Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I listened to the radio call


ladypanther

Recommended Posts

Was out of town for a long weekend. Had to listen to the game via the Panthers radio broadcast. These are my thoughts:

  • The Cards offense was its own worst enemy
  • Stew had 70 yds in the 1st qtr and a 10ypc. He had nothing else until mid/late 4th qtr. Can I guess the play calling was suspect?
  • Foxy got a lead and quit playing????????
  • Sadly, the radio guys are terrible. All of them.

I am very glad that the Panthers got to 2 wins. I am also even happier that the Bengals won.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

These are my thoughts:

[*]Foxy got a lead and quit playing????????

I wouldn't say that's accurate. The Panthers scored in all of the first 3 quarters, had a solid drive in the 4th before Stew lost a fumble. Had another drive that killed nearly 4 minutes of clock before the 2 minute warning that they gave back on 4th down with 1:55 left.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't say that's accurate. The Panthers scored in all of the first 3 quarters, had a solid drive in the 4th before Stew lost a fumble. Had another drive that killed nearly 4 minutes of clock before the 2 minute warning that they gave back on 4th down with 1:55 left.

It's tough when you can't see what is happening.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the radio guys are so bad (mixon especially) that I get a headache when I listen to them.

szoke and robinson are ok. robinson is good for at least 5 laughs a game, especially when he gets excited.

mixon is a tool. he cant follow a play and gets stuck on irrelevant details. i get the feeling that hes always two steps beyond the action.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

szoke and robinson are ok. robinson is good for at least 5 laughs a game, especially when he gets excited.

mixon is a tool. he cant follow a play and gets stuck on irrelevant details. i get the feeling that hes always two steps beyond the action.

Robinson has some good football knowledge but can be painful to listen to at times. He can be hard to understand and trips over words. Szoke didn't really seem to do or add much. Agree about Mixon.

Does not sound like a pro staff. :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't say that's accurate. The Panthers scored in all of the first 3 quarters, had a solid drive in the 4th before Stew lost a fumble. Had another drive that killed nearly 4 minutes of clock before the 2 minute warning that they gave back on 4th down with 1:55 left.

Almost every Coach in the NFL would have at least kicked another FG. But not Fox....some things will not change.

Zod asked if we feel sorry for the Cards fans? Nope, But I do feel sorry for the fans of the next team Fox coaches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I've liked him since his rookie year as a prospect, but when he's been asked to play in a large capacity, he has simply not done well.   He does not really add anything, rather muddies up the room.  Fant is TERRIBLE as a blocker, a pure receiving TE.   Let's just put Tremble aside since he's PUP (although I still like him as a TE2, but yeah he's not our future starter)... Sanders has already shown better receiving skills than a Fant and has a nice ceiling.  Not to mention, he's got in-line run blocking skills.  I really want to see what he's capable of this year.  Also has a year+ experience now in Canales' offense, not to mention legit chemistry with Bryce. And after Sanders, I also imagine our staff is waiting to see how Mitchell Evans looks in camp as he's got the in-line blocking skills.  If he looks fully capable of filling in behind Sanders, then I don't see a need.  Overall, keep an eye out on early August moves.  They are usually soft indicators of how staff's view their rookie late rounders and roster overall.  This is a wait and see what the market presents and how they think their unit looks in camp.  
    • Every team has different needs of the backup QB.   On some teams a young hopeful makes sense and on others an old worn out dude makes sense.  We are a little more in the in-between IMO where you probably would prefer a Fields, Pickett, Howell type IMO.   So a young disappoint that you there is still some hail mary hope in.....given BY essentially was benched both seasons for performance (I know that's not the official line going into Seattle but I think most would agree he got a break and should of been benched later that year).  I know we want Bryce to be the week 17 guy all season this upcoming year.  But it's still in the reasonable thought process that the other dude could show back up. 
    • I wouldn't mind it if they bring him in cheap for competition. I would imagine he would vie for the 3rd TE spot with the rookie. 
×
×
  • Create New...