Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Think about what you'd have to trade...


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

...in order to acquire Peyton Manning.

Now imagine that you're trading for Manning in his youth, with his whole career still ahead of him. Now what do you think you'd have to give up?

The answer to that question likely borders on the ridiculous.

But whatever that is, that's what we'd need to ask for in order to trade away the #1 pick if Andrew Luck comes out.

And if you'd be willing to give that pick up for anything less, all I can say is I'm glad you're not GM :nonod:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Herschel Walker trade 2.0

seriously though, I think that Luck would be able to get two firsts, a second, and maybe a good player.

I wouldn't trade it though. Would rather just take Luck and build around him in future drafts like the Colts did with Peyton.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That being said, Mr. Scot, if you were a betting man, what do you think the odds would be of the Panthers trading the 1st away? That is, if the asking price was met, but not foolish on the other teams part.

If Luck comes out, I wouldn't want them to trade the pick. That's kinda the point.

Can you seriously think of anything that would have adequately compensated the Colts for giving up Manning? I can't.

And yet I've heard people say stuff like "Hey, let's trade the number one and maybe we can get a guard, a defensive tackle and a receiver". Seriously? People think a guard, a DT and a WR would be worth giving up the next Peyton Manning? Thank the Lord they're not in charge :nonod:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And yet I've heard people say stuff like "Hey, let's trade the number one and maybe we can get a guard, a defensive tackle and a receiver". Seriously? People think a guard, a DT and a WR would be worth giving up the next Peyton Manning? Thank the Lord they're not in charge :nonod:

I think those people's opinion of Luck is different. No one is suggesting that we trade the next Peyton Manning because they don't think he's going to be that good. I'm of the opinion that if he comes out we should get him, but people can look at him different and that's fine. You can't compare him to Peyton Manning like it's a foregone conclusion because it's not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think those people's opinion of Luck is different. No one is suggesting that we trade the next Peyton Manning because they don't think he's going to be that good. I'm of the opinion that if he comes out we should get him, but people can look at him different and that's fine. You can't compare him to Peyton Manning like it's a foregone conclusion because it's not.

Ah, but what if he is that good?

No, we don't know the future, but think about it in terms of the potential consequences of each choice.

If you keep the pick and draft a QB who turns out to be a bust, yes it's bad. It's also something that a dozen or more successful GMs have done in the past few decades. A setback, for certain, but not an insurmountable one.

On the other hand, if you pass up the next Peyton Manning (or a guy who proves to be even better) then you are officially certified as the biggest moron in the history of pro football and, quite deservedly, laughed out of the league. That's the kind of mistake your career never recovers from.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On the other hand, if you pass up the next Peyton Manning (or a guy who proves to be even better) then you are officially certified as the biggest moron in the history of pro football and, quite deservedly, laughed out of the league. That's the kind of mistake your career never recovers from.

Agreed. All we need to do is speak with Portland Trail Blazer fans and how they feel about their team passing up Michael Jordan.

So if we do trade the pick, the minimum return I would expect is:

1st

2nd

3rd

1st next year

2nd next year

good player

star player

That is the opening bid for Luck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I see Bryce's development this way: He improved when his supporting cast improved.  TMac and Dowdle saved his arse last year, but in fairness, most good QBs have good WRs and good RBs--and good OLs.   The 2025 OL underperformed, actually. They were above average, but they should have been elite if you consider the salary cap.   As soon as we signed Lewis and Hunt, I started thinking, "That's not sustainable.  With Ickey about to get paid a LT salary, Moton and Hunt grabbling $50m per season combined, and Lewis around $17m--that would be nearly $100m and the Center just walked.  Yikes.  What does that mean?  Rico walks, Mays walks, and we do not have a top 5 WR on a second contract.  We do not have an elite TE, and only 1 is on a modest second contract. And now Bryce will demand $50m for his incremental rise to mediocrity?   So when we sign Bryce, we will get weaker at other positions.  Hunt, Moton, maybe Ickey and Lewis, will all be casualties--that is the right move regardless (not sure yet about Ickey, but he was not elite) Bryce is one lucky, entitled camper.  No competition since being drafted, and he lost his job for a while to the aging clipboard holder.  Now we are bringing in UDFAs and busts to compete with him.  
    • Probably not.  If we are taking a QB, it would be a prospect to replace Bryce and not a flyer type player.  I can't say for sure, but I doubt he would have cracked the top 3-4 QBs even if he were to play this coming season.  
    • The Giants, Cardinals  and Dolphins should have moved on, but they didn't and ended up cutting their QB early into a monster second contract and had to eat a TON of dead cap money.
×
×
  • Create New...