entirely on how much stronger he can get and whether his feet can stay alive after initial contact."   Austin Barber  (could drop to round 4): I see him as a RT at best and a probable kick inside to Guard where his strengths would switch from secondary to primary tools.  Considering Lewis and Hunt may be gone in a year or two, this would give the Panthers a chance to work him at RT and then move him inside if he is not effective, and there is confidence that G may be his best position. Jude Bowery (4th round projection) was LT on a Boston College OL that was effective in the run game.  Bowery is one of the most athletic OTs in the draft.  His arms are not ideal but not too short (33.75") to play LT.  He surrendered 2 sacks. He is raw, and needs some technical refinement with his hands.  I think he has the best upside and value for this offense.   Dametrious Crownover  TexAM (5th round projection; 35 3/8" arms) is one of the more fascinating developmental tackles in this class because the physical tools are legitimately rare. A strong run blocker who should be better in pass protection with his tools.  "You do not find many 6-7, 336-pound men with that foot speed and who have the athletic background of a converted tight end. When everything clicks, he looks like a starting right tackle in a gap-heavy run scheme, smothering defenders at the point of attack and using his length to erase speed off the edge. The 2024 tape, when he anchored one of the best rushing attacks in the SEC, is the version of Crownover that gets offensive line coaches excited."  THIS is the kind of player our coaches could develop until Moton is done. What made World intriguing coming out of Eugene was the untapped ceiling, a fifth-year transfer who arrived as the top-ranked offensive tackle in the portal and looked the part for stretches. The improvement he showed against Big Ten competition in his one Oregon season was real, and the physical foundation, length, athleticism, and improving technique in pass protection, is still there. The ACL tear suffered in the College Football Playoff semifinal against Indiana doesn't erase that, but it changes the conversation significantly. The injury clouds the immediate projection. Most ACL recoveries for offensive linemen run nine to twelve months, which means World is likely unavailable for meaningful action well into his rookie season at the earliest. The combine absence removes his chance to reset the narrative physically, and teams will be making decisions almost entirely off pre-injury film and medical evaluations. The contrast between his polished pass sets and his inconsistent run blocking was already a developmental concern, and now those technique issues get deferred further while he rehabs. Isaiah World  (Oregon, injured ACL in playoffs, 5th round projection--could slide to 6th).  World will not play much if at all in 2026, which is why he might fall.  For the Panthers' purposes, however, this would give the OL coaches time to work with him. "What made World intriguing coming out of Eugene was the untapped ceiling, a fifth-year transfer who arrived as the top-ranked offensive tackle in the portal and looked the part for stretches. The improvement he showed against Big Ten competition in his one Oregon season was real, and the physical foundation, length, athleticism, and improving technique in pass protection, is still there. The ACL tear suffered in the College Football Playoff semifinal against Indiana doesn't erase that, but it changes the conversation significantly." "That said, the investment argument isn't crazy for the right organization. This is still a tackle with first-round portal grades and the kind of athletic profile that doesn't just disappear. A team with patience and a strong offensive line room can afford to stash World on the roster, let him develop his lower-body power and pad-level consistency during the recovery process, and potentially unlock a starting-caliber right tackle somewhere in his second or third season. The path is longer now, but the destination hasn't changed for a scout willing to bet on the physical tools." You get the idea. If we do not need the OT immediately, draft one later and develop him as depth and for next season.  Most college players drafted in round 1 were not first rounders if they had entered the draft the year before,  so why not grab a player with upside?      
    • Its never the QBs fault, so if we get a new WR and he looks bad he must be a bust
    • Based on what? Its certainly not his in game coaching prowess. 
×
×
  • Create New...