Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Something Rivera Said/Nick Fairley


Catalyst

Recommended Posts

Remember when we went 1-15, got a new coach and picked the fast, strong, crazy athletic DE #2 overall in the draft and then went to the superbowl two years later??

Awesome.

Peppers isn't dirty. Fairley is. That stuff he's pulling off in College will get him ejected in the NFL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

our d will be fine when we are on it less than 75% of the time, focus on offense and take green

As good as Green is he will not make our Offense better. He would be a boon for a team like the Rams but not us. We are stacked at WR this point and to add another would mean losing someone with more experience.

Problem with Nick is that he dose not blow up run plays but gets consumed by them. He also has problems getting clear of a double team. The more tape I watch of him(and those are his high lights) the more I dont want him. Seems to me he is a young Damione Lewis. Who didnt pan out in STL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

NOW HOLD ON ONE SEC

if we are going to bash Fairley we at least have to bash Brayton. At least Fairley doesn't do nut shots and commits his dirty play while he is an ELIGIBLE PLAYER ON THE FIELD!!!

Come on he played for the Raiders... Brayton has not committed one PF with the panthers. Fairley reminds me a lot of Lewis or a less talented Kris Jenkins. His style of play is more Jenkins in where PFs and off sides happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TBH, these are the kind of players that get weeded out of professional sports pretty quickly. Also, CMC is not that guy. There is zero indication that he isn't competitive. 
    • I like the free agency. It actually helps basically all schools across the board. Pretty much only ancient HC's and/or HC's that haven't been able to adjust have been complaining about the free agency. Your fortunes can be made or broken every offseason. It's not like before where a bad recruiting class or two meant multiyear purgatory.  I will never understand all the bellyaching about the NIL. If you want to talk about what ruined college athletics, it has been naked greed. Conference expansions for TV revenue, ever skyrocketing AD and facilities costs and now the attempts to permanently ruin the postseasons(football and basketball).  All the kids did was get a very well deserved piece of a very, very, VERY broken pie.
    • Nobody is saying they don't count against the cap, because yes, they technically do count against the cap as it's money the team is paying and it needs to be accounted for. But what you're not grasping it seems is that if a player gets $10 million guaranteed in their contract, whether they get literally $0 as a signing bonus or $8 million as a signing bonus, it doesn't change the overall cap hit of the contract, because cap hits are about the guaranteed money, not how much is paid up front. The only thing that how much is paid up front changes, is how the cap hit can be spread out amongst the years. So yes, technically there could end up being a slightly bigger cap hit in year 3 and 4 due to a bigger signing bonus, but if that is the case, it also means there will be a lesser cap hit in years 1 and 2 than there would have been with a smaller bonus.  But over the length of the contract, the size of the signing bonus has literally zero affect on the overall cap hit of the contract, because THAT part of it is 100% about the guaranteed money and nothing else.
×
×
  • Create New...