Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What makes Blaine Gabbert different from Tony Pike?


Carl Spackler

Recommended Posts

stats are largely meaningless. Gabbert's tools are why he is surging up the draft board. He still has big question marks as everyone here notes though.

TDs are sometimes a reflection of who you are playing with too. Still, this year is much more of a disappointment than his last. If he had put up numbers like last year he probably would be worth his high place in the first round... well, if he fixed the completion percentage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the mocks and "experts" are all swept up in QBs this year. Cam Newton will probably be the first QB taken-around #16 or so, and the only QB taken in the first round. I see Mallett, Locker, Gabbert all going in the second. Remember, a lot fo folks had Clausen in the top 10 last year, and Pike going in the 3rd.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the mocks and "experts" are all swept up in QBs this year. Cam Newton will probably be the first QB taken-around #16 or so, and the only QB taken in the first round. I see Mallett, Locker, Gabbert all going in the second. Remember, a lot fo folks had Clausen in the top 10 last year, and Pike going in the 3rd.

the same person who had Clausen in the 2nd has Gabbert in the first though, and very high at that.

we'll see what happens...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

apparently he's super smart, get's good grades and all, strong work ethic, leader in the locker room, arm strength is just below elite and a drive to get better and better. he has been climbing up the draft guru's boards all year for whatever reason, and he is now currently a top 10 pick in most drafts, that was WITH andrew luck still on the board.

here's what scouts inc. has to say aboot him:

blainegabbert.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anyone have that scouting report for Clausen, so we can see where it's right and where it's wrong?

Todd McShay had quesitons about his skillset and his overall maturity, mental capacity and had him at 36 on his draft board. McShay also thought he could easily become "another bust from Notre Dame". McShay is sold on Gabbert being at least an above average quarterback.

I can't find the same profile posted above for Clausen though.

The hype about Clausen and Gabbert is focused on different areas. Clausen was that he was "pro ready", so experienced in an NFL system. Gabbert's is that his potential is very high, has great intangibles (a question of Clausen's all along).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Sometimes its fun to read the threads/posts.  The panthers could literally hire a groundskeeper and we'd have a thread "improving the field for no other reason to prop up Bryce Young".  Apparently no move is ever done to actually make the team better.  All a conspiracy to just focus on Bryce Young. Or suddenly daydreaming and reminiscing about Sam Darnold when he was hated more than Bryce Young.  Its really fun to do a message board search about Darnold during that time period.   Or thinking there is just a tree that grows QB, and you can just easily go up and pluck one.   
    • Yeah okay. We as an organization have been more patient with him than many. And there has been a small parade of guys drafted since he was, also to bad teams, that have passed him. Some have lapped him. As a fan I am out of patience but he gets this year it is out of my hands always has been. I just hope the bar is higher than it has been for him.    FWIW, XL dropped two passes last year. He did do some other bad stuff, just saying. 
    • Except it takes those QB's a few years to develop because they needed to learn the mental side of the game and have it catch up to their physical attributes. Bryce was supposed to be a QB savant who already had a fully developed mental side of the game and that was going to make up for his lack of physical ability.  And his lack of NFL level QB physical traits has been clear as day to anyone who has watched him the last 3 years, mainly, he just doesn't have an NFL arm, he can't zip the ball into tight spaces or throw on a line down the field like is needed at this level.
×
×
  • Create New...