Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If we get Luck, Bring Jake back..


Fade2BlackAndBlue

Recommended Posts

So if our starter goes down, you would feel okay turning to Jake?

We have turned to Matt Moore, Jimmy Clausen, Tony Pike, Armanti Edwards (briefly), Keith Null, and Brian St. Pierre this year. Combined they have not thrown more touchdows, won more games, or played in more Super Bowls than Delhomme. I would choose a better argument.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have turned to Matt Moore, Jimmy Clausen, Tony Pike, Armanti Edwards (briefly), Keith Null, and Brian St. Pierre this year. Combined they have not thrown more touchdows, won more games, or played in more Super Bowls than Delhomme. I would choose a better argument.

What does that have to do with next year?? Bret Favre actually WON a super bowl, should we bribe him out of retirement to play here too?? Jake is done. Why is that so hard to understand? The Browns have demoted him to THIRD. can he contribute in a non playing role? sure why not, but hes done as a starter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What does that have to do with next year?? Bret Favre actually WON a super bowl, should we bribe him out of retirement to play here too?? Jake is done. Why is that so hard to understand? The Browns have demoted him to THIRD. can he contribute in a non playing role? sure why not, but hes done as a starter.

Find me where someone said we wanted him as a starter, if Luck and Clausen went down then yes he would have to play but he is a better option than St. Pierre, Null, Pike, and Moore based on the aspect of NFL EXPERIENCE. No one said they wanted him to start but it wouldn't hurt the Panthers to bring him in as a third string QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

PEOPLE

Quit looking to deep into this thread, this thread is not about Jake being a starter or even a back-up. It is a question of if you would be ok with Jake being the Panthers third string quarterback. We would have Luck, Clausen, and Delhomme. Right now our third string quarterback is Null/St. Pierre now if you can tell me with a straight face that you would rather have St. Pierre or Null as our third string quarterback over Delhomme than you have more problems than one could imagine and thank God you are not a canadite for next years coaching job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you don't bring a QB as 3rd string, 2nd string, ANY string, that can't start , its pointless

Jake can start, he did for 3 games and played decent enough for a 3rd stringer.

When I first saw this thread I kind of thought the idea was silly, but once I opened it I really took more of a "why-not?" attitude?

I mean we're paying him all that money anyways..Might as well make him do something around here.

Unless of course we could get our hands on a legitimate veteran commodity, then, well, sure why-not?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
×
×
  • Create New...