Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers Show Interest In Draft TE Prospect


pantherfan81

Recommended Posts

Teams talking to potential draft picks really means nothing. What teams tell them means even less. The kid I coached was told by the Colts (the most honest franchise in football) that if he was there in the 5th they would take him. He fell to the 7th and got drafted by the Seahawks. Colts took another guy at the same position in the 6th.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Teams talking to potential draft picks really means nothing. What teams tell them means even less. The kid I coached was told by the Colts (the most honest franchise in football) that if he was there in the 5th they would take him. He fell to the 7th and got drafted by the Seahawks. Colts took another guy at the same position in the 6th.

There's no such thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hell the Panthers almost got in The Golden Calf of Bristol's bed with as much time as they spent with him but they didn't draft him.

Ummm, The Golden Calf of Bristol was taken by the Broncos with the 25th selection. Last year we didn't have a first rounder to take him with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ummm, The Golden Calf of Bristol was taken by the Broncos with the 25th selection. Last year we didn't have a first rounder to take him with.

Neither did the Broncos....their pick was 14....they traded down several times and got Thomas and The Golden Calf of Bristol. We could have moved in to get him if we wanted to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The division is most certainly wide open. The Bucs are a problem but Baker Mayfield is and will remain his own worst enemy it's a matter of when not if he has a bad game or even a stretch of bad games. As far as the Panthers they have done an admirable job of trying to address needs as best they can without pulling a Scott Fitterer and getting desperate which has only made us worse off in the past. On the Bryce subject all anyone can really say at this point is we just have to wait and see. This is the year and despite what the Panthers may say publicly doubling down and going all in on WR is as good as any sign anyone should need that they expect Bryce Young to have a very productive and convincing season. The pieces are in place. They aren't perfect but nothing ever will be. Regardless there's honestly no excuse for this staff and this team not to be able to compete in this iteration of the NFC South. Also just want to say this because I can say the hyper defensive posts already being made in here and it's probably going to be a season with highs and lows again but hopefully more highs for sure. But just because there is dialogue about a position group or a player that challenges your preconceived notions or makes you uncomfortable does not make it "hate" or "anti" this player or that player. For some people who talk a lot about nuance you would think this wouldn't need to be stated but that's where we're at. 
    • If I was a coach I would preach "Don't let the refs decide the game" because as soon as you let the NFL the chance to help their bottom dollar whether it be teams that make most money or gambling then they will screw the team that doesn't fit their bottom line......is it rigged? No but do they try and make certain narratives happen abso-freakin-lutley. As I stated in a previous thread NFL players are the ones that SHOULD have all guaranteed contracts but the boot lickers on this forum disagree and argue for the billionaires in this world who own these teams, sheep
    • I wont go quite so far as to say games are rigged.  You wouldnt have to work hard to convince me there was the occasional thumb on the scale but outright rigged? nah.   but collusion on the rest of the "business" of football, sure.  No one really believes that the only time the 32 owners act as one is during the negotiations of the CBA do they?
×
×
  • Create New...