Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Could Matt Moore still be our guy?


Snake

Recommended Posts

LOL Make baseless statements and hope you don't get called out :thumbsup:

Why do I waste my time with people like you?

Good day

Do you even know what a baseless statement is?

Or do you just throw out random internet jargon in an effort to try and save yourself?

Keep trying, TRD. You might get there someday. But I guess if you haven't gotten it by now, you never will.

Kind of like a certain QB I know..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It also helps to have some support around you, like a decent running game, but let's ignore all other factors and pretend they were constant and only focus on if he came into season #1 or not.

Nearly every QB in the league has a 3 interception game, some have 4 interception games. Are they not competent either?

Not all interceptions are created equally, the int's Moore threw in the Giants game were mistakes I would expect a rookie to make, not a 4th year player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't you think you are making a lot out of one game?

He said he felt the pressure, which all athletes do, not that he felt pressure and couldn't handle it. There's a big difference.

Okay, tell me about a game when the pressure was on and Moore performed well?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay, tell me about a game when the pressure was on and Moore performed well?

The pressure is always on NFL players. You don't think there is pressure on him when he's in the last year of his contract and he's playing for his NFL life?

You don't think there's pressure on him after getting benched, then given a second chance?

Or are you only saying certain types of pressure?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you even know what a baseless statement is?

Or do you just throw out random internet jargon in an effort to try and save yourself?

Keep trying, TRD. You might get there someday. But I guess if you haven't gotten it by now, you never will.

Kind of like a certain QB I know..

Another post with nothing but blah blah blah in it

I'm still waiting for you to back up your statement...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay, tell me about a game when the pressure was on and Moore performed well?

He did fairly well with our playoff chances on the line in 2007 as a rookie against the Cowgirls and if it wasn't for having the refs in their back pocket we could have won that game. Outside of that there haven't been many positives to go with pressured situations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The pressure is always on NFL players. You don't think there is pressure on him when he's in the last year of his contract and he's playing for his NFL life?

You don't think there's pressure on him after getting benched, then given a second chance?

Or are you only saying certain types of pressure?

So you're saying the pressure to play well when you're 0-4 after already being benched in favor of a rookie is the same as the pressure on opening day when you've been passed the mantle as "the guy"?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He did fairly well with our playoff chances on the line in 2007 as a rookie against the Cowgirls and if it wasn't for having the refs in their back pocket we could have won that game. Outside of that there haven't been many positives to go with pressured situations.

"It doesn't matter if playoffs were on the line or what other pressure he was facing, only that he wasn't the guy and that's all that matters because that's all that supports my point. Other than that I got nothing..."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"It doesn't matter if playoffs were on the line or what other pressure he was facing, only that he wasn't the guy and that's all that matters because that's all that supports my point. Other than that I got nothing..."

:confused:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think we were mathematically eliminated from playoff contention when Moore took over last year either, but it wasn't a realistic shot.

He has played in games with meaning but there's a different sort of pressure when you go through the offseason and prepare etc.

I wish we coulda seen what Moore could have done in the last half of this season once our running game found wheels though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I would say that he's pulling things out of his ass to get people to visit his site.
    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
×
×
  • Create New...