Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Kerry Collins 1st year #.


koolkatluke

Recommended Posts

15 games played 433 att 214 comp 14 td 19 int's 2,717 yards 181 yards a game 73.6 QB rating.

Now I don't remeber his supporting cast but they weren't that great (for a 1st year franchise). He did have a good def. But you saw improvement over the season. My point is we have a chance at finally drafting a 1st round QB again. Maybe we should go this route because what, we have been doing since then is plugging in stop gap and bargin QB in the most improtant postition on the field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I kid, I kid.

I did see some promise from Clausen today. But if Luck comes out, you do not pass up on him. Ideally, Clausen will continue to improve and we'll also work to solidify the offensive line. Maybe he'd be a good backup, but I just don't see him as starter material yet.

If anything, maybe Clausen showed just enough to convince the next coach he's worth sticking around as a project. I see next year's quarterbacks being Luck, Clausen and a vet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree.

I fully expect Clausen to start drinking and throwing out racial slurs next season.

Now I'm not saying he wasn't and ahole but since that bad moment in S-burg.

He's kept his nose clean and been a solid QB.

Maybe if Polian was still here and we, had a better support system 2 help him with his off the field demons. We would have back 2 back winning season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see next year's quarterbacks being Luck, Clausen and a vet.

Smart choice there. I hope you're not saying Matt Moore is a vet on that list, since he suck now. :P

But we need a good vet QB if the money is right. If no vet QB, then I hope we'll be ok with the 3rd guy being Pike. I don't think we're going to get rid of Clausen & Pike, but Moore surely won't be coming back thankfully.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

138/266 for a 51.9% completion rate 1,376 yards 5.2 avg 2 TD's 8 INT's 58.6 rating over 12 games for Clausen.

Collins was miles better. Supporting cast may be similar. Will require more research (which i don't feel like doing).

Translation: We need a QB.

Collins compteted 49% of his passes, threw 14 td's and 19 int's with a 6.2 average. He started more games, and threw more passes than Clausen. Overall, he was a little better, but not by much.

Collins had more of a veteran group of receivers. Clausen has a better running game.

Having veteran receivers is a important plus for a young qb. Just look at how Matt Moore performed last year with Moose and Smith compared to this year with only one veteran receiver. I am not saying thats the only difference, but I do feel its one that is more important than most of realize.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

138/266 for a 51.9% completion rate 1,376 yards 5.2 avg 2 TD's 8 INT's 58.6 rating over 12 games for Clausen.

Collins was miles better. Supporting cast may be similar. Will require more research (which i don't feel like doing).

Translation: We need a QB.

clausen has 3 TDs not 2. one to stewart and two to king

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Collins compteted 49% of his passes, threw 14 td's and 19 int's with a 6.2 average. He started more games, and threw more passes than Clausen. Overall, he was a little better, but not by much.

Collins had more of a veteran group of receivers. Clausen has a better running game.

Having veteran receivers is a important plus for a young qb. Just look at how Matt Moore performed last year with Moose and Smith compared to this year with only one veteran receiver. I am not saying thats the only difference, but I do feel its one that is more important than most of realize.

So mark carrier and Willie Green help Kerry have a 11 more td 20 point higher QB rating and 4-5 more wins?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jimmy Clausen needs to be released. I can't be optimistic about this team's future knowing we are an injury or two away from him playing again.

He's a rookie, throwing to rookie WRs. He's got a terrible OC, a makeshift OL, and a QB coach who loves overcomplicating things.

So what I'm basically saying is, he may suck, but he may not. There are so many variables at work this year that you really can't get a fair bead on anyone.

What we should all really hope for is that he comes back, plays well enough to start ahead of our shiny new rookie for the first half of the season, then gracefully bows out and the Luck era begins. If that happens, we get at least a second for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • with arm strength people often get stuck on the distance  arm strength in the NFL is moreso measured in speed / velocity .which of course is how long does it take for  the ball to travel from the time of release until it reaches its target ? & u beat world class speed with more speed on the ball...just saying  
    • No GM hits 100%. I'm well aware. But what a GM has to do is look at the roster, what's available, and future contracts and go from there. XL was a one season wonder in college. He has speed. Who cares. He body catches and his hands are bricks. Speed doesn't matter when you don't actually have the ball. There were other receivers available with better resumes. XL was a project. Fitts loved projects. You don't have the luxury of projects when you just traded away DJ for a QB. 1st round WRs need to contribute now.  Brooks was a luxury RB pick we didn't have the luxury to make. Who cares if Dallas was going to pick him. We had holes all over our defense. Chuba was coming off a fresh contract. We just inked 150m interior line and then centered it by moving a guard to center that had suffered 2 season ending injuries. The most critical area on our line was being held together by a bandaid and a prayer. No surprise when it didn't work.   Wallace is getting better but Wilson was sitting there waiting to be taken. DPOY for college football right there for the taking. That was a gimme pick. If you're going to take a risk on an injured player, the 3rd round for Wilson made a whole lot more sense at a position we were rest stop TP thin at.  4th round and on aren't going to be heavy contributors unless you're lucky.  He did well on the trade for Jackson. Coker, I believe he offered the largest guarantee. He actually got more than some late round picks make.  Those 1st 3 picks, IMO, were straight up whiffs.  Looking back at Fitterer's picks, I think he tried to plug holes because we had a ton of them. Problem was, he wasn't very good at it and he loved RAS scores and developmental players with a coach that couldn't develop a Polaroid. He tried to do too much. He was impatient. His other problem was he panicked during the draft and couldn't read or understand the flow of how drafts tend to go. DJ Johnson was the prime example. We needed an edge rusher and he jumped in at the end of the run instead of starting it.  Morgan's first year looked exactly like Fitts to me. Lots of projects.  2nd year looks better.  We'll see how 3rd year goes. FA also plays into all of this as well but that's a whole different topic of how it played out and planning with regard to drafting. 
    • I judge how good our players are by the way a defense covers them. XL draws no special coverage. Coker on the other hand always has a man over the top. It still doesn’t matter. You be the judge.
×
×
  • Create New...