If Fairley=Sapp & Green=Andre J who then??

[trucpfan]

I'm just wondering if Fairley pans out to be like Sapp and Green pans out to be the equvalient to Randy Moss as we are now who would people want us to pick. Im not talking about this guy could be a bust or that guy might not blah blah at their best who should we go after for our current team???

[Cat'sGrowl]

If that's the case, then Andre.

Andre is insane..

[GritsRgreat]

When talent is =, always draft the bigger player

[PanthersGuy28]

If that's the case, then Andre.

Andre is insane..

I agree with that, but Green isn't close to Andre IMO, I say Fairley all day.

[bleys]

depends.. our defense was 12th overall while on the field longer than any other defense (close enough to make that statement)

since we had no spectacular DT's then, and there are more FA DT's by far compared to WR FAs... why wouldn't you take Green?

and FFS, we don't need to trade Smitty unless we are offered a 2nd.. or two 3rds.. (it makes no sense to take away talent from an already bad offense)

Pick up Orton and we have a QB for next couple years until we address the issue..

[CarolinaPanthers8789]

Well in that case Andre because Andre beat the poo out of Cortland Finnegan and that guy is a tool. However, Green has a long way to go to get that kind of rep.

[GritsRgreat]

BTW, Johnson has never played in a playoff game, while Sapp has won a Superbowl.

[jtnc]

Fairley. They can't stop'em.

[bleys]

BTW, Johnson has never played in a playoff game, while Sapp has won a Superbowl.

how is that relevant?

I agree with that, but Green isn't close to Andre IMO, I say Fairley all day.

and Fairley ain't no Sapp.. that is not the point of this thread.. try again.

[GritsRgreat]

how is that relevant?

and Fairley ain't no Sapp.. that is not the point of this thread.. try again.

Championship teams are built around a quarterback and in the trenches, NOT around wideouts. TO, Moss, C Johnson A Johnson, none have won the big game.

[trucpfan]

depends.. our defense was 12th overall while on the field longer than any other defense (close enough to make that statement)

since we had no spectacular DT's then, and there are more FA DT's by far compared to WR FAs... why wouldn't you take Green?

and FFS, we don't need to trade Smitty unless we are offered a 2nd.. or two 3rds.. (it makes no sense to take away talent from an already bad offense)

Pick up Orton and we have a QB for next couple years until we address the issue..

I can see your point but you have to think a tenacious d gives your offense chance after chance ie Mark S last year. Going from 12 to 3 or 4 with failey and a FA could be just what we need. Otah's return boost our running game back to atleast top six. I don't know because a Johnson type with what we have could be deadly in so many different ways just trying to get some different view points.

how is that relevant?

and Fairley ain't no Sapp.. that is not the point of this thread.. try again.

Yea I'm not saying they are or will be just wondering for the current state of our team in a very optimistic view what pick would help us out the most if both could reach elite levels.

[trucpfan]

Championship teams are built around a quarterback and in the trenches, NOT around wideouts. TO, Moss, C Johnson A Johnson, none have won the big game.

Very true.

[Cyberjag]

A wide receiver is relevant when the ball is thrown his way. A defensive tackle is relevant on every single play.

[Tutto]

If thats how both were to pan out, you definitely take Fairley. Games are won and lost in the trenches. Sure, Green might be the more flashy exciting pick, but you should go with the DT.