Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mortensen Trashes Richardson/Luck to Panthers on Mike and Mike

Proudiddy

By Proudiddy,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Proudiddy Grand Master

Proudiddy

Posted
Posted

Just said JR is in bad mood about the CBA and made you scratch your head with some of the things he said yesterday.

Was talking about Harbaugh possibilities and then it led into Luck's situation... He then said if there is no CBA in place and no rookie scale, Luck should get 50+ mil and said he's not sure JR is willing to pay that much.

Also said Mularkey could end up being interviewed by us but he's too expensive for our taste, lol.

Well, that presser worked...

I'm starting to feel Luck may not want to come out upon further consideration.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PantherBrew Newbie

PantherBrew

Posted
Posted

Ugh, Mortensen is wrong.

The CBA expires in March, and rookies are not signed until June-July.

Rookie wage scale will be in place by the time they are signed.

and if I am wrong, good for us. That is a guarantees that Luck will come out. No way he gives aways 25-30 million dollars.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
C47 Newbie

C47

Posted
Posted

IM also hearing tho that the rookie wage scale in the new CBA will be implemented for the 2012 draft.

could be wrong tho.

If you're right then that may even seal the deal if Harbaugh stayed at Stanford (which I see very unlikely)....good research Salty, if that was research.....:D

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Proudiddy Grand Master

Proudiddy

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I think he will pay the #1 pick. That is why he said he would stay there and not trade down

Yeah, but we're in a sad situation if this is the point we're at -

"Don't think they want to pay the #1 pick, sure-fire lock, franchise QB..."

"Mike Mularkey is too expensive for their taste..."

MIKE F'ING MULARKEY? TOO EXPENSIVE?

I could understand the Harbaugh deal, but that would be ridiculous.

I just hope for our sake these media reports aren't influencing Luck or any other potential candidates for positions with the organization... Hopefully they talk to JR themselves... Wait... Nevermind. Scratch that, I'd rather they not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jpniner Newbie

jpniner

Posted
Posted

Richardson Paid Delhomme, possibly worst QB in NFL, what $13 Million this season to not even play for us?

Geez, the Panthers have been a complete disaster in PR area because of letting go all our Vets, not resigning Peppers and hanging Fox out to dry.

They should've been aware of this, and to save face atleast sign a couple decent Free Agents last year. Branding matters, if the national Perception of the Panthers is the one Luck now holds it may keep him in school.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
The Saltman Apprentice

The Saltman

Posted
Posted

If you're right then that may even seal the deal if Harbaugh stayed at Stanford (which I see very unlikely)....good research Salty' date=' if that was research.....:D[/quote']

I read it in an article. Almost as much research as listening to morten anderson so take that with a grain of salt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Icege
      PFF ranks the 2025 starting QBs

      By Icege · Posted

      Just to clarify: I'm not arguing that height or footwork can’t affect QB play. I'm asking how those concerns translate into measurable, consistent outcomes. That’s the standard we should be applying to all QBs, not just Bryce. If height is such a limitation, then we'd expect to see elevated batted passes or poor pressure evasion. Yet none of that shows up in the data. Bryce was one of the lowest in the league for batted passes and his 16.9 pressure-to-sack ratio is good enough for 9th out of all QBs with 300+ dropbacks. So if you believe footwork tied to height is a meaningful issue, what metric shows that because two that would aren't doing so? This isn't about denying flaws. It's about applying fair, consistent standards because otherwise we’re not evaluating performance which means that it's not analysis taking place... it's just going off of the vibes that somebody has consciously decided on. Citing one red zone play you remember doesn't provide that consistent standard. I don't say that to dismiss your memory, but to emphasize that anecdotal evidence (especially from an avowed skeptic) shouldn’t carry more weight than consistent tape or analytics. For example, there was recently dissonance over Bryce's deep ball accuracy where it was implied that he was inaccurate throwing 20+ yards. Yet, the data and film show otherwise. And I unfortunately have to still ask since you won't directly answer: What specific metrics do you believe matter when evaluating whether a QB is top-10? You've mentioned YPA and passing yards per game, and that's fair. If that's what you're prioritizing, then let's call that your criteria but clarity matters because it prevents moving goalposts when the data doesn’t match one's expectations. I appreciate the response and hope that your holiday weekend goes well also. ❤️
    • KillerKat
      Canes vs Panthers Rd 3 Gm3 8pm

      By KillerKat · Posted

      Me too. I got other things I can do. Tie it up 2-2 and I will be back, but Im tired of watching us get swept.
    • carpanfan96
      First goal 25 Playoff Series

      By carpanfan96 · Posted

      Svechnikov and I'm voting cause I'm pissed. 
×
×
  • Create New...