Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Clausen nominated for rookie of the week


CatMan72

Recommended Posts

well, he had a decent game for a rookie last week, it wasnt great, but he managed the game and it wasnt a great week for rookies by the way, McCoy and The Golden Calf of Bristol lost and Bradford looked bad for a change.

Blount lost and he was nominated. If it is an individual award. I'd say Jacob Ford was more impressive and probably throw in The Golden Calf of Bristol as well. Took him one game and he set the franchise record for longest QB run.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Blount lost and he was nominated. If it is an individual award. I'd say Jacob Ford was more impressive and probably throw in The Golden Calf of Bristol as well. Took him one game and he set the franchise record for longest QB run.

well, i dont know why McCoy's not on there. As for The Golden Calf of Bristol, i think there's a reason he's not there, possibly because he didnt throw much, if at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

well, i dont know why McCoy's not on there. As for The Golden Calf of Bristol, i think there's a reason he's not there, possibly because he didnt throw much, if at all.

opps, get rid of the at all, the point is, The Golden Calf of Bristol threw only 16 times, i know it's the coach's fault, but still, plus he lost 23 to 39, i think he could be on this list next week, he plays an eaiser secondary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

well, i dont know why McCoy's not on there. As for The Golden Calf of Bristol, i think there's a reason he's not there, possibly because he didnt throw much, if at all.

He threw for almost the same yardage as Clausen. He also added 70+ on the ground with an additional TD. So he generated a fair amount of more offense. In The Golden Calf of Bristol's first career start he generated more offense than Clausen has in any game all season.

with Blount getting a nod, winning obviously isn't that big of a factor. So just going of individual performance I might nominate him prior to Clausen. Neither would get my vote though

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He threw for almost the same yardage as Clausen. He also added 70+ on the ground with an additional TD. So he generated a fair amount of more offense. In The Golden Calf of Bristol's first career start he generated more offense than Clausen has in any game all season.

with Blount getting a nod, winning obviously isn't that big of a factor. So just going of individual performance I might nominate him prior to Clausen. Neither would get my vote though

BUT The Golden Calf of Bristol lost 39 to 23, so i can see why he's not there, losing 39 to 23 should take you out of the race, but McCoy should be there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • IDK, the NFL will want to showcase Cam Wards debut. But I've also seen rumors that the Titans will open against Denver, not NO.
    • I'm impressed with the way Tillis is structuring the books. The team is currently spending more on non-premium positions like iOL and S, but that’s because they’ve got rookie deals locked in at several key premium spots: QB: Bryce Young LT: Ikem Ekwonu EDGE: Nic Scourton, Princely Umanmielen WR: Tetairoa McMillan, Xavier Legette, Jalen Coker The only veterans at those premium positions on second contracts are Taylor Moton, Adam Thielen, and the recently extended Jaycee Horn. Given that setup, it makes sense to allocate bigger dollars toward non-premium roles - especially if those pieces support the development and success of the younger core. Investing in iOL helps our young QB. Strengthening the DL helps both of our young EDGE guys and our high-paid CB. I can see the vision. Fingers crossed that it works!
    • I don’t know why the tanking concept is not understood. Coaches and players are not involved at all. It’s always the front office. If we had actually traded players like we should have back in 2022, we would have effectively tanked and gotten a better pick than 9 so we lost all the draft picks to get Young. We traded CMC. We should have traded Burns for the haul and taken GB’s offer of a 1st for Moore. We could have easily traded anyone else. We see it in every sport, every year. Trade deadlines where bad teams give up current assets for future assets. Unfortunately, we were stupid and decided we only wanted to trade CMC for peanuts even though we clearly had a plan to go after Young. We were dumb and there is no way you can tell me that we shouldn’t have tanked via trading away Burns, Moore and anyone else. We’d be a much better team right now had we had a fire sale and tanked the 2022 season. Trading away your top players for future draft picks or prospects (baseball) is tanking. Shoeless Joe and the black Sox is not tanking. That’s point shaving/betting on your sport/team. Again, I just don’t get why this concept is so hard to get when MLB, NFL and NBA teams trade players for future assets every single year and usually end up with better draft slots (or at least odds since Hornets never win the lottery).
×
×
  • Create New...